Published September 25, 2025 | Version v1
Report Open

The ERC DANCING Project Final Report

  • 1. ROR icon National University of Ireland, Maynooth

Description

This report presents an overview of the past 5 years of research led under the European Research Council (ERC) funded project ‘Protecting the Right to Culture of Persons with Disabilities and Enhancing Cultural Diversity through European Union (EU) Law: Exploring New Paths – DANCING’. It describes the project, its objectives and ambitions, as well as delves into its organisational approaches and dissemination strategy. On the whole, the report showcases how DANCING has advanced the state of knowledge and contributed to methodological innovation. It further discusses the extent to which DANCING contributed to interdisciplinary scholarship on disability rights, particularly on the right of persons with disabilities to participate in cultural life, and supported the shaping of EU disability law as a standalone field of academic research. In that regard, the report shows that DANCING also enriched the broader scholarly debate on the EU integration, and on non-doctrinal methodological approaches to EU law. The impact of DANCING extends beyond scholarship, and the report further presents how the project endeavoured to effect social and policy change in the Cultural and Creative Sector (CCS).

DANCING comprised four different Work Packages (WP). Three of them relate to the key objectives of the project (experiential, normative and theoretical), while the fourth focuses on translating the research into practical tools for change which affect various stakeholders of the project. DANCING embraced a socio-legal perspective, and pursued an analysis of law that directly engaged with the social contexts, practices and stakes to which legal norms apply. Consistent with this perspective, and in order to achieve the three objectives indicated above, DANCING’s research strategy combined legal doctrinal research, qualitative research and arts-based research. 

Over the past five years, DANCING produced groundbreaking research. The project shed light on the barriers to, and facilitators of, cultural participation experienced by persons with disabilities and how they affect the wider cultural domain. It provided a normative exploration of how the EU has used - and can use in the future - its full range of competences to make the CCS more inclusive of, and more accessible to, persons with disabilities. It also looked at the intertwining between the promotion of accessibility and inclusivity and the enhancement of cultural diversity. The project also articulated a new theorisation of the promotion of cultural diversity as encompassing disability within the EU legal order. Such theorisation underpins several of the scholarly outputs released in the last part of the project or currently in press.

The findings of the DANCING project were disseminated beyond academic circles through a range of initiatives, including non-academic publications and public events, aimed at raising awareness among the broadest possible audience. DANCING’s ambition, innovative research methods, and numerous achievements contributed to unveiling both the normative and practical dimensions of participation in cultural life for people with disabilities, while opening new avenues for future interdisciplinary research.

Files

ERC DANCING PROJECT FINAL REPORT.pdf

Files (3.0 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:39af682edcba895c660127356c00e237
3.0 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Funding

European Commission
DANCING - Protecting the Right to Culture of Persons with Disabilities and Enhancing Cultural Diversity through European Union Law: Exploring New Paths 864182

