AI in Action: Understanding Consumer Response in Cross-Channel Marketing
Creators
- 1. Associate Professor, Department of Commerce, Government Arts College (Affiliated to Bharathidasan University), Tiruchy (Tamil Nadu), India.
- 1. Associate Professor, Department of Commerce, Government Arts College (Affiliated to Bharathidasan University), Tiruchy (Tamil Nadu), India.
- 2. Assistant Professor, CARE College of Arts and Science (Affiliated to Bharathidasan University), Tiruchy (Tamil Nadu), India.
Description
Abstract: This study aims to investigate the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on consumer responses in the realm of crosschannel marketing. As companies adopt AI technologies to provide tailored experiences on digital platforms such as email, websites, and social media, it is crucial to understand consumer perceptions and behavioural responses. This study employs a quantitative approach, using a structured questionnaire to assess seven independent variables: personalisation, transparency, cross-channel consistency, trust in AI, ease of use, AI-generated suggestions, and privacy concerns, alongside one dependent variable, consumer response. Each item was assessed utilising a five-point Likert scale. The data collection involved an online survey disseminated through social media channels, which facilitated a broad representation of demographics without geographic limitations. A total of 184 valid responses were collected from mid-January to the end of February 2025. The data analysis took place in March, utilising JMP statistical software and applying multiple linear regression to assess the impact of AI-related constructs on consumer responses. The results indicated that comprehending the functionality of AI, the simplicity of engaging with AI-driven platforms, and the perception of personalisation play crucial roles in influencing consumers' readiness to respond to AI-generated suggestions. Nevertheless, conventional marketing elements, such as message consistency and the acceptance of AI tools, demonstrated limited predictive capability. Interestingly, personalisation showed a negative correlation, indicating a potential consumer backlash against overly aggressive targeting. The findings underscore the increasing demand for transparency, usability, and the ethical application of AI in marketing. This investigation offers actionable insights for marketers and contributes to the growing conversation about consumer-AI engagement in online settings.
Files
I182011090525.pdf
Files
(942.9 kB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:5bda975640c363ad3806c8c19ce503fa
|
942.9 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.35940/ijmh.I1820.11110725
- EISSN
- 2394-0913
Dates
- Accepted
-
2025-07-15Manuscript Received on 17 April 2025 | First Revised Manuscript Received on 22 April 2025 | Second Revised Manuscript Received on 17 June 2025 | Manuscript Accepted on 15 July 2025 | Manuscript published on 30 July 2025.
References
- Arora, N., Dreze, X., Ghose, A., Hess, J. D., Iyengar, R., Jing, B., ... & Zhang, Z. J. (2008). Putting one-to-one marketing to work: Personalization, customization, and choice. Marketing Letters, 19, 305- 321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-008-9056-z
- Tam, K. Y., & Ho, S. Y. (2006). Understanding the impact of web personalization on user information processing and decision outcomes. MIS quarterly, 865-890. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/25148757
- Rawool, V., Foroudi, P. & Palazzo, M. (2024) AI-powered voice assistants: developing a framework for building consumer trust and fostering brand loyalty. Electronic Commerce Research, 1-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-024-09850-5
- Khan, A. W., & Mishra, A. (2024). AI credibility and consumer-AI experiences: a conceptual framework. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 34(1), 66-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-03-2023- 0108
- Keller, K. L. (2013). Building strong brands in a modern marketing communications environment. In The evolution of integrated marketing communications (pp. 65-81). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315872728- 5/building-strong-brands-modern-marketing-communicationsenvironment-kevin-lane-keller
- Kannan, P. K. (2017). Digital marketing: A framework, review and research agenda. International journal of research in marketing, 34(1), 22-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.11.006
- Ghazizadeh, M., Lee, J.D. & Boyle, L.N. (2012). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to assess automation. Cogn Tech Work 14, 39–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-011-0194-3
- Paluch, S., & Wünderlich, N. V. (2016). Contrasting risk perceptions of technology-based service innovations in inter-organizational settings. Journal of Business Research, 69(7), 2424-2431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.012
- Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
- Huang, M.-H., & Rust, R. T. (2018). Artificial Intelligence in Service. Journal of Service Research, 21(2), 155-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670517752459
- Schafer, J. B., Konstan, J. A., & Riedl, J. (2001). E-commerce recommendation applications. Data mining and knowledge discovery, 5, 115-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009804230409
- Abdurrahman, A. (2025). Examining the impact of digital transformation on digital product innovation performance in the banking industry through the integration of resource-based view and dynamic capabilities. Journal of Strategy & Innovation, 36(1), 200540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsinno.2025.200540
- Martin, K. D., & Murphy, P. E. (2017). The role of data privacy in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45, 135-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-016-0495-4
- Binns, R., Van Kleek, M., Veale, M., Lyngs, U., Zhao, J., & Shadbolt, N. (2018, April). 'It's Reducing a Human Being to a Percentage': Perceptions of Justice in Algorithmic Decisions. In Proceedings of the 2018 Chi conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1- 14). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173951
- Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C., & Schepers, J. (2019). Service robot implementation: a theoretical framework and research agenda. The Service Industries Journal, 40(3–4), 203–225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2019.1672666
- Grewal, D., Hulland, J., Kopalle, P.K. et al. (2020) The future of technology and marketing: a multidisciplinary perspective. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 48, 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019- 00711-4
- Jayakumar, G. D. S., & Narsis, I. (2011). Physical and core services quality: State Bank of India. SCMS Journal of Indian Management, 8(4), 90. https://www.proquest.com/openview/e9f55e7b054a7c95b46e0f7eac0ca 35c/1?pq-origsite=gscholar