Published September 13, 2024 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Supplementary material 2 from: Jones DN, Augustine BC, Hutchins P, Birch JM, Yamahara KM, Jensen S, Richardson R, Trott R, Campbell JR, Barnhart E, Sepulveda AJ (2024) Autonomous samplers and environmental DNA metabarcoding: sampling day and primer choice have greatest impact on fish detection probabilities. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 8: e122375. https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.8.122375

  • 1. U.S. Geological Survey, Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center, Bozeman, United States of America
  • 2. Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, Moss Landing, United States of America
  • 3. Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc., Indianapolis, United States of America|University of Maryland, Frostburg, United States of America
  • 4. University of Maryland, Frostburg, United States of America
  • 5. U.S. Geological Survey Wyoming-Montana Water Science Center, Riverton, United States of America
  • 6. U.S. Geological Survey Wyoming-Montana Water Science Center, Helena, United States of America

Description

Sequence data for mock communities used in metabarcoding

Files

Files (10.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:e5ba4f67bf31667c8a9dc5d60ba0ea1e
10.1 kB Download

Additional details

Related works

Is part of
Journal article: https://zenodo.org/record/13764335 (URL)
Is supplement to
Journal article: 10.3897/mbmg.8.122375 (DOI)