Published January 31, 2025 | Version 2
Journal article Open

An overview of civic engagement tools for rural communities

  • 1. Software Competence Center Hagenberg GmbH, Softwarepark 32a Hagenberg,, 4232, Austria
  • 2. ADRETS, 69 rue Carnot Gap, 05000, France
  • 3. Poliedra-Politecnico di Milano, G. Colombo 40 Milano, 20133, Italy
  • 4. University of Ljubljana, Trzaska cesta 25 Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia
  • 5. University of L'Aquila, Via Vetoio, L'Aquila, 67100, Italy
  • 6. Fondazione Bruno Kessler Via Sommarive, Povo, Trento, 18,38123, Italy

Description

In this research, we explore the role of civic engagement platforms as tools designed to connect various groups in rural areas for collaborative advancement and to support sustainable growth in their communities. We examine these platforms' essential features and influence on rural communities, conducting an overview to identify rural areas' primary challenges and the functionalities needed to address them. Our findings reveal that the long-term capability of these civic engagement platforms can bring beneficial changes in rural territories by offering a unified way of communication, collaboration, and decision-making. The study concludes with suggestions for future research.

Files

openreseurope-4-21126.pdf

Files (899.6 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:3d722678c2edc54dc3a70ce111c49227
899.6 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Funding

European Commission
SMART ERA - SMART community-led transition for Europe's Rural Areas 101084160

