Global greenhouse gas reconciliation 2022
Creators
- 1. Department of Earth System Science, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth System Modeling, Institute for Global Change Studies, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
- 2. Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, IPSL, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
- 3. College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, P. R. China
- 4. Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement
- 5. Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines
- 6. Norwegian Institute for Air Research (NILU), Kjeller, Norway
Description
In this study, we provide an update of the methodology and data used by Deng et al. (2022) in order to compare the latest national greenhouse gas inventories (NGHGIs) and atmospheric inversion models ensembles contributed by international research teams coordinated by the Global Carbon Project to support the first global stocktake of the Paris Agreement. The comparison framework uses transparent processing of the net ecosystem exchange fluxes of carbon dioxide (CO2) from inversions to provide estimates of terrestrial carbon stock changes over managed land that can be used to evaluate NGHGIs. For methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O), we separate anthropogenic emissions from natural ones from original inversion results, to make them comparable with NGHGIs. Our global harmonized NGHGIs database was updated for inventory data until Feburary 2023 by compiling data from periodical UNFCCC inventories by Annex I countries and sporadic and less detailed emissions reports by non-Annex I countries given by National Communications and Biennial Update Reports. For the inversion data, we updated results from an ensemble of 22 global inversions produced for the most recent assessments of the global budgets of CO2, CH4 and N2O coordinated by the Global Carbon Project with ancillary data. The CO2 inversion ensemble in this study goes through 2021, building on our previous report from 1990 to 2019, and includes three new satellite inversions compared to the previous study, and an improved managed land mask. As a result, although significant differences exist between the CO2 inversion estimates, both satellite and in-situ inversions over managed lands indicate that Russia and Canada had a larger land carbon sink in recent years than reported in its NGHGI, while the NGHGIs reported a significant upward trend of carbon sink in Russia but a downward trend in Canada. For CH4 and N2O, the results of the new inversion ensemble are extended to 2020. Good correlation was found between the in-situ and satellite inversions for CH4. Much denser sampling of atmospheric CO2 and CH4 concentrations by different satellites, coordinated into a global constellation, is expected in the coming years. The methodology proposed here to compare inversion results with NGHGIs can be applied regularly for monitoring the effectiveness of mitigation policy and progress by countries to meet the objective of their pledges.
Files
README.md
Files
(5.7 MB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:f0a0825d17380fa02d3b95e4d8e8ada4
|
3.0 MB | Preview Download |
md5:b0c6edb121a033bc58ab153219432a1f
|
669.2 kB | Preview Download |
md5:55103cbacaf34465011b7d3e51623ff5
|
136.6 kB | Preview Download |
md5:e29205b2fd4ba2eb849fda84c649cfc9
|
1.1 MB | Preview Download |
md5:b0995f858173727ccbc87c53d036e2c7
|
799.7 kB | Preview Download |
md5:3a004a0ab3009112af0fec55ea6b4217
|
1.9 kB | Preview Download |