Published November 30, 2024 | Version CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0
Journal article Open

Analysing the Impact and Efficacy of Telemedicine through Data Analysis

  • 1. Assistant Professor, Department of CSE, Quantum University, Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India.

Contributors

Contact person:

  • 1. Assistant Professor, Department of CSE, Quantum University, Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India.

Description

Abstract: Telemedicine has become a crucial aspect of modern healthcare, utilizing digital communication technologies to offer remote medical services. This research examines the implementation, impact, and challenges of telemedicine, with a focus on data analysis to evaluate its effectiveness and future potential [1]. Through comprehensive analysis of patient data, service utilization, and outcomes, this study aims to highlight telemedicine's strengths and areas for improvement. Telemedicine’s significance grew notably during the COVID-19 pandemic, underscoring the need to evaluate its impact on healthcare. This paper assesses telemedicine by analysing patient outcomes, service utilization, and patient satisfaction, identifying key areas for policy and practice enhancement. Findings indicate substantial improvements in accessibility and patient satisfaction, though technological and equitable access barriers persist. The rapid evolution of telemedicine is reshaping healthcare delivery; through data analysis, this study explores telemedicine’s role and potential in modern healthcare. Leveraging a diverse dataset, statistical and machine learning techniques are applied to uncover significant patterns and insights. Results show marked improvements in access, patient satisfaction, and cost savings for both patients and providers, while challenges such as technology adoption and digital literacy gaps remain critical. The adoption of telemedicine has accelerated significantly, transforming healthcare delivery and accessibility [2]. This study investigates the impact and efficacy of telemedicine by leveraging data analysis to evaluate its outcomes on patient health, access to care, cost efficiency, and patient satisfaction. Data were collected from a variety of sources, including patient records, survey responses, and healthcare cost reports, covering a diverse patient population across different demographics and regions. Key metrics such as treatment adherence, recovery rates, consultation frequency, and cost reduction were analysed. The findings reveal that telemedicine generally improves access to healthcare, particularly for rural and underserved populations, and can reduce healthcare costs by minimizing the need for in-person visits. However, challenges such as limited access to technology, variability in patient outcomes, and disparities in healthcare quality were identified. This analysis provides insights into the strengths and limitations of telemedicine, suggesting strategies for improving its efficacy and equitable access. The study underscores the need for ongoing research to optimize telemedicine's role in modern healthcare systems [3].

Files

F104604060924.pdf

Files (412.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:aab00ce293918a408271536102e174b6
412.1 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.54105/ijpmh.F1046.0501124
EISSN
2582-7588

Dates

Accepted
2024-11-15
Manuscript received on 21 August 2024 | Revised Manuscript received on 02 November 2024 | Manuscript Accepted on 15 November 2024 | Manuscript published on 30 November 2024.

