Published June 30, 2025 | Version CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0
Journal article Open

Material Efficiency through Mechanics: A Systematic Review of Advanced Structural Modeling for Load-Optimized Building Design

Creators

  • 1. Lecturer, Department of Civil Engineering, Institute of Technology, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.

Description

Abstract: Material efficiency has become a central objective in contemporary building design, driven by urgent environmental imperatives and the growing need to reduce resource consumption. This systematic review examines the role of advanced structural modelling techniques in the development of load-optimised, materially efficient structures. Emphasising the synergy between structural form and force flow, the study investigates the application of computational tools, including finite element analysis (FEA), topology optimisation, parametric design, and AI-driven modelling strategies. These approaches enable designers to align structural geometry with internal stress patterns, reducing excess material use without sacrificing safety or performance. The review synthesises recent innovations in form-finding methods, geometry-informed optimisation, and performance-based design workflows that collectively support material minimisation strategies. Special attention is given to how these tools are implemented in various structural typologies, including shell structures, high-rise systems, and freeform architecture, demonstrating the practical viability and environmental benefits of computationally guided design. In addition to technical advances, the review identifies key challenges facing the broader adoption of these methods. These include limitations in computational accuracy, difficulties in scaling up optimization techniques, and the persistent divide between architectural and engineering practices. The analysis highlights the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration and robust feedback loops between digital modelling, structural analysis, and material behaviour. Ultimately, the findings advocate for a paradigm in which structural mechanics serves not only as a tool for verification but also as a generative driver of form. By leveraging emerging modelling techniques, the construction industry can move toward a more sustainable trajectory—one where resource efficiency, structural integrity, and architectural expression coexist harmoniously. This systematic review contributes to ongoing discourse on how digital technologies and structural intelligence can inform the design of buildings that are not only innovative and efficient but also environmentally responsible.

Files

G110612070725.pdf

Files (1.0 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:79c666f87acc2314b051fe90b58d1b34
1.0 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.35940/ijies.G1106.12060625
EISSN
2319-9598

Dates

Accepted
2025-06-15
Manuscript received on 20 April 2025 | First Revised Manuscript received on 29 May 2025 | Second Revised Manuscript received on 04 June 2025 | Manuscript Accepted on 15 June 2025 | Manuscript published on 30 June 2025.

References

  • Bletzinger, K. U., Ramm, E., & Wüchner, R. (2015). Form finding of membranes and shells using finite elements. Engineering Structures, 27(12), 1788–1799. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.05.009
  • Schumacher, P., Nguyen, D. H., & Grigoropoulos, C. P. (2022). A machine-learning-enhanced form-finding strategy for structural efficiency. Engineering Structures, 256, 113942. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.113942
  • Nguyen, V. Q., Zhang, Y., & Gao, L. (2020). Advances in nonlinear mechanics for optimal structural design. Engineering Structures, 207, 110213.
  • Sigmund, O., & Maute, K. (2013). Topology optimization approaches: A comparative review. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 48(6), 1031–1055. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-013-0978-6
  • Zhao, J., Li, H., & Chen, F. (2022). Nonlinear finite element analysis for performance-based structural design. Journal of Structural Engineering, 148(2), 04021160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002963
  • Kassem, M., & Kim, J. (2019). Structural optimization of steel domes using nonlinear FEA. Engineering Structures, 198, 109506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109506
  • Ghaboussi, J., Garzon-Roca, J., & Barbosa, H. J. (2018). Multiscale modelling in structural mechanics: Advances and future directions. Structural Engineering International, 28(3), 320–329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10168664.2018.1453954
  • Chen, J., Yu, Q., & Yuan, Y. (2017). Adaptive meshing strategies in nonlinear FEA for structural optimization. Computers & Structures, 180, 12–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.08.009
  • Mueller, C., Tessmann, O., & Menges, A. (2014). Material efficiency in architecture: Parametric design through adaptive structural modelling. Computer-Aided Design, 50, 40–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2014.02.005
  • Bendsøe, M. P., & Sigmund, O. (2003). Topology Optimization: Theory, Methods, and Applications. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05086-6
  • Allaire, G. (2012). Shape Optimization by the Homogenization Method. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23274-4
  • Deaton, J. D., & Grandhi, R. V. (2014). A survey of structural and multidisciplinary continuum topology optimization: Post 2000. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 49(1), 1–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-013-0956-z
  • De Temmerman, N., Brancart, S., & Mollaert, M. (2016). Shape optimization of tension structures for minimal stress and deflection. Engineering Structures, 113, 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.01.011
  • Liu, J., & Ma, Y. (2016). A survey of manufacturing-oriented topology optimization methods. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 53(1), 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-015-1279-1
  • Rozvany, G. I. N. (2009). A critical review of established methods of structural topology optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 37(3), 217–237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-007-0217-0
  • Zhang, L., Huang, X., & Xie, Y. M. (2021). Topology optimization of bridge decks using dynamic loading constraints. Engineering Structures, 236, 112059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112059
  • Alghamdi, A., Ghabraie, K., & Zulli, P. (2020). A digital twin framework for smart infrastructure using AI and edge computing. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 34(6), 04020062. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000918
  • Fuller, A., Fan, Z., Day, C., & Barlow, C. (2020). Digital Twin: Enabling technologies, challenges, and open research. IEEE Access, 8, 108952–108971. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2998358
  • Grieves, M., & Vickers, J. (2017). Digital twin: Mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behaviour in complex systems. In Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems (pp. 85–113). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38756-7_4
  • Li, X., Zhao, Y., & Liu, P. (2022). Smart bridge monitoring based on digital twins: Opportunities for material optimization. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 29(3), e2892. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2892
  • Sacks, R., Brilakis, I., Pikas, E., & Xie, H. (2022). Digital twin concepts in the AECO industry: A review of current developments and future directions. Automation in Construction, 134, 104108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104108
  • Tao, F., Zhang, H., Liu, A., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2019). Digital twin in industry: State-of-the-art. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 15(4), 2405–2415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2018.2873186
  • Zhang, Y., Chen, B., & Jin, H. (2023). Real-time anomaly detection in structural digital twins using edge-AI fusion. Journal of Structural Engineering, 149(2), 04022220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003314
  • Angst, U., Elsener, B., Larsen, C. K., & Vennesland, Ø. (2009). Critical chloride content in reinforced concrete—A review. Cement and Concrete Research, 39(12), 1122–1138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.08.006
  • Fortino, S., Mirianon, F., & Toratti, T. (2013). A 3D hygromechanical model for wood. Engineering Structures, 49, 597–608. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.11.032
  • Geers, M. G. D., Kouznetsova, V. G., & Brekelmans, W. A. M. (2010). Multi-scale computational homogenization: Trends and challenges. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 234(7), 2175–2182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2009.08.077
