Published November 21, 2024 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Managing multiple threats: Evaluating the efficacy of broad-scale introduced predator management in improving native mammal resilience to fire

  • 1. ROR icon University of Melbourne
  • 2. CSIRO
  • 3. CSIRO Land and Water
  • 4. department of energy, environment and climate action

Description

Preventing further biodiversity loss requires understanding which processes threaten biodiversity and the effectiveness of management actions in mitigating them. Threatening processes can interact in complex and unexpected ways, but different threats are often managed independently. Here, we develop a conceptual model to identify the conditions needed for management of a single threat to achieve a net conservation benefit in systems with multiple interacting threats, and demonstrate its relevance in a replicated case-study experiment. In Australia, introduced red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and feral cats (Felis catus) may hunt vulnerable native mammals more effectively after fire, due to loss of understory vegetation. However, the efficacy of broad-scale control of introduced predators in improving native mammal resilience to fire has not been quantified. Moreover, many studies assessing the impacts of prescribed fire on species rely on a much smaller number of independent replicates. Using a natural before-after control-impact experiment with 14 prescribed fires, each > 200 ha, we tested whether existing landscape-scale fox baiting programs influenced the immediate effects of prescribed fire on these two introduced predators and five medium-sized native mammals, including the threatened long-nosed potoroo (Potorous tridactylus) and southern brown bandicoot (Isoodon obesulus). Fox occupancy increased across both treatments post-fire, but baiting reduced the magnitude of increase. In contrast, mean feral cat occupancy remained constant in unbaited areas post-fire, but nearly doubled in fox-controlled areas, possibly due to a mesopredator release. Existing landscape-scale fox control programs did not clearly improve the short-term resilience of native mammals to prescribed fire (at least under the current fire and fox management regimes in our study landscapes). These results likely emphasise the need to integrate fire and predator management strategies for threatened faunal conservation iIn the presence of acute disturbances such as fire, threatened native mammals may require more intensive and integrated management of fire and introduced predators, such as  (e.g., through more intensive targeted predator controlbaiting around fire events, or intensive protection usingthrough natural or artificial refuges).

Files

code_final.zip

Files (53.2 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:73b4b30a26aaca89c70b9f1eb9e4d39b
27.7 kB Preview Download
md5:a713113ab0dcbb615ef91656fcf7145a
25.5 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Funding

Australian Research Council
Linkage Projects - Grant ID: LP170101134 LP170101134

Software

Programming language
R
Development Status
Active