Published December 31, 2021
| Version v1
Figure
Open
Fig. 2. A in Host and geographic differences in prevalence and diversity of gastrointestinal helminths of foxes (Vulpes vulpes), coyotes (Canis latrans) and wolves (Canis lupus) in Quebec´, Canada
Creators
- 1. University of Saskatchewan, Department of Veterinary Microbiology, 52 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5B4, Canada & Research Group on Epidemiology of Zoonoses and Public Health (GREZOSP), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universit´e de Montr´eal, 3200 Rue Sicotte, Saint-
- 2. University of Global Health Equity, Center for One Health, Kigali, Rwanda
- 3. University of Saskatchewan, Department of Veterinary Microbiology, 52 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5B4, Canada
- 4. Minist`ere des Forˆets, de La Faune et des Parcs, 880 Chemin Sainte-Foy, Qu´ebec, QC, G1S 4X4, Canada & Research Group on Epidemiology of Zoonoses and Public Health (GREZOSP), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universit´e de Montr´eal, 3200 Rue Sicotte, Saint-
- 5. University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez, Department of Biology, Box 9000, Mayagüez 00681, 9000, Puerto Rico
- 6. Research Group on Epidemiology of Zoonoses and Public Health (GREZOSP), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universit´e de Montr´eal, 3200 Rue Sicotte, Saint-
Description
Fig. 2. A) Parasite genus richness in foxes (Vulpes vulpes, blue), coyotes (Canis latrans, orange), and wolves (Canis lupus, gray) from Qu´ebec, Canada, determined by gross examination and fecal flotation combined (N = 250). Fewer foxes were uninfected than coyotes (p = 0.006). More foxes were infected by two parasite genera than coyotes (p = 0.004). B) Parasite genus richness between Subarctic (yellow) and Humid Continental climate (green) in foxes from Qu´ebec, Canada, determined by gross examination and fecal flotation combined (N = 155). No significant difference in parasite genera was seen in foxes between Subarctic and Humid Continental climate regions. Parasites counted in both histograms were: diphyllobothriids (likely Dibothriocephalus spp.), Echinococcus spp., Taenia spp., Capillaria spp., Toxascaris sp., Toxocara sp., Trichuris sp., Uncinaria sp., Alaria sp., Cryptocotyle sp., and Metorchis sp. Parasites observed in both fecal and gross examination were only counted once. Bars represent 95% confidence intervals. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Notes
Files
figure.png
Files
(219.5 kB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:09e5e505bd317f209fe23396ea99dd21
|
219.5 kB | Preview Download |
Linked records
Oops! Something went wrong while fetching results.
Additional details
Related works
- Is part of
- Journal article: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2021.09.002 (DOI)
- Journal article: urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:772A446DFFEC9B5D922CFFCEB476FFF1 (LSID)
- Journal article: https://zenodo.org/record/13267631 (URL)