Published April 23, 2025 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Developing and Validating Species Distribution Models for Wetland Plants Across Europe

  • 1. ROR icon Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
  • 2. ROR icon Leiden University
  • 3. Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje
  • 4. ROR icon Universidad de Oviedo
  • 5. German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research
  • 6. ROR icon University of Warsaw
  • 7. ROR icon Sapienza University of Rome
  • 8. Faculty of Geotechnical Engineering, University of Zagreb
  • 9. Radboud University
  • 10. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency

Description

Drainage, agricultural conversion, and climate change threaten wetlands and their unique biodiversity. Species distribution models (SDMs) can help to identify effective conservation measures. However, existing SDMs for wetland plants are often geographically limited, miss variables representing hydrological conditions, and neglect moss species, essential to many wetlands. Here, we developed and validated SDMs for 265 vascular plant and moss species characteristic of European wetlands, using environmental variables representing climate, soil, hydrology, and anthropogenic pressures. We validated the spatial predictions of the SDMs through cross-validation and against independent data from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). Further, we validated the niche optima of the species, as obtained from the modelled species response curves, with empirical niche optima. The spatial validation revealed good predictive power of the SDMs, especially for diagnostic mosses, for which we obtained median cross-validated values of the area under the curve (AUC) and true skill statistic (TSS) of 0.93 and 0.73, respectively, and a median true positive rate (TPR) based on GBIF records of 0.77. SDMs of diagnostic vascular plants performed well, too, with median AUC, TSS, and TPR of 0.91, 0.69, and 0.67, respectively. SDMs of non-diagnostic plants had the lowest performance, with median AUC, TSS, and TPR values of 0.84, 0.53, and 0.62, respectively. Correlations between modelled and empirical niche optima were typically in the expected direction. Climate variables, particularly the mean temperature of the coldest month, were the strongest predictors of species occurrence. At the same time, groundwater table depth was a significant predictor for diagnostic vascular plants but not for mosses. We concluded that our SDMs are suitable for predicting broad-scale patterns of wetland plant species distributions as governed by climatic conditions. Alternative or additional variables or a different modelling approach might be needed to represent better the local heterogeneity in the hydrological conditions of wetlands. This journal article is supported by the WET HORIZONS project.

Files

Sumbh et al 2025_Developing and Validating SDMs for Wetland Plants Across Europe.pdf

Additional details

Funding

European Commission
WET HORIZONS - WET HORIZONS - upgrading knowledge and solutions to fast-track wetland restoration across Europe 101056848