Published January 31, 2022 | Version https://impactfactor.org/PDF/IJPCR/14/IJPCR,Vol14,Issue1,Article42.pdf
Journal article Open

Comparative Assessment of the Outcome in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis Treated Using of TENS Therapy and UltrasoundGuided Genicular Nerve Block

  • 1. Associate Professor, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna, Bihar, India

Description

Aim: Comparison of the Therapeutic Efficacy of TENS vs Ultrasound-guided Genicular Nerve Block in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis. Methods: Total 50 patients were included in this study, 25 each in the TENS group and GNB group, respectively. Primary OA knee, Radiologic K/L (Kellgren-Lawrence Grading Scale) score: 3 and 4, Age: 40–80 years, poorly responding to initial treatments, Patients unwilling or contraindicated for surgical management and Visual acuity scale (VAS) >5 were included in this study. All the subjects recruited in our study underwent some baseline routine blood investigation. The total study population (= 50) was divided into two groups (25 in each group) randomly. Before starting treatment, basic information like age, sex, and duration of disease were noted and baseline VAS and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) were calculated. A short course of acetaminophen tablet, lifestyle modification, and therapeutic exercise regimen was prescribed and followed. Results:  All numerical variables were found to be normally distributed by Kolmogorov–Smirnoff goodness-of-fit. The mean age of patients in TENS group (= 25) was around 54.26 (±7.68) years and in GNB group (= 25) was 55.63 (±6.97) years. a comparison of the numerical variable VAS for pain between both the groups by Student’s unpaired “t” test shows, after continuous 3 weeks of daily TENS therapy, knee pain improved from a mean VAS of 7.35 (±0.81) at baseline to 3.66 (±1.14) at the end of 1 month. Whereas, with a single sitting of GNB, the mean VAS improved from a baseline value of 7.41 (±0.86) to 2.87 (±0.92) at the end of 1 month. Thus, GNB shows a significantly better result (< 0.05) in improving knee pain than TENS therapy at 1 month. Although at the end of 3 months, the VAS in both the groups again becomes comparable (= 0.21). In the TENS group, WOMAC improved from a mean of 47.23 (±6.10) at baseline to 27.44 (±5.87) at the end of 1 month. In the GNB group (group II), the mean WOMAC improved from a baseline value of 46.69 (±5.85) to 24.44 (±4.81) at the end of 1 month. Thus, similar to pain, GNB shows significant better result (< 0.05) in improving knee stiffness and function than TENS therapy at 1 month. At the end of 3 months, the WOMAC in both the groups again becomes comparable (= 0.82.). Conclusion: We concluded that GNB is a better choice than TENS in the short-term and comparable in the long term and both add to the OA knee rehabilitation program significantly.

 

 

Abstract (English)

Aim: Comparison of the Therapeutic Efficacy of TENS vs Ultrasound-guided Genicular Nerve Block in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis. Methods: Total 50 patients were included in this study, 25 each in the TENS group and GNB group, respectively. Primary OA knee, Radiologic K/L (Kellgren-Lawrence Grading Scale) score: 3 and 4, Age: 40–80 years, poorly responding to initial treatments, Patients unwilling or contraindicated for surgical management and Visual acuity scale (VAS) >5 were included in this study. All the subjects recruited in our study underwent some baseline routine blood investigation. The total study population (= 50) was divided into two groups (25 in each group) randomly. Before starting treatment, basic information like age, sex, and duration of disease were noted and baseline VAS and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) were calculated. A short course of acetaminophen tablet, lifestyle modification, and therapeutic exercise regimen was prescribed and followed. Results:  All numerical variables were found to be normally distributed by Kolmogorov–Smirnoff goodness-of-fit. The mean age of patients in TENS group (= 25) was around 54.26 (±7.68) years and in GNB group (= 25) was 55.63 (±6.97) years. a comparison of the numerical variable VAS for pain between both the groups by Student’s unpaired “t” test shows, after continuous 3 weeks of daily TENS therapy, knee pain improved from a mean VAS of 7.35 (±0.81) at baseline to 3.66 (±1.14) at the end of 1 month. Whereas, with a single sitting of GNB, the mean VAS improved from a baseline value of 7.41 (±0.86) to 2.87 (±0.92) at the end of 1 month. Thus, GNB shows a significantly better result (< 0.05) in improving knee pain than TENS therapy at 1 month. Although at the end of 3 months, the VAS in both the groups again becomes comparable (= 0.21). In the TENS group, WOMAC improved from a mean of 47.23 (±6.10) at baseline to 27.44 (±5.87) at the end of 1 month. In the GNB group (group II), the mean WOMAC improved from a baseline value of 46.69 (±5.85) to 24.44 (±4.81) at the end of 1 month. Thus, similar to pain, GNB shows significant better result (< 0.05) in improving knee stiffness and function than TENS therapy at 1 month. At the end of 3 months, the WOMAC in both the groups again becomes comparable (= 0.82.). Conclusion: We concluded that GNB is a better choice than TENS in the short-term and comparable in the long term and both add to the OA knee rehabilitation program significantly.

 

 

Files

IJPCR,Vol14,Issue1,Article42.pdf

Files (129.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:63c8a7ab7d83af7489f6a7cbb0fb0d11
129.9 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Dates

Accepted
2021-12-28

References

  • 1. Li CF, Chen YJ, Lin TY, Hsiao YH, Fu JC, Chen CH, et al. Im- mediate responses of multi-focal low level laser therapy on quadriceps in knee osteoarthritis patients. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2019; 35: 702-7. 2. Dass RM, Kim E, Kim HK, Lee JY, Lee HJ, Rhee SJ. Alcohol neurolysis of genicular nerve for chronic knee pain. Korean J Pain 2019; 32: 223-7. 3. Kim DH, Lee MS, Lee S, Yoon SH, Shin JW, Choi SS. A pro- spective randomized comparison of the efficacy of ultra- sound- vs f luoroscopy-guided genicular nerve block for chronic knee osteoarthritis. Pain Physician 2019; 22: 139-46. 4. Crawford DC, Miller LE, Block JE. Conservatives manage- ment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a flawed strategy? Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2013; 5: e2. 5. Santaguida PL, Hawker GA, Hudak PL, Glazier R, Mahomed NN, Kreder HJ, et al. Patient characteristics affecting the prognosis of total hip and knee joint arthroplasty: a system- atic review. Can J Surg 2008; 51: 428-36.6. Kesikburun S, Yaşar E, Uran A, Adigüzel E, Yilmaz B. Ultra- soundguided genicular nerve pulsed radiofrequency treat- ment for painful knee osteoarthritis: a preliminary report. Pain Physician 2016; 19: E751- 9. 7. Choi WJ, Hwang SJ, Song JG, Leem JG, Kang YU, Park PH, et al. Radiofrequency treatment relieves chronic knee osteo- arthritis pain: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Pain 2011; 152: 481-7. 8. McCormick ZL, Korn M, Reddy R, Marcolina A, Dayanim D, Mattie R, et al. Cooled radiofrequency ablation of the genic- ular nerves for chronic pain due to knee osteoarthritis: six- month outcomes. Pain Med 2017; 18: 1631-41. 9. Protzman NM, Gyi J, Malhotra AD, Kooch JE. Examining the feasibility of radiofrequency treatment for chronic knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. PM R 2014; 6: 373-6. 10. Yasar E, Kesikburun S, Kılıç C, Güzelküçük Ü, Yazar F, Tan AK. Accuracy of ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block: a cadaveric study. Pain Physician 2015; 18: E899- 904. 11. Sutaria RG, Lee SW, Kim SY, Howe R, Downie SA. Localiza- tion of the lateral retinacular nerve for diagnostic and thera- peutic nerve block for lateral knee pain: a cadaveric study. PM R 2017; 9: 149-53. 12. Paker N, Tekdös D, Kesiktas N, et al. Comparison of the therapeutic efficacy of TENS versus intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a prospective randomized study. Adv Ther 2006;23(2):342–353. 13. Kesikburun S, Yaşar E, Uran A, et al. Ultrasound-guided genicular nerve pulsed radiofrequency treatment for painful knee osteoarthritis: a preliminary report. Pain Physic 2016;19(5):E751–E759.