Published July 31, 2015 | Version v1
Journal article Restricted

Ecomorphology of Carnivora challenges convergent evolution

Description

Meloro, Carlo, Clauss, Marcus, Raia, Pasquale (2015): Ecomorphology of Carnivora challenges convergent evolution. Organisms Diversity & Evolution (New York, N.Y.) 15 (4): 711-720, DOI: 10.1007/s13127-015-0227-5, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13127-015-0227-5

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted to users with access.

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:0868FFD04B732032FF83FFF1FB1CFFB1

References

  • Adams, D. C. (2014a). A generalized K statistic for estimating phylogenetic signal from shape and other high-dimensional multivariate data. Systematic Biology, 63, 685-697.
  • Adams, D. C. (2014b). Quantifying and comparing phylogenetic evolutionary rates for shape and other high-dimensional phenotypic data. Systematic Biology, 63, 166-177.
  • Adams, D. C., & Collyer, M. L. (2015). Permutation tests for phylogenetic comparative analyses of high-dimensional shape data: what you shuffle matters. Evolution, 69, 823-829.
  • Adams, D. C., & Otarