There is a newer version of the record available.

Published April 21, 2024 | Version 4
Preprint Open

QuantoniumOS V3: Advanced Testing Suite for Symbolic Resonance Encryption

Authors/Creators

  • 1. independent researcher

Description

https://www.quantoniumos.com/

info@quantoniumos.com

This document supports U.S. Patent Application No. 19/169,399, titled “A Hybrid Computational Framework for Quantum and Resonance Simulation.” It includes symbolic XOR encryption using amplitude-phase modulation, a resonance-based Fourier transform (RFT), symbolic qubit simulation, Grover-style resonance search, and entropy functions derived from symbolic waveform decomposition. All mathematical content was formally submitted to the USPTO as part of a legally binding amendment and does not constitute new disclosure.

Technical info

QuantoniumOS V3 advances the symbolic resonance encryption framework by implementing a full-spectrum tamper validation and authenticity enforcement suite. Building on the perturbation sensitivity proven in V2, V3 introduces SHA-locked symbolic signatures, phase-locked timestamp enforcement, and container coherence thresholds for real-time forgery detection. Using the same 128-bit input format, 64 controlled perturbation tests (1 base + 32 plaintext flips + 31 key flips) were executed under strict 27-second symbolic phase intervals. Tamper logic was validated using ∆Wave Coherence and entropy drift, with no signature collisions observed. A minimum coherence of 0.006 and entropy floor of 0.01 confirm nonlinear symbolic collapse under input distortion. These results complete the security foundation laid in V1 and V2, establishing symbolic waveform cryptography as a measurable, reproducible, and non-repudiable encryption paradigm.

Files

v3 empirical testing.pdf

Files (323.0 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:b81c8319bac54ce4f3e9a484291b51ab
3.3 kB Preview Download
md5:0b61c1f0e59f7fe90c0973d536f2e418
319.8 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Dates

Accepted
2025-03-23
Initial public release via Zenodo

Software

Programming language
Python , C++
Development Status
Active

References

  • Luis, M. (2025). A Hybrid Computational Framework for Quantum and Resonance Simulation (v1.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15072877
  • Oppenheim, A. V., & Schafer, R. W. (2010). *Discrete-Time Signal Processing* (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall. NIST. (2015). FIPS PUB 180-4: Secure Hash Standard. U.S. Dept. of Commerce.
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Secure Hash Standard (SHS), FIPS PUB 180-4, U.S. Department of Commerce, 2015.
  • S. Mallat, A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing. Academic Press, 1999.
  • I. Daubechies, J. Lu, and H.-T. Wu, "Synchrosqueezed Wavelet Transforms: A Tool for Empirical Mode Decomposition-Like Decompositions," Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 237-261, 2011.
  • D. Alagic et al., "Status Report on the Second Round of the NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Stan- dardization Process," NISTIR 8309, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2022.
  • C. Peikert, "Lattice Cryptography for the Internet," Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 3-15, 2016.
  • D. B. Strukov et al., "The Missing Memristor Found," Nature, vol. 453, no. 7191, pp. 80-83, 2008.
  • H.-S. P. Wong, S. Raoux, S. Kim, J. Liang, J. P. Reifenberg, B. Rajendran, M. Asheghi, and K. E. Goodson, "Phase Change Memory," Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 98, no. 12, pp. 2201-2227, 2010.
  • C. Mead, Analog VLSI and Neural Systems. Addison-Wesley, 1990.
  • A. Shabani, A. Radu, C. Augustine, M. E. Fouda, and K. N. Salama, "Analog Computing: Challenges and Opportunities," IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, vol. 67, no. 10, pp. 3253-3268, 2020.
  • T. D. Ladd et al., "Quantum Computing," Nature, vol. 464, no. 7285, pp. 45-53, 2010