References

  • AlAwadhi S (2023). Trust as a leveraging factor for civic engagement. Electron Gov an Int J. doi:10.1504/EG.2023.10042953
  • Alayed F, Lutters WG (2015). Evaluating sense of community theory in civic engagement systems. doi:10.1145/2757401.2757459
  • Bassanelli S, Vasta N, Bucchiarone A (2022). Gamification for behavior change: a scientometric review. Acta Psychol (Amst). doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103657
  • Beranič T, Zamuda A, Brezočnik L (2019). Facilitating the digital transformation of villages. Central European Conference on Information and Intelligent Systems.
  • Boardman D, Casalegno F, Pomeroy S (2011). Locast civic media: extending civic engagement boundaries through mobile media and hyper-local conversations. PASSAT/SocialCom 2011, Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust (PASSAT), 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on and 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom), Boston, MA, USA, 9-11 Oct., 2011. doi:10.1109/PASSAT/SocialCom.2011.241
  • Boulianne S (2023). Standby ties that mobilize: social media platforms and civic engagement. Soc Sci Comput Rev. doi:10.1177/08944393211067687
  • Bringle RG, Studer M, Wilson J (2011). Designing programs with a purpose: to promote civic engagement for life. J Acad Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10805-011-9135-2
  • Chan M (2018). Digital communications and psychological well-being across the life span: examining the intervening roles of social capital and civic engagement. Telemat Inform. doi:10.1016/J.TELE.2018.05.003
  • Chen NTN, Dong F, Ball-Rokeach SJ (2012). Building a new media platform for local storytelling and civic engagement in ethnically diverse neighborhoods. New Media Soc. doi:10.1177/1461444811435640
  • Cvar N, Trilar J, Kos A (2020). The use of IoT technology in smart cities and smart villages: similarities, differences, and future prospects. Sensors (Basel). doi:10.3390/s20143897
  • Datyev IO, Fedorov AM, Shchur AL (2020). Framework for civic engagement analysis based on open social media data. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-51971-1_48
  • de Zúñiga HG, Valenzuela S (2011). The mediating path to a stronger citizenship: online and offline networks, weak ties, and civic engagement. Commun Res. doi:10.1177/0093650210384984
  • Deng G, Fei S (2023). Exploring the factors influencing online civic engagement in a smart city: the mediating roles of ICT self-efficacy and commitment to community. Comput Hum Behav. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107682
  • DePaula N, Fietkiewicz KJ, Froehlich TJ (2018). Challenges for social media: misinformation, free speech, civic engagement, and data regulations. Building & Sustaining an Ethical Future with Emerging Technology - Proceedings of the 81st ASIS&T Annual Meeting, ASIST 2018, Vancouver, BC, Canada, November 10-14, 2018. doi:10.1002/pra2.2018.14505501076
  • Desouza KC, Bhagwatwar A (2014). Technology-enabled participatory platforms for civic engagement: the case of U.S. cities. J Urban Technol. doi:10.1080/10630732.2014.954898
  • Escobar JEC, Vásquez Urriago AR (2014). Gamification: an effective mechanism to promote civic engagement and generate trust?. doi:10.1145/2691195.2691307
  • Hall A (1986). Community participation, and rural development. Community Participation, Social Development and the State.
  • Hanna JR, Ashby SR (2016). From design fiction to future models of community building and civic engagement. Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Gothenburg, Sweden, October 23 - 27, 2016. doi:10.1145/2971485.2993922
  • Harding M, Knowles B, Davies N (2015). HCI, civic engagement & trust. doi:10.1145/2702123.2702255
  • Hassan L (2017). Governments should play games: towards a framework for the gamification of civic engagement platforms. Simul Gaming. doi:10.1177/1046878116683581
  • Hassan L, Hamari J (2020). Gameful civic engagement: a review of the literature on gamification of e-participation. Gov Inf Q. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2020.101461
  • Hoch T, Martinez-Gil J, Pichler M (2024). Multi-stakeholder perspective on human-AI collaboration in industry 5.0. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-46452-2_23
  • Hodges CB (2004). Designing to motivate: motivational techniques to incorporate in e-learning experiences. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning.
  • Hofmann S, Pappas IO (2021). Understanding civic engagement on social media based on users' motivation to contribute. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-82824-0_3
  • Jiang J, Spencer L, Werner LC (2021). Public gratification palace: a framework for increased civic engagement. MAB20: 5th Media Architecture Biennale 2020, Amsterdam and Utrecht, The Netherlands, 28 June 2021 - 2 July 2021. doi:10.1145/3469410.3469423
  • Korten DC (1996). Civic engagement in creating future cities. Environ Urban. doi:10.1177/095624789600800110
  • Lehner U, Baldauf M, Eranti V (2014). Civic engagement meets pervasive gaming: towards long-term mobile participation. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI'14, Toronto, ON, Canada - April 26 - May 01, 2014, Extended Abstracts. doi:10.1145/2559206.2581270
  • Liu C, Balestrini M, Vilaza GN (2019). From social to civic: public engagement with IoT in places and communities. Social Internet of Things - Technology, Communications and Computing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-94659-7_10
  • Martinez-Gil J, Pichler M, Beranic T (2019). Framework for assessing the smartness maturity level of villages. New Trends in Databases and Information Systems, ADBIS 2019 Short Papers, Workshops BBIGAP, QAUCA, SemBDM, SIMPDA, M2P, MADEISD, and Doctoral Consortium, Bled, Slovenia, September 8-11, 2019, Proceedings. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-30278-8_48
  • Martinez-Gil J, Pichler M, Lentini G (2022). A digital platform to facilitate the resilience of rural territories. J Inf Knowl Manag. doi:10.1142/S0219649222500435
  • Martinez-Gil J, Pichler M, Turkanović M (2020). Framework for data analysis in the context of the smart villages. Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective - 9th International Conference, EGOVIS 2020, Bratislava, Slovakia, September 14-17, 2020, Proceedings. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58957-8_3
  • Min SJ (2007). Online vs. Face-to-Face deliberation: effects on civic engagement. J Comput Mediat Commun. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00377.x
  • Mindel M, Frankel L, Pronko LM (2016). Hands-on: transforming public consultation into civic engagement. Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering, CASCON 2016, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, October 31 - November 2, 2016.
  • Purdy SJ (2017). Internet use and civic engagement: a structural equation approach. Comput Hum Behav. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.011
  • Quinn AC, Ramasubramanian L (2007). Information technologies and civic engagement: perspectives from librarianship and planning. Gov Inf Q. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2006.08.005
  • Rehm S, Foth M, Mitchell P (2018). DoGood: examining gamification, civic engagement, and collective intelligence. AI Soc. doi:10.1007/s00146-017-0711-x
  • Robertson SP (null). Social media and civic engagement: history, theory, and practice. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-02223-4
  • Romano M, Dı́az P, Aedo I (2016). Emergency management and smart cities: civic engagement through gamification. Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management in Mediterranean Countries - Third International Conference, ISCRAM-med 2016, Madrid, Spain, October 26-28, 2016, Proceedings. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-47093-1_1
  • Rozanova J, Dosman D, de Jong Gierveld J (2008). Participation in rural contexts: community matters. Rural Ageing. doi:10.51952/9781847424037.ch008
  • Smith J (2014). Civic engagement tools for urban conservation. Reconnecting the City: The Historic Urban Landscape Approach and the Future of Urban Heritage. doi:10.1002/9781118383940.ch9
  • Stojanova S, Cvar N, Verhovnik J (2022). Rural digital innovation hubs as a paradigm for sustainable business models in Europe's rural areas. Sustainability. doi:10.3390/su142114620
  • Stojanova S, Lentini G, Niederer P (2021). Smart villages policies: past, present and future. Sustainability. doi:10.3390/su13041663
  • Thiel SK (2015a). Gamified participation: investigating the influence of game elements in civic engagement tools. Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers, UbiComp/ISWC Adjunct 2015, Osaka, Japan, September 7-11, 2015. doi:10.1145/2800835.2801659
  • Thiel SK (2015b). Investigating the influence of game elements in civic engagement. Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, CHI PLAY 2015, London, United Kingdom, October 5-7, 2015. doi:10.1145/2793107.2810282
  • Thomas D (2010). Enabling user participation in civic engagement web sites. Int J E Politics. doi:10.4018/jep.2010070103
  • Thompson J (2021). Watching together: local media and rural civic engagement. Rural Sociol. doi:10.1111/ruso.12383
  • Uslaner EM, Brown M (2005). Inequality, trust, and civic engagement. Am Polit Res. doi:10.1177/1532673X04271903
  • Warren AM, Sulaiman A, Jaafar NI (2013). Investigating civic engagement in social media. 17th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, PACIS 2013, Jeju Island, Korea, June 18 22, 2013.
  • Whitacre BE, Manlove JL (2016). Broadband and civic engagement in rural areas: what matters?. Community Dev. doi:10.1080/15575330.2016.1212910
  • Zavratnik V, Kos A, Stojmenova Duh E (2018). Smart villages: comprehensive review of initiatives and practices. Sustainability. doi:10.3390/su10072559