Two Major Challenges in Assessment Processes at Secondary Level in Bangladesh: Rote-memorization and High-stakes Examinations
Creators
Description
The secondary education system in Bangladesh faces significant challenges due to its reliance on rote memorization and high-stakes examinations, which hinder the development of critical thinking and place considerable pressure on students. This study investigates the problematic nature of these assessment practices, including the limited opportunities for students to engage in creative and independent thought and the resulting stress from high-stakes exams. To address these issues, we propose two innovative solutions: an Integrated Assessment Framework that emphasizes critical thinking and a Continuous and Comprehensive Assessment (CCA) approach that reduces the weight of single exams. These frameworks prioritize a variety of assessment methods, including project-based assessments, formative evaluations, and performance-based assessments. Although implementing these changes requires overcoming substantial constraints, such as traditional mindsets, resource limitations, and policy reforms, we argue that government support, teacher empowerment, and community engagement can pave the way for a more effective and holistic evaluation system. By adopting these approaches, Bangladesh can foster a secondary education system that better prepares students for the complexities of the modern world.
Files
Two Major Challenges in Assessment Processes at Secondary Level in Bangladesh.pdf
Files
(357.8 kB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:c61a1c3ebd227497a7e3d3d1e5c59676
|
357.8 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Dates
- Created
-
2024-10-31
References
- Angelo, T. A. (1995). Classroom Assessment for Critical Thinking. Teaching of Psychology, 22(1), 6–7. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top2201_1Chopra, V., & Bhatia, R. (2021). Practices of Teachers' in Implementing Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluationan Exploratory Study. MIER Journal of Educational Studies Trends & Practices, 16–32. https://doi.org/10.52634/mier/2014/v4/i1/1480Heissel, J. A., Adam, E. K., Doleac, J. L., Figlio, D. N., & Meer, J. (2019). Testing, Stress, and Performance: How Students Respond Physiologically to High-Stakes Testing. Education Finance and Policy, 16(2), 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00306Iqbal, J., & Ahmad, A. (2015). EFFECT OF EXTENSIVE ROTE LEARNING EXPERIENCE ON SUBSEQUENT ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT. Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal, 65(4), 510–514. https://pafmj.org/index.php/PAFMJ/article/view/998Mohiuddin, G. (2015). A study on educational assessment of secondary and higher secondary teachers of Bangladesh. World Scientific News, 16, 75–95.Poddar, R., & Mizan, M. M. R. (2020). Alternative assessment practices in secondary schools in Bangladesh. The EDRC Journal of Learning and Teaching, 6(3), 22–33.Rahman, M. M. (2018). Teachers' Perceptions and Practices of Classroom Assessment in Secondary School Science Classes in Bangladesh. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 7(6), 254–263. https://doi.org/10.21275/art20183034Singh, N., & Pany, S. (2016). Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation: A Paradigm Shift in Evaluation. In Online International Interdisciplinary Research Journal. https://kr.cup.edu.in/bitstream/handle/32116/516/Article%2030.pdf?sequence=1