Published July 23, 2025
| Version 1
Journal article
Open
Against AI Welfare: Care Practices Should Prioritize Living Beings Over AI
Creators
- 1. Center for Environmental and Technology Ethics, Prague (CETE-P), Institute of Philosophy, Czech Academy of Sciences
-
2.
Stanford University
- 3. University of Edinburgh
- 4. Centre for Technomoral Futures, Edinburgh Futures Institute
-
5.
University of Vienna
-
6.
Centre for European Policy Studies
-
7.
Universität der Bundeswehr München
Description
In this Comment, we critique the growing “AI welfare” movement and propose a novel guideline, the Precarity Guideline, to determine care entitlement. In contrast to approaches that emphasize potential for suffering, the Precarity Guideline is grounded in empirically identifiable features. The severity of ongoing humanitarian crises, biodiversity loss, climate change provide additional reasons to prioritize the needs of living beings over machine learning algorithms as candidates for care.
Files
Article_Dorsch_et_al. _Against_AI_Welfare_AAM.pdf
Files
(175.0 kB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:64fe465fed9470341b24dec175b5e4ea
|
175.0 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Identifiers
Related works
- Is published in
- Journal article: 10.1002/aaai.70016 (DOI)
- Is version of
- Preprint: 10.31219/osf.io/h57pw_v1 (DOI)
Funding
Dates
- Accepted
-
2025-07-23Author's Accepted Manuscript