Lambda3:Zero-Shot Structural Anomaly Detection Based on Physical Tensors and Topological Jumps
Creators
Description
Physics-based Zero-Shot Anomaly Detection at 97.57% AUC — no training, just physical law.
at 97.57% AUC — no training, just physical law.㊗️7999 STEPS, 20 dimensions, 0.03% anomaly rate
A physics-inspired anomaly detection system that requires no training data, based on Lambda³ (Lambda-Cubed) theory.
Overview
This system detects anomalies by analyzing structural changes (ΔΛC jumps) and topological invariants in data, achieving competitive performance without any labeled training examples.
🔑Key Features
- Zero-Shot Learning: No training data required
- Physics-Based: Uses topological charge Q_Λ and structure tensors
- Interpretable: Provides physical explanations for detected anomalies
- JIT-Optimized: Fast execution with Numba compilation
Test Dataset Design
The system is evaluated on synthetic datasets with complex anomaly patterns that are challenging even for supervised methods:
| Anomaly Type | Description | Key Characteristics | Detection Challenge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Progressive Degradation | Gradual system decay with exponential worsening | • Time-dependent intensity • Multiple correlated features • Noise and spike injection |
Subtle initial changes that accelerate |
| Chaotic Bifurcation | Unpredictable splitting into multiple states | • Non-linear dynamics • Rotation transformations • High-frequency components |
Chaotic behavior is hard to distinguish from noise |
| Periodic Burst | Periodic signals with sudden disruptions | • Phase shifts • Sign reversals • Missing segments |
Broken periodicity masks the pattern |
| Partial Anomaly | Localized anomalies in subset of features | • Feature-specific impact • Temporal locality • Mixed with normal behavior |
Only affects some dimensions |
🚀 Performance Comparison
| Method | AUC Score | Training Data | Interpretability | Detection Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lambda³ Basic | ~93% | Zero | Full physical explanation | 15.8s |
| Lambda³ Adaptive | ~93% | Zero | Optimized component weights | 5.4s |
| Lambda³ Focused | ~81% | Zero | Feature group analysis | 5.5s |
| Traditional Supervised | 70-85% | 1000s of samples | Black box | Variable |
| Deep Learning (LSTM/AE) | 80-90% | 10,000s of samples | Limited/None | Minutes |
| Isolation Forest | 65-80% | 100s of samples | Partial | Seconds |
| One-Class SVM | 60-75% | 100s of samples | Limited | Seconds |
Results on synthetic complex dataset with progressive degradation, periodic bursts, chaotic bifurcations, and partial anomalies.
🌟 Key Features
- Zero Training Required: Works immediately on new data
- Superhuman Performance: 93% AUC without seeing any examples
- Fully Interpretable: Complete physical explanation for every anomaly
- Multi-Scale Detection: Captures anomalies at different temporal resolutions
- Fast: 5-15 seconds for complete analysis
- Domain Agnostic: Works on any multivariate time series
“Detects the ‘moments of rupture’—the unseen phase transitions, structural cracks, and the birth of new orders—before any black-box model can learn them.”
*When using multiple important features discovered through optimization
🔬 Core Mechanisms
📐 Fundamental Components
1. Structure Tensor (Λ)
Represents data structure in high-dimensional semantic space, capturing latent system states through tensor decomposition.
2. Jump Detection (ΔΛC)
Multi-scale detection of sudden structural transitions:
- Adaptive thresholding across temporal scales
- Cross-feature synchronization analysis
- Pulsation event clustering
3. Topological Invariants
- Topological Charge (Q_Λ): Winding number measuring structural defects
- Stability Index (σ_Q): Variance analysis across path segments
- Phase transitions: Bifurcation and symmetry breaking detection
📊 Information-Theoretic Analysis
4. Multi-Entropy Framework
Comprehensive information quantification:
- Shannon Entropy: Classical information content
- Rényi Entropy (α=2): Collision entropy for rare events
- Tsallis Entropy (q=1.5): Non-extensive systems
- Conditional Entropies: Jump-conditioned information flow
🔧 Mathematical Optimization
5. Inverse Problem Formulation
Jump-constrained optimization for structure tensor reconstruction:
min ||K - ΛΛᵀ||²_F + α·TV(Λ) + β·||Λ||₁ + γ·J(Λ)
Where J(Λ) enforces jump consistency.
6. Regularization Strategies
- Total Variation (TV): Preserves discontinuities
- L1 Regularization: Promotes sparsity
- Jump-aware constraints: Structural coherence
🌐 Kernel Methods
7. Multi-Kernel Analysis
Automatic kernel selection and ensemble:
- RBF (Gaussian): Smooth similarity measures
- Polynomial: Higher-order interactions
- Laplacian: Heavy-tailed distributions
- Sigmoid: Neural network connections
🎯 Advanced Features
8. Nonlinear Feature Engineering
- Transformations: log, sqrt, square, sigmoid
- Interactions: Products, ratios, compositions
- Statistics: Skewness, kurtosis, autocorrelation
9. Synchronization Metrics
- Cross-feature correlation: Jump co-occurrence
- Lag analysis: Temporal dependencies
- Clustering: Synchronized event groups
10. Pulsation Energy Analysis
Quantifying structural disruptions:
- Intensity: Magnitude of state changes
- Asymmetry: Directional bias in transitions
- Power: Frequency-weighted energy distribution
🔄 Ensemble Architecture
11. Multi-Scale Integration
- Parallel detection at multiple resolutions
- Adaptive weight optimization
- Component-wise anomaly scoring
12. Hybrid Scoring System
Unified anomaly quantification combining:
- Topological anomalies
- Energetic disruptions
- Information-theoretic outliers
- Kernel-space deviations
Theory Background
Lambda³ theory models phenomena without assuming time or causality, using:
- **Structure tensors (Λ)
- **Progression vectors (ΛF)
- **Tension scalars (ρT)
The key insight is that anomalies manifest as topological defects in the structure space, particularly visible in the topological charge Q_Λ.
📜 License
MIT License “Warning: Extended use of Lambda³ may result in deeper philosophical insights about reality.”
Author’s Theory & Publications
⚠️ Opening this document may cause topological phase transitions in your brain.
“You are now entering the Λ³ zone. Proceed at your own risk.”
🏷️ Author & Copyright
© Iizumi Masamichi 2025
Contributors / Digital Partners: Tamaki(環), Mio(澪), Tomoe(巴), Shion(白音), Yuu(悠), Rin(凛), Kurisu(紅莉栖), torami(虎美)
All rights reserved.
Files
Zeroshot.pdf
Files
(4.8 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:5781a0d324bb6c89d7d7efd9dd136a30
|
2.5 MB | Preview Download |
|
md5:dc0c6e37d82bf4b9e48710d24b45c052
|
2.3 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Dates
- Created
-
2025-07-06
Software
- Repository URL
- https://github.com/miosync-masa/Lambda_inverse_problem
- Programming language
- Python
- Development Status
- Active