Published September 16, 2024 | Version v1
Book chapter Open

Locus standi of Third States in World Court Proceedings Concerning erga omnes violations

Description

Recent years have brought an observable influx of proceedings in the International Court of Justice concerning violations of erga omnes norms in which third states (i.e. those not considered to be specially affected by particular violations) were engaged in both contentious and advisory cases. In addition, in those proceedings initiated by specially affected states, e.g. Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation), there have been an unprecedented number of interventions made by third states. These kinds of interventions have also been submitted in proceedings initiated by other, not directly/specially affected states – as in The Gambia v. Myanmar. These developments raise the following questions: On what basis can third  statesparticipate in proceedings concerning violations of erga omnes norms? Is their participation beneficial for the protection of erga omnes norms, and for the Court’s role?

Files

10_Grzebyk.pdf

Files (195.4 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:10d82b3d6ec8dcd8a2ab69d8202e666e
195.4 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is published in
Book chapter: 978-83-66300-98-9 (ISBN)

References

  • Amendments to Articles 81, 82 and 86 of Rules of Court which entered into force on 1 June 2024.
  • Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (The Gambia v. Myanmar), Judgment, 22 July 2022, ICJ Rep 2022.
  • Article 3 of 2005 IDI.
  • Articles 39, 42–43, 45–49, 52, 54 on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts (ARSIWA) adopted by the ILC in 2001.
  • Articles 39, 44–49, 51–53, 55, 57 on the Responsibility of international organisations adopted by the ILC in 2011.
  • C. Tams, Enforcing Obligations erga omnes in International Law, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 2005.
  • Cf. IIL, Resolution obligations erga omnes in international law, 27 August 2005, https://www.idi-iil.org/app/uploads/2017/06/2005_kra_01_en.pdf (accessed 22 March 2024).
  • Cf. K. Zemanek, New Trends in the Enforcement of Erga Omnes Obligations, 4 Max Planck United Nations Yearbook 2 (2000).
  • Cf. M. Ragazzi, The Concept of International Obligations erga omnes, Oxford University Press, Oxford: 1997, p. 17.
  • Cf. S. Villalpando, The Legal Dimension of the International Community: How Community Interests Are Protected in International Law, 21(2) European Journal of International Law 387 (2010).
  • CJ, Interpretation of Peace Treaties with Bulgaria, Hungary and Romania, Advisory Opinion, 30 March 1950, ICJ Rep 1950.
  • Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, 78(1021) UNTS 277 (1951).
  • Dissenting Opinion of Judge Xue, Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (The Gambia v. Myanmar), Judgment, ICJ Rep 2022.
  • Dissenting Opinion of Judge Xue, see and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (The Gambia v. Myanmar), Judgment, ICJ Rep 2022.
  • G. Gaja, Claims Concerning Obligations erga omnes in the Jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice, 55 Questions of International Law 131 (2018).
  • ICJ, Alleged Violations of Sovereign Rights and Maritime Spaces in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v. Colombia), Judgment, 17 March 2016, ICJ Rep 2016.
  • ICJ, Application for permission to intervene submitted by Nicaragua, Written pleading, 23 January 2024, ICJ Rep 2024.
  • ICJ, Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro), Judgment, 11 July 1996.
  • ICJ, Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (The Gambia v. Myanmar), Judgment, ICJ Rep 2022.
  • ICJ, Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (The Gambia v. Myanmar), Judgment, ICJ Rep 2022.
  • ICJ, Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro), ICJ Rep 2007.
  • ICJ, Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (The Gambia v. Myanmar), Judgment, ICJ Rep 2022.
  • ICJ, Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Qatar v. United Arab Emirates), Order, 23 July 2018, ICJ Rep 2018.
  • ICJ, Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Georgia v. Russian Federation), Judgment, 1 April 2011, ICJ Rep 2011.
  • ICJ, Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Rwanda), Judgment, ICJ Rep 2006.
  • ICJ, East Timor (Portugal v. Australia), Judgment, ICJ Rep 1995.
  • ICJ, Questions relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite (Belgium v. Senegal), Judgment, 20 July 2012, ICJ Rep 2012.
  • ICJ, Reservations to the Convention on Genocide, Advisory Opinion, 28 May 1951, ICJ Rep 1951.
  • ICJ, South West Africa cases (Ethiopia v. South Africa; Liberia v. South Africa), Judgment, 18 July 1966, ICJ Rep 1966.
  • ICJ, South West Africa cases (Ethiopia v. South Africa; Liberia v. South Africa), Judgment, ICJ Rep 1966.
  • ICJ, The Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (Belgium v. Spain), Judgment, 5 February 1970, ICJ Rep 1970.
  • ICJ, The Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (Belgium v. Spain), ICJ Rep 1970.
  • ICJ, The Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (Belgium v. Spain), Judgment, ICJ Rep 1970.
  • ICJ, Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan: New Zealand intervening), Judgment, 31 March 2014.
  • PCIJ, SS "Wimbledon" (UK v. Japan), Judgment, 17 August 1923, PCIJ Series A, No. 1.
  • PCIJ, The Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions (Greece v. Britain), Judgment, 30 August 1924, PCIJ Series A, No. 2.
  • R. Kolb, The Elgar Companion to the International Court of Justice, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham: 2014.
  • T. Ruys, Legal Standing and Public Interest Litigation – Are All Erga Omnes Breaches Equal?, 20(3) Chinese Journal of International Law 457 (2021).
  • Verbal statements made e.g. by Indonesia, Slovenia or Syria. Cf. with UK's position, 23 February 2024, CR2024/12.