Challenges in Standardizing Terminologies for Data Management in Scientific Research
Creators
-
David, Romain
(Researcher)1
-
Bage, Anne-Sophie
(Researcher)2
-
Aubin, Sophie
(Researcher)2
-
Corrêa, Pedro Luiz Pizzigatti
(Researcher)3, 4
-
Genova, Francoise
(Researcher)5
-
Hienola, Anca
(Researcher)6
-
Le Bras, Yvan
(Researcher)7
-
Lehtsalu, Liise
-
Morand, Elisabeth
(Researcher)8
-
Millar, Paul
(Researcher)9
-
Nentwich, Melanie
(Researcher)9
-
Specht, Alison
(Researcher)10
-
Turboust, Théophile
(Project member)1, 11
-
1.
European Research Infrastructure on Highly Pathogenic Agents
-
2.
Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement
- 3. Department of Computer and Digital Systems - Escola Politécnica da Universidade de São Paulo
-
4.
Universidade de São Paulo
-
5.
Université de Strasbourg
-
6.
Finnish Meteorological Institute
-
7.
MNHN, Station de Biologie Marine, Museum
-
8.
Institut national d'études démographiques
-
9.
Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY
-
10.
University of Queensland, School of Biological Sciences
-
11.
College of Europe
Description
Effective data management in the scientific community requires standardized terminologies aligned with the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) principles. This poster highlights key challenges in establishing these terminologies, essential for data management professionals, policy statements, project submissions, data management plans, data dictionaries, and repositories.
Polysemy, where terms have multiple meanings, leads to ambiguity and inconsistencies. Examples include distinctions between roles such as Data Owner, Data Steward, Data Custodian, and Data Manager.
Standardizing terminologies enhances clarity, reduces errors, and improves overall data management quality.
Key Challenges:
-
How to reuse and/or develop standardized terms for essential data management practices and tools.
-
Address polysemy, provide clear examples to avoid confusion among stakeholders.
-
Identify gaps in existing glossaries, particularly regarding data ownership and intellectual property, and organize crosswalk processes.
-
Discuss governance mechanisms for maintaining and updating terminologies across projects and institutions.
-
Formulate terminologies for cataloging services and skills, improving clarity and communication.
-
Enhance data management quality through better terminologies:
-
Promote, reuse and develop terminologies that directly contribute to higher quality data management practices.
-
Ensure terminologies support the FAIR principles to enhance data reliability, reproducibility, and usability.
-
Disseminate the usefulness of defining, maintaining and using terminologies in the general and disciplinary communities.
By providing interdisciplinary examples, this poster aims to highlight terminological challenges and foster discussions on potential solutions to improve data management practices within the scientific community. The poster will also aid communication in the dedicated session and in preparing an open paper on the topic.
Files
23_FINAL_1200_2000pxPDSig_RDAPlenary23_QofDM_PosterCosta_Rica_V2.0_30102024_20_00.pptx.pdf
Files
(3.8 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:6ddafe24578a262ab5cfee4b9c7cabcf
|
1.7 MB | Preview Download |
|
md5:1dadad70ed4688d63e4a85d6187739fa
|
2.0 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- David, R., Bouveret, L., Coché, L., et al., 2021. "Data dictionary cookbook for research data and software interoperability at global scale (1.0)." Research Data Alliance Plenary 17 (RDA P17), Edinburgh, remotely. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4683066