Published July 29, 2018 | Version v1
Poster Open

Exploring flaring activity as an age indicator using open cluster data

  • 1. Leibniz Institute for Astrophysics Potsdam
  • 2. Western Washington University

Contributors

Editor:

  • 1. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge
  • 2. Leibniz Institute for Astrophysics Potsdam

Description

The presence and strength of stellar magnetic activity is rooted in a star's fundamental parameters such as mass and age. Age-resolved investigations of chromospheric activity indicators, and large scale magnetic field observations suggest that one can access an individual star's age via its magnetic activity. Can flares, magnetically driven energetic outbursts of energy on the surfaces of stars, serve as an accurate stellar clock" then? For a star with given mass, the probability to encounter a flare scales as a power law with its total released energy. If there is an activity-age relation in the form of a flaring-age relation we expect the observed flaring rates and energies to vary significantly in these objects. Thus, the slope and intercept of the power law fit to the flare frequency distribution would be a function of both mass and age. The Kepler mission provides the means to test this hypothesis - high precision time domain photometry of thousands of stars in more than 10 open clusters spanning a wide range of ages. Using Kepler's K2 Campaigns 4 and 5 we explore the possibility to calibrate such a clock on the example of three open clusters: M67 (4.3 Gyr), M44 (0.63 Gyr) and the Pleiades (0.125 Gyr), and present first results.

Notes

Poster number 143

Files

Poster19072018.pdf

Files (1.1 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:9d72c2b4e66ea9e9b3cb911dfb6b33f8
1.1 MB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Aigrain et al. (2016), MNRAS 459, 2408-2419
  • Davenport (2016), ApJ 829, 23
  • Howell et al. (2014), PASP 126, 398-408
  • Skumanich (1972), ApJ 171, 565
  • Bell et al. (2012), MNRAS 424, 3178-91
  • Boudreault et al. (2012), MNRAS 426, 3419-34
  • Dias et al. (2012), A&A 539, A125
  • Netopil et al. (2016), A&A 585, A150
  • Rebull et al. (2016), AJ 152, 113
  • Kraus & Hillenbrand (2007), AJ 134, 2340-52
  • Douglas et al. (2017), ApJ 842, 83
  • Gonzalez (2016), MNRAS 459, 1060-68