References

  • Smith, A. C., Thomas, E., Snoswell, C. L., Haydon, H., Mehrotra, A., Clemensen, J., & Caffery, L. J. (2020). Telehealth for global emergencies: Implications for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 26(5), 309- 313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X20916567
  • Kruse, C. S., Krowski, N., Rodriguez, B., Tran, L., Vela, J., & Brooks, M. (2017). Telehealth and patient satisfaction: a systematic review and narrative analysis. BMJ Open, 7(8), e016242. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016242
  • Dorsey, E. R., & Topol, E. J. (2020). State of Telehealth. The New England Journal of Medicine, 375(2), 154-161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1601705
  • Kruse, C. S., Karem, P., Shifflett, K., Vegi, L., Ravi, K., & Brooks, M. (2018). Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: A systematic review. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 24(1), 4-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X16674087.
  • Dorsey, E. R., & Topol, E. J. (2016). State of Telehealth. New England Journal of Medicine, 375, 154-161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1601705
  • Flodgren, G., Rachas, A., Farmer, A. J., Inzitari, M., & Shepperd, S. (2015). Interactive telemedicine: Effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (9). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002098.pub2
  • Bashshur, R., Shannon, G., Krupinski, E., & Grigsby, J. (2013). The History of Telemedicine: Evolution, Context, and Transformation. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2010.16.1.65
  • Wootton, R., & Batch, J. (Eds.). (2012). Telepediatrics: Telemedicine and Child Health. Springer. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2020.587452
  • World Health Organization. (2010). Telemedicine: Opportunities and developments in Member States: Report on the second global survey on eHealth. Global Observatory for eHealth Series, 2. doi: https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2012.18.2.153
  • American Medical Association. (2020). AMA Digital Health Research: Physician Adoption of Digital Health Tools. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-0231-9
  • Reed, M. E., Huang, J., Graetz, I., Lee, C., Muelly, E., Kennedy, C., & Kim, E. (2020). Patient characteristics associated with choosing a telemedicine visit vs. office visit with the same primary care clinicians. JAMA Network Open, 3(6), e205873. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5873
  • Uscher-Pines, L., & Mehrotra, A. (2014). Analysis of Teladoc use seems to indicate expanded access to care for patients without prior connection to a provider. Health Affairs, 33(2), 258-264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0989.
  • Kumar M., Pandey K.M., The Impact of IoT on Smart Home Energy Management. International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering (IJSCE). Vol-13, Issue-5, November 2023, Page no 7-12, https://doi.org/10.35940/ijsce.D3647.13051123
  • Bini, S. A. (2018). Artificial intelligence, machine learning, deep learning, and cognitive computing: What do these terms mean and how will they impact health care? The Journal of Arthroplasty, 33(8), 2358- 2361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.067
  • Kumar, S., & Snooks, H. (2011). Triage and remote management of emergency ambulance services assisted by telemedicine: A systematic review of the literature. Emergency Medicine Journal, 28(7), 591-595. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.2010.045177.
  • Bashshur, R. L., Shannon, G. W., Krupinski, E. A., & Grigsby, J. (2013). The empirical foundations of telemedicine interventions for chronic disease management. Telemedicine and e-Health, 19(5), 323-358. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2014.9981.
  • Krukowski, R. A., & Hare, M. (2020). The transition from face-to-face to telehealth: Implications for healthcare delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic. American Journal of Public Health, 110(9), 1358-1360. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-021-02720-1
  • Keesara, S., Jonas, A., & Schulman, K. (2020). Covid-19 and health care's digital revolution. New England Journal of Medicine, 382(23), e82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2005835
  • Pflugeisen, B. M., McCarren, C., Poore, S., Carlile, M., & Schroeder, R. (2016). Virtual visits: Managing prenatal care with modern technology. MCN: The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, 41(1), 24-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NMC.0000000000000199
  • Kruse, C. S., Krowski, N., Rodriguez, B., Tran, L., Vela, J., & Brooks, M. (2017). Telehealth and patient satisfaction: A systematic review and narrative analysis. BMJ Open, 7(8), e016242. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016242
  • Totten, A. M., Womack, D. M., Eden, K. B., McDonagh, M. S., Griffin, J. C., Grusing, S., & Hersh, W. R. (2016). Telehealth: Mapping the evidence for patient outcomes from systematic reviews. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2023.149118
  • M.R, Dr. R., & Ramakrishan, N. (2023). Distance Does Not Matter any Longer - India Emerges as a Leader in Telehealth. In International Journal of Preventive Medicine and Health (Vol. 3, Issue 5, pp. 1–13). Doi: https://doi.org/10.54105/ijpmh.e1023.073523
  • Hazarathaiah, A., & Rao, Dr. B. P. (2019). Image Compression for Telemedicine using New Wavelets and Modified EZW. In International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (Vol. 8, Issue 9, pp. 2506–2512). Doi: https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.i8180.078919
  • Viswanathan, V., Elango, B., & Yugapriya, S. (2019). Authorship Trends in Telemedicine Research. In International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE) (Vol. 8, Issue 2, pp. 3030–3036). Doi: https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.b3035.078219
  • S, A. K., Wadhwa, A., & Gramle, Dr. A. (2021). Perception of Health Care Professionals (HCPs) on Telemedicine in India. In International Journal of Management and Humanities (Vol. 5, Issue 8, pp. 10–14). Doi: https://doi.org/10.35940/ijmh.f1284.045821
  • Midasala, V., Prakash, H. M. S., abhilash, T., & Rohit, L. (2019). TeleHealthcare Unit for Remote Patient Monitoring. In International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (Vol. 9, Issue 2, pp. 2902– 2904). Doi: https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.b3955.129219