Published March 21, 2024 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Stobaea rubricaulis DC.

  • 1. Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, SE- 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
  • 2. Department of Plant Sciences and Afromontane Research Unit, University of the Free State, Private Bag X 13, Phuthaditjhaba 9866, South Africa

Description

Stobaea rubricaulis DC.

The name Stobaea rubricaulis was published by Candolle (1838: 515) based on a specimen collected from Swellendam formerly in the personal herbarium of C.F. Ecklon. A specimen in Candolle’s ‘Prodromus’ herbarium (G-DC barcode G00499160) carries a label attributing it to Ecklon and bears the collection number “N. 308”, the collection locality “Swellendam et Georg”, and the Ecklon and Zeyher locality number “91”. Under ICN Art. 7.11, this specimen was effectively designated the lectotype for S. rubricaulis by Roessler (1959). The locality number “91” was used for material collected by J.L.L. Mund, who worked as a land surveyor in George and subsequently in Swellendam in the Western Cape in the late 1820s (Glen & Germishuizen 2010). On Mund’s death in 1831, his personal herbarium passed to Ecklon, who subsequently distributed the specimens.

According to Roessler (1959), S. rubricaulis differs from B. rigida only in the somewhat coarser leaf dissection of the former. Certainly, the upper cauline leaves and involucral bracts of the central specimen on UPS-THUNB 18601 and the specimen G00499160 are morphologically consistent, with the bracts and leaves of the Thunberg specimen somewhat more densely tomentose. There is no indication that the capitula of G00499160 contained ray florets. The leaves of B. rigida vary considerably in overall dimensions, degree of dissection, and the dimensions of the apical and lateral lobes and spines. The lower cauline leaves of G00499160 are consistent with those of the most widespread form of B. rigida (Fig. 1C).

As cited by Roessler (1959), a specimen of B. rigida collected from Swellendam by Mund is housed in Herb. SAM (ex Herbarium Musei Austro-Africani no. 40107). In all accessible morphological characters, the SAM specimen is consistent with the G00499160 specimen and with B. rigida, although the SAM specimen is in better condition and is more complete than G00499160.

In agreement with Roessler (1959), we have found no evidence that S. rubricaulis is morphologically distinguishable from B. rigida and therefore retain the former name in the synonymy of B. rigida.

Notes

Published as part of Karis, Per Ola & Mckenzie, Robert J., 2024, Second-step lectotypification of Stobaea rigida and reassessment of heterotypic synonyms of Berkheya rigida (Asteraceae, Arctotideae), pp. 267-276 in Phytotaxa 641 (4) on pages 272-273, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.641.4.3, http://zenodo.org/record/13214070

Files

Files (2.6 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:56cbf8d2ee045750db9a32aabb468045
2.6 kB Download

System files (13.2 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:31172cbc9413d2f86f58adbf879e87ad
13.2 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Scientific name authorship
DC.
Kingdom
Plantae
Phylum
Tracheophyta
Order
Asterales
Family
Asteraceae
Genus
Stobaea
Species
rubricaulis
Taxon rank
species

References

  • Candolle, A. P. de. (1838 [dated 1837]) Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis, sive enumeratio contracta ordinum, generum, specierumque plantarum hucusque cognitarum, juxta methodi naturalis normas digesta 6. Treuttel & Wurtz, Paris, 687 pp. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 286
  • Roessler, H. (1959) Revision der Arctotideae - Gorteriinae (Compositae). Mitteilungen der Botanische Staatssammlung Munchen 3: 71 - 500.
  • Glen, H. F. & Germishuizen, G. (compilers) (2010) Botanical exploration of southern Africa, 2 nd ed. Strelitzia 26. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, 489 pp.