References

  • Acoccella, I. and Cataldi, S. (2021) Using focus groups: theory, methodology, practice. London: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529739794
  • Albright, A. C. (2001). Strategic abilities: Negotiating the Disabled Body in Dance. In: Dills, A. and Cooper, A. A. (eds.), Moving history/dancing cultures: A dance history reader. Middletown: Wesleyn University Press, 56-66.
  • Boswell, B., Ko, B. and Yoon, S. (2023) Experiences and Motivations of Dancers with and without Disabilities in Inclusive Dance, Sport, Education and Society, 28(5), 508-521. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2022.2047018
  • Boswell, B., Ko, B. and Yoon, S. (2023) Experiences and Motivations of Dancers with and without Disabilities in Inclusive Dance, Sport, Education and Society, 28(5), 508-521. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2022.2047018
  • Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2021). One Size Fits All? What Counts as Quality Practice in (Reflexive) Thematic Analysis?, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
  • Caust, J. (2019). Cultural rights as human rights and the impact on the expression of arts practices, Journal of Citizenship and Globalisation Studies, 3(1), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.21153/jcgs2019vol3no1art1051
  • Chow, S. (2018). Cultural rights in international law and discourse: contemporary challenges and interdisciplinary perspectives. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff.
  • Clarke, V. and Braun, V. (2013). Teaching Thematic Analysis: Overcoming Challenges and Developing Strategies for Effective Learning, The Psychologist, 26(2), 120–123.
  • Coemans, S. and Hannes, K. (2017). Researchers under the Spell of the Arts: Two Decades of using Arts-based Methods in Community-based Inquiry with Vulnerable Populations, Educational Research Review, 22, 34-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.003
  • Coemans, S., Raymakers, A.-L., Vandenabeele, J. and Hannes, K. (2017). Evaluating the extent to which social researchers apply feminist and empowerment frameworks in photovoice studies with female participants: A literature review, Qualitative Social Work, 18(1), 37-59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325017699263
  • De Búrca, G., Keohane, R. O., and Sabel, C. (2014). Global Experimentalist Governance. British Journal of Political Science, 44(3), 477–486. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43821630
  • Degener, T. (2017). A New Human Rights Model of Disability. In Della Fina, V., Cera, R., Palmisano, G. (eds), The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Springer, Cham. 41-59.
  • Ferri, D. (2021). Data Management Plan - Protecting the Right to Culture of Persons with Disabilities and Enhancing Cultural Diversity in European Union Law: Exploring New Paths. Version 2 (Reviewed 30th June 2021).
  • Franz, J. M. (2010). Arts-based Research for Teachers, Researchers and Supervisors. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology.
  • Given, L. M. (2008). Semi-Structured Interview. In Given, L. M. (ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 810-811.
  • Glaser, J. M. (1996). The Challenge of Campaign Watching: Seven Lessons of Participant-Observation Research, PS: Political Science & Politics, 29(3): 533–7. https://doi.org/10.2307/420839
  • Gray, J., et al. (2011). Best practice in archiving qualitative data, NIRSA Working Paper Series No. 65.
  • Hermans, C. (2016). Differences in Itself: Redefining Disability through Dance, Social Inclusion, 4(4), 160-167. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v4i4.699
  • Hutchinson, T. and Duncan, N. (2012). Defining and Describing What We Do: Doctrinal Legal Research, Deakin Law Review, 17(1): 83–119. https://doi.org/10.21153/dlr2012vol17no1art70
  • Jones, K. and Leavy, P. (2014). A Conversation Between Kip Jones and Patricia Leavy: Arts-Based Research, Performative Social Science and Working on the Margins, The Qualitative Report, 19(19), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1232
  • Linden, B. (2008). Basic Blue Skies Research in the UK: Are we losing out?, Journal of Biomedical Discovery and Collaboration, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-5333-3-3
  • Marshall, C. and Rossman, G. B. (1995). Designing Qualitative Research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
  • McGrath, A., Durrer, V., and Campbell, P. (2022). Dancing with Epistemic Borders: Knowledge and Unknowns in Mixed-Methods Practice-as-Research (PaR) Collaborations Between Dance and Social Science, Performance Research, 26(4): 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2021.2005966
  • Morgan, D. L. (2019). Basic and Advanced Focus Groups. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
  • Mulcahy, L. and Cahill-O'Callaghan, R. (2021). Introduction: Socio-legal methodologies, Journal of Law and Society, 48(S1). https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12336
  • Musante DeWalt, K. M. and DeWalt B. R. (2010). Participant Observation: A Guide for Fieldworkers. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.
  • Romainville, C. (2015). Defining the right to participate in cultural life as a human right. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 33(4), 405-436. https://doi.org/10.1177/016934411503300404
  • Tatić, D. (2015). Access for people with disabilities to culture, tourism, sports and leisure activities: Towards meaningful and enriching participation. Council of Europe. rc108access-people-disabilities-culture-tourismsports-and-leisure-activities-1585.pdf
  • Tedlock, B. (1991). From Participant Observation to the Observation of Participation: The Emergence of Narrative Ethnography, Journal of Anthropological Research, 47(1), 69–94. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3630581
  • UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD Committee). (2018a). General Comment no. 6 on equality and non-discrimination. CRPD/C/GC/6.
  • UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD Committee). (2018b). General Comment No. 7 on the participation of persons with disabilities, including children with disabilities, through their representative organisations, in the implementation and monitoring of the Convention. CRPD/C/GC/7.
  • Whatley, S. (2007). Dance and disability: the dancer, the viewer and the presumption of difference, Research in Dance Education, 8(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647890701272639
  • Whatley, S. (2010). The spectacle of difference: Dance and disability on screen, The International Journal of Screendance, 1(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.18061/ijsd.v1i0.6144
  • Whatley, S. and Marsh, K. (2017). Making no Difference: Inclusive Dance Pedagogy. In Burridge, S. and Svendler Nielsen, C. (eds.) Dance, Access and Inclusion: Perspectives on Dance, Young People and Change. Abingdon: Routledge, 2-11.
  • Whatley, S., Waelde, C., Harmon, S., Brown A., Wood K. and Blades H. (eds) (2018). Dance, Disability and Law: InVisible Difference. Bristol: Intellect Press.
  • Whatley, S. (2023). Dance, Disability and Keeping "In Time" on "Strictly". In Backhausen, E., Wihstutz, B., and Winter, N., (eds), Out of Time?: Temporality in Disability Performance. London: Routledge, pp. 61–78.