Published July 30, 2018 | Version v1
Other Open

OPERAS Common Standards White Paper

  • 1. National Documentation Centre (EKT/NHRF)
  • 2. OAPEN
  • 3. University of Milan
  • 4. OpenEdition


The OPERAS Working Group for Common Standards aims at exploring the workflows, mediums and
technical standards that have recently emerged as a result of the changes brought about by the
transition to Open Science. It places focus on the importance of common standards, and traces the
improvements required to ensure content quality and interconnectivity for scholarly output in the SSH
and beyond.

The White Paper on Common Standards comprises desk research and identifies key operational
and technical aspects to be addressed by digital research infrastructures and service providers. It
particularly sketches the landscape of Open Science in Europe, focusing on the policy framework and
the institutional initiatives at EU level; it also describes current and emerging research practices and
highlights the needs of the stakeholders and communities engaged in scholarly communication.

Reference is specifically made to technical and operational standards for publishing infrastructures,
and their importance in providing a digital scholarly communication framework that fosters content
reuse and collaboration among researchers, while enabling the implementation of innovative research
methods. To this end, the white paper identifies needs yet to be met, introduces 4 complementary
areas (content quality and impact assessment, interoperability, availability and processability)
for the introduction of common standards, and provides basic recommendations for their future

The white paper also examines where OPERAS members stand and suggests a roadmap for the
community-wide adoption of standards.. As effective implementation of common standards is highly
depended upon stakeholders’ increased awareness and commitment towards more effective ways of
conducting, presenting and communicating research, the white paper underlines the instrumental role
of the OPERAS network in specifying new standards and updating existing ones.



Files (534.2 kB)

Name Size Download all
534.2 kB Preview Download

Additional details


OPERAS-D – Design for Open access Publications in European Research Areas for Social Sciences and Humanities 731031
European Commission


  • Alexiou, G., Vahdati, S., Lange, C., Papastefanatos, G., & Lohmann, S. (2016). "OpenAIRE LOD services: scholarly communication data as linked data". In International Workshop on Semantic, Analytics, Visualization (pp. 45-50). Springer, Cham. chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-53637-8_6
  • Almeida, F., Oliveira J., Cruz J. (2011). "Open Standards And Open Source: Enabling Interoperability". International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications (IJSEA) 2(1). ijsea/papers/0111ijsea01.pdf
  • Ball, C. E., Eyman, D. (2015). "Editorial Workflows for Multimedia-Rich Scholarship". Journal of Electronic Publishing 18(4). DOI:
  • Browning, S., Guedon, J., Kaplan, L. (2013). " Metadata and Open Access: Reliably Finding Content and Finding Reliable Content". Proceedings of the Charleston Library Conference. http://dx.doi. org/10.5703/1288284315314
  • COPE, DOAJ, OASPA, WAME. "Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing". publishing (accessed 29/6/2018)
  • Day, M,. (2005). "Metadata". In S.Ross, M.Day (eds) DCC Digital Curation Manual. http://www.dcc. (accessed 29/6/2018)
  • European Commission, Directorate General for Research and Innovation. (2016). "Open innovation, Open Science, Open to the World". publication/3213b335-1cbc-11e6-ba9a-01aa75ed71a1 (accessed 16/4/2018)
  • Ferwerda, E., de Vries, S., Dumouchel, S., Gatti, R., Mounier, P., Radovic, D., Smaniotto, A., Stojanovski, J., & Waaijers, L. (2018). OPERAS Platforms and Services White Paper. Zenodo. deposit/1324058
  • Harley, D., Acord S., Earl-Novell, S., Lawrence, S., King, J. (2010) "Assessing the Future Landscape of Scholarly Communication: An Exploration of Faculty Values and Needs in Seven Disciplines". Berkeley: The Center for Studies in Higher Education. (accessed 29/6/2018).
  • Hutchens, C. (2013). "Open access metadata: current practices and proposed solutions". Learned Publishing, 26 (3) pp: 159-165. DOI:
  • Hyde, A. (2015). "Open Access and Standards". Journal of Electronic Publishing 18(1). DOI: http://
  • Neylon, C., Pentz, E., Tananbaum, G. (2014). "Standardized Metadata Elements to Identify Access and License Information". Information Standards Quarterly,(2) pp: 35-37. handle/20.500.11937/24522 (accessed 29/6/2018).
  • OPERAS Consortium (2017a). "Landscape Study on Open Access Publishing". DOI: https://doi. org/10.5281/zenodo.1299151
  • OPERAS Consortium (2017b). "Technical Mapping of OPERAS Consortium". DOI: https://doi. org/10.5281/zenodo.1247926
  • OPERAS Consortium. (2018). "Report on online survey on optimizing e-infrastructure". optimizing_e-infrastructure.pdf (accessed 30/6/2018).
  • Speicher, L., Armando, L., Bargheer, M., Eve, M., Fund, S., Leão, D., Mosterd, M., Pinter, F., & Souyioultzoglou, I. (2018). OPERAS Open Access Business Models White Paper. Zenodo. https://
  • Stathopoulos, P., Houssos, N.. (2013). "Specifications and interoperability features for open digital content" (trans. Georgiadis, H.).
  • Tsoukala, V. (2015). "University based Open Access Publishing. State of Play". SPARC Europe. http:// (accessed 29/6/2018).
  • Warren, J. (2015). "Zen and the Art of Metadata Maintenance". Journal of Electronic Publishing 18(3).
  • Yu, L. (2011). "Linked Open Data". A Developer's Guide to the Semantic Web. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg