Systematic review: locating qualitative academic publications for reviewing tenants' and landlords' renting experiences and interaction in the Majority World
Authors/Creators
- 1. Urban Studies, University of Glasgow, 25-29 Bute Gardens Glasgow, Scotland, G12 8RS, UK
Description
This methodological protocol describes the step-by-step process of identifying the relevant international academic literature to be reviewed within the project 'The affective economies of emerging private renting markets: understanding tenants and landlords in postcommunist Romania" (AFFECTIVE-PRS). It presents: (1) the preliminary decisions taken related to the breadth of the review (choice of databases, type of research, type of reference, searching fields); (2) the operationalisation of keywords and Boolean strings; (3) the further calibration of the searching parameters through piloting; (4) the final retrieval of relevant references through systematic and manual searches; and (5) the geographical coverage of the retained literature. While the paper demonstrates the rigour of the methodological approach taken, it also opens up the space for other scholars to scrutinise, replicate or adjust this approach to their own work.
Files
openreseurope-4-19705.pdf
Files
(1.0 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:c57c1a3681e3624528c369964fa26949
|
1.0 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- Arksey H, O'Malley L (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616
- Barnett-Page E, Thomas J (2009). Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. BMC Med Res Methodol. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-9-59
- Carroll C, Booth A, Cooper K (2011). A worked example of "best fit" framework synthesis: a systematic review of views concerning the taking of some potential chemopreventive agents. BMC Med Res Methodol. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-29
- Cooke A, Smith D, Booth A (2012). Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qual Health Res. doi:10.1177/1049732312452938
- Chisholm E, Howden-Chapman P, Fougere G (2020). Tenants' responses to substandard housing: hidden and invisible power and the failure of rental housing regulation. Housing, Theory and Society. doi:10.1080/14036096.2018.1538019
- Depraetere J, Vandeviver C, Keygnaert I (2021). The critical interpretive synthesis: an assessment of reporting practices. Int J Soc Res Methodol. doi:10.1080/13645579.2020.1799637
- Erasmus E, Orgill M, Schneider H (2014). Mapping the existing body of health policy implementation research in lower income settings: what is covered and what are the gaps?. Health Policy Plan. doi:10.1093/heapol/czu063
- Evans J, Benefield P (2001). Systematic reviews of educational research: does the Medical Model fit?. Br Educ Res J. doi:10.1080/01411920120095717
- Farias L, Laliberte Rudman D (2016). A critical interpretive synthesis of the uptake of critical perspectives in occupational science. J Occup Sci. doi:10.1080/14427591.2014.989893
- Garnham L, Rolfe S (2019). Tenant participation in the private rented sector. A review of existing evidence.
- Gilbert A (2016). Rental housing: the international experience. Habitat International. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.11.025
- Kholodilin K (2020). Long-term, multicountry perspective on rental market regulations. Hous Policy Debate. doi:10.1080/10511482.2020.1789889
- Lee H, Tamminen KA, Clark AM (2015). A meta-study of qualitative research examining determinants of children's independent active free play. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. doi:10.1186/s12966-015-0165-9
- Liu Y, Wang P, He Z (2021). Real estate rental market: a 10-year bibliometric-based review. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja. doi:10.1080/1331677X.2020.1848605
- McCarthy L, Simcock T (2024). Pets and private renting: a rapid evidence review of the barriers, benefits, and challenges. International Journal of Housing Policy. doi:10.1080/19491247.2024.2308711
- Morris A, Hulse K, Pawson H (2021). The private rental sector in Australia: living with uncertainty. doi:10.1007/978-981-33-6672-5
- Rakodi C (1995). Rental tenure in the cities of developing countries. Urban Studies.
- Rolfe S, McKee K, Feather J (2023). The role of private landlords in making a rented house a home. International Journal of Housing Policy. doi:10.1080/19491247.2021.2019882
- Simone A, Fauzan AU (2013). Majority time: operations in the Midst of Jakarta. Sociol Rev. doi:10.1111/1467-954X.12056
- Soaita AM (2018a). Literature mapping on housing taxation in the UK and other OECD Countries.
- Soaita AM (2018b). Mapping the literature of 'policy transfer' and housing.
- Soaita AM (2023). Critical interpretative synthesis: process protocol - locating publications for reviewing (Briefing Paper 1). doi:10.5281/zenodo.7566096
- Soaita AM (2024). Systematic review: prisma checklist and flow diagram.
- Soaita AM, Gibb K, Maclennan D (2019a). Housing wealth inequalities in scotland: an evidence review. A report for the scottish poverty and inequality commission.
- Soaita AM, Marsh A, Gibb K (2023). Policy movement in housing research: a critical interpretative synthesis. Housing Studies. doi:10.1080/02673037.2021.1879999
- Soaita AM, Munro M, McKee K (2020). Private renters' housing experiences in lightly regulated markets: a review of qualitative research.
- Soaita AM, Serin B, Preece J (2019b). A methodological quest for systematic literature mapping. International Journal of Housing Policy. doi:10.1080/19491247.2019.1649040
- Soaita AM, Simcock T, McKee K (2022). Housing challenges faced by low-income and other vulnerable privately renting households: an evidence review.
- Wang Y, Chau CK, Ng WY (2016). A review on the effects of physical built environment attributes on enhancing walking and cycling activity levels within residential neighborhoods. Cities. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2015.08.004
- Woodhall-Melnik JR, Dunn JR (2016). A systematic review of outcomes associated with participation in Housing First programs. Housing Studies. doi:10.1080/02673037.2015.1080816