Timeline Review of Kletetschka's 3D Time Theory & Blumberg's SIT, SDT, QGTCD, and other similar theories
Creators
- 1. The Self Aware Networks Institute (An Independent Research Group)
Description
Timeline Review of Kletetschka’s 3D Time Theory & Blumberg’s SIT, SDT, QGTCD, and other similar theories
2025-07-25 | Journal article | Author: Micah Blumberg
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.29647640
SOURCE-WORK-ID: 29647640
Contributors: Micah Blumberg
Original Publication Date: August 2025
Overview
This paper compares Kletetschka’s 3D Time Theory with earlier frameworks from my research program—Super Information Theory (SIT, 2025), Super Dark Time (SDT, 2025), and Quantum Gradient Time Crystal Dilation (QGTCD, 2022)—to test for functional equivalence and establish priority.
Translation & Mapping (Examples)
-
“3D time manifold” ↔ coherence geometry + time-density ρₜ(x) (SIT); temporal structure encoded by coherence gradients rather than extra axes.
-
“Curvature in time” ↔ gradients of coherence/time-density sourcing effective gravitational response (SIT/SDT).
-
“Time-based lensing/anomalies” ↔ refractive-index analogs in coherence space and local time-density computations (SDT).
-
“Temporal crystal structure” ↔ QGTCD time crystals driving dilation/coherence conservation.
Formal Equivalence Tests
-
Pi Calculus: Protocols derived from 3D-time interactions and from SIT/SDT/QGTCD produce behaviorally indistinguishable coordination traces.
-
Category Theory: Constructed functors map 3D-time objects/morphisms to coherence/time-density objects/morphisms, yielding functional isomorphism up to natural equivalence.
Priority Timeline (abbreviated)
-
2017: Public disclosure of foundational ideas on the Neural Lace Podcast.
-
2022: QGTCD establishes “time-crystal” operators and coherence-dilation mechanics.
-
Jan 2025: SDT formalizes local gravitational computation via time-density.
-
Feb 2025: SIT unifies coherence ψ(x) and time-density ρₜ(x) under a single action principle.
-
2025: 3D Time Theory appears subsequently, repackaging overlapping mechanisms in alternate vocabulary.
Conclusion
While nomenclature differs, the computational content and structural roles are interchangeable: 3D-time constructs and SIT/SDT/QGTCD compute the same class of dynamics. The explanatory power in 3D Time Theory is shown to rest on mechanisms published earlier in SIT/SDT/QGTCD.
Archival Context
Given the suspension of my Figshare account (likely tied to ongoing priority disputes), this work is maintained in parallel archives to ensure persistence and citability of the priority record.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5175-9532
(Optional Zenodo “Related identifiers”)
-
References → SIT (Feb 2025; DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.28379318), SDT (Jan 2025; DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.28284545), QGTCD (2022; GitHub)
-
IsPartOf → “SIT/SDT/QGTCD priority and equivalence series (2017–2025)”
Files
Kletetschka’s 3D Time Theory vs Blumberg’s SIT, SDT, and QGTCD.pdf
Files
(1.4 MB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:f38392db9ef93c0ea538c4f26fc22e0c
|
1.4 MB | Preview Download |