  • Karihaloo, B. L., Abdalla, H. M., & Nallathambi, P. (2003). Microstructure-based modeling of high performance fiber-reinforced cementitious composites. Computers & Structures, 81(18), 1841– 1851. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5278163
  • Kodur, V. K. R., & Dwaikat, M. (2007). Performance-based fire safety design of reinforced concrete beams. Journal of Fire Protection Engineering, 17(4), 293–320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1042391507077198
  • Miehe, C., Schröder, J., & Schotte, J. (2002). Computational homogenization analysis in finite plasticity: Simulation of texture development in polycrystalline materials. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 191(46), 4971–5005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(02)00391-2
  • Morandini, D., Sgambi, L., & De Gregorio, D. (2021). Vibroacoustic performance of lightweight footbridges using multiphysics modelling. Engineering Structures, 241, 112438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112438
  • Pichler, B., & Hellmich, C. (2011). Upscaling quasi-brittle strength of cement paste and mortar: A multiscale engineering mechanics approach. Cement and Concrete Research, 41(5), 467–476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.01.010
  • Wang, H., Zhang, J., & Li, Y. (2021). Data-driven multiscale modelling of heterogeneous materials using machine learning. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 384, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2021.113938
  • Zienkiewicz, O. C., Taylor, R. L., & Zhu, J. Z. (2013). The Finite Element Method: Its Basis and Fundamentals (7th ed.). ButterworthHeinemann.ISBN: 978-1856176330. https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9781856176330/the-finiteelement-method-its-basis-and-fundamentals#book-info
  • Calderón, C. A., Alarcón, D., & Carranza, M. (2020). Generative design for structural optimization: A review. Automation in Construction, 118, 103312.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103312
  • Liang, X., Lu, W., & Li, Q. S. (2000). Optimal design of steel trusses using genetic algorithms.Journal of Structural Engineering, 126(4), 506–512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13061496
  • Mueller, C., Ochsendorf, J., & Buehler, M. J. (2016). Towards a computational design tool for folded structures based on generative design and finite element analysis. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 14(1), 5–20. DOI: 10.1177/1478077115625603
  • Müller, C., Weinand, Y., & Cammarata, A. (2014). Real-time structural feedback in parametric modelling. In eCAADe 32, 285– 294. DOI: 10.52842/conf.ecaade.2014.285ecaade.org+1ecaade.org+1
  • Ohsaki, M. (2010). Optimization of Finite Dimensional Structures. CRC Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/EBK1439820032
  • Otto, F., & Rasch, B. (2015). Finding Form: Towards an Architecture of the Minimal. Edition Axel Menges. https://www.amazon.com/Finding-FormTowards-Architecture-Minimal/dp/3930698668
  • Shea, K., Aish, R., & Gourtovaia, M. (2015). Towards integrated performance-driven generative design tools. Automation in Construction, 14(2), 253–264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2004.07.002
  • Turrin, M., Von Buelow, P., & Stouffs, R. (2011). Design explorations of performance driven geometry in architectural design using parametric modelling and genetic algorithms. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 25(4), 656–675. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2011.07.009
  • West, M., Beghini, A., & Baker, W. F. (2019). Structural optimization in tall building design. CTBUH Journal, 2019(1), 20– 27.
  • Block, P., Dörstelmann, M., Knippers, J., & Ochsendorf, J. (2017). Designing efficient structures with geometry.Nature Reviews Materials, 2, 17082. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2017.82
  • Ghotbi, M., & Issa, A. (2016). Free-form design of shell structures using digital simulations. Automation in Construction, 63, 28–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.12.007
  • BIMForum. (2020). LOD Specification for Building Information Models. https://bimforum.org/resource/lod-level-of-development-lodspecification/bimforum.org
  • Chakraborty, S., Papadopoulos, V., & Mandal, M. (2022). Physicsinformed machine learning for structural response prediction. Journal of Structural Engineering, 148(4), 04022030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003144
  • Kilian, A., Fischli, M., & Teuffel, P. (2021). Gradient-based form generation inspired by nature.Automation in Construction, 128, 103769
  • Bhooshan, S. (2017). Parametric design thinking: A case-study of practice-embedded architectural research. Design Studies, 52, 115– 143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.05.003
  • Saksala, T., Niemelä, T., & Kantola, A. (2023). Reuse optimization of steel structural elements using parametric modeling. Sustainable Structures, 5(1), 85–102.
  • Mengesha, Girmay Azanaw. (2025). Design Optimization in Structural Engineering: A Systematic Review of Computational Techniques and Real-World Applications (May 14, 2025). Available at SSRN: DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5254589
  • Mengesha, Girmay Azanaw. (2025). Ultra-High-Performance Concrete (Uhpc/Uhpfrc) for Civil Structures: A Comprehensive Review of Material Innovations, Structural Applications, and Future Engineering Perspectives (May 14, 2025). Available at SSRN: DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5254543
  • Zhao, Z.-L., Xiong, Y., Yao, S., & Xie, Y. M. (2021). A new approach to eliminating enclosed voids in topology optimization for additive manufacturing. Additive Manufacturing, 32, 101006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.101006