Conception and Initial Results of a Systematic Mapping of OER Stakeholders in German Education

This paper presents the theoretical and methodological approach of a stakeholder mapping study in the field of open educational resources (OER) in Germany. The study is a component of the OERinfo project, which is funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research as the central information office for OER in Germany (www.o-e-r.de). The objective of the mapping study is to identify new actors and communities in diverse educational domains that have limited prior engagement with OER. These groups are later to be introduced to the discussion and communities surrounding OER and Open Educational Practices (OEP) through information and advisory services by OERinfo its partners. Overall, this approach aims to promote the mainstreaming of OER and OEP across all educational sectors.

OER are essentially defined as openly available and reusable, mainly digital learning, teaching and research materials (UNESCO, 2019; Zawacki-Richter et al., 2023), while OEP are defined „as practices which support the (re)use and production of OER through institutional policies, promote innovative pedagogical models, and respect and empower learners as co-producers on their lifelong learning path“ (Ehlers, 2011, p. 6).

The assumed benefits of OER are that the improved accessibility, adoption and adaptability of learning materials increase the quality and efficiency of education (Janssen et al., 2023). Learning settings and educational programs can thus be better adapted to the needs of different learners, collaboration between and within institutions is promoted, and educational innovation is encouraged (Janssen et al., 2023). On the level of educational processes, OER stand for an ecosystem-focused approach in which the learner's learning environment is given special consideration (Janssen et al., 2023). It is also assumed that OER help to develop collaborative and participatory learning arrangements (Otto, 2020). On a global level, OER are seen as an important prerequisite for building inclusive knowledge societies and achieving UNESCO Sustainable Development Goal 4, which aims to "ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all" (UNESCO, 2019, p. 4).

Despite these expectations, and despite the boost of digitalization in education in many countries caused by the COVID 19-pandemic, OER have not yet spread in education systems and educational practice to the extent hoped for – both globally (Janssen et al., 2023), but especially in Germany (Orr et al., 2018). The following reasons are cited as the main obstacles: Users being overwhelmed by legal issues (Otto, 2019), lack of appropriate OER policies, funding problems, lacking knowledge and skills about using, developing and publishing OER, worries about additional time investment (Janssen et al., 2023), and uncertainty over the quality and appropriateness of the content (Zawacki-Richter et al., 2023). The OERinfo project attempts to help break down these barriers with its information and advisory measures. However, in order to reach the right target groups, the mapping of OER stakeholders presented here is planned.

There are already various mapping and overview studies on the status of the adoption and use of OER by educational stakeholders in Germany (Ebner et al., 2015; Orr et al., 2018) as well as a comprehensive collection of people, projects, organizations and offers in the field of OER through the OER World Map (Neumann & Muuß-Merholz, 2017; Mollenhauer & Grimm, 2023). However, these studies and sources concentrate primarily on presenting active players and existing offers in the OER sector, so that they provide only few clues for the identification of specific desiderata groups. Since such groups are not explicitly visible through activities, projects or publications in connection with OER, a comprehensive and up-to-date view on educational institutions and actors in Germany is necessary. This is what the presented mapping study aims to achieve.

Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources Used

The aim of the systematic mapping is to provide a structured representation of the field of educational institutions, organizations and stakeholders in Germany based on their connection to the topic of OER. The methodological approach of the study is based on methods of stakeholder analysis and stakeholder mapping, using specific approaches aligned to the areas of digitalization and OER (Benjamin & Levinson, 1993; Wang & Wang, 2018).

First step of the analysis is an examination of individual stakeholders with regard to factors like influence on the respective professional community, specific interest in OER, potential benefits through OER, field-specific challenges, and existing activities related to OER (Wang & Wang, 2018). The next step is to cluster the stakeholders into communities, taking into account the analyzed characteristics, and to identify key stakeholders of the desiderate groups for the subsequent placement of information and advisory measures by the OERinfo information office.

In order to obtain a systematic overview of the relevant educational institutions and stakeholders, the database for the analysis is compiled from data from the German Education Server, the OER World Map, data sets from cooperation partners and supplementary research.

At the time of submission, the mapping study is in the preparatory phase, which includes the conception of the framework and the compilation of the database. The next step is to finalize the analysis criteria and test them on the data, in order to start implementing the analysis and mapping process from mid-2024.

Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or Findings

Purpose of the presented stakeholder mapping study in the field of Open Educational Resources (OER) is to identify desiderate groups with regard to OER in various areas of education in Germany, and to address them with information and advisory services in a subsequent step. The overarching aim of the study and the subsequent measures is to promote OER in all areas of education. The result of the mapping study should therefore be a comprehensive and systematically generated overview of professional communities in the field of education on a national level, that indicate potentials and needs regarding the utilization and production of OER. In addition, the results and the generated data set can provide a basis for other mapping studies with comparable objectives in other regions and with different specific questions.

At the conference, the aims of the study, the theoretical and methodological design and initial interim results will be presented and discussed.

References

Benjamin, R. I. & Levinson, E. (1993). A framework for managing IT-enabled change. MIT Sloan Management Review, 34(4), 23-33.

Ebner, M., Köpf, E., Muuß-Merholz, J., Schön, M., Schön, S., & Weichert, N. (2015). Mapping OER. Ist-Analyse zu freien Bildungsmaterialien (OER). Die Situation von freien Bildungsmaterialien (OER) in Deutschland in den Bildungsbereichen Schule, Hochschule, berufliche Bildung und Weiterbildung im Juni 2015. Wikimedia Deutschland e.V.

Ehlers, U.-D. (2011). Extending the territory: From open educational resources to open educational practices. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 15(2), 1–10.

Janssen, B., Schuwer, R., & Orr, D. (2023). Key Policy Issues in Open Educational Resources. Paper commissioned for the 2023 Global Education Monitoring Report, Technology in Education. UNESCO.

Mollenhauer, L. & Grimm, S. (2023, October 16–18). From Grassroot to Government: The Case of OER Policy in Germany and the ReEmergence of the OER World Map [Conference presentation]. Open Education Global Conference, Edmonton, Canada.

Neumann, J. & Muuß-Merholz, J. (2017). OER Atlas 2017 Open Educational Resources – Deutschsprachige Angebote und Projekte im Überblick. Hochschulbibliothekszentrum des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen (hbz)/Zentralstelle für Lernen und Lehren im 21 . Jahrhundert e. V.

Orr, D., Neumann, J., & Muuß-Merholz, J. (2018). OER in Deutschland: Praxis und Politik. Bottom-Up-Aktivitäten und Top-DownInitiativen. UNESCO/hbz.

Otto, D. (2019). Adoption and diffusion of open educational resources (OER) in education: A meta-analysis of 25 OER-projects. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(5), 122–140. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.4472

Otto, D. (2020). Grosse Erwartungen: Die Rolle von Einstellungen bei der Nutzung und Verbreitung von Open Educational Resources. MedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung, 2020 (Occasional papers), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.21240/ mpaed/00/2020.02.26.X.

UNESCO (2019). Recommendation on Open Educational Resources (OER). https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/recommendationopen-educational-resources-oer

Wang, S. & Wang, H. (2018). Sustainable open educational re-sources (OER) in higher education: A stakeholder analysis approach. Journal of Teaching and Education, 8(2), 119–128.

Zawacki-Richter, O., Müskens, W., & Marín, V. I. (2023). Quality Assurance of Open Educational Resources. In O. Zawacki-Richter & I. Jung (Eds.), Handbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education (pp. 1–19). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0351-9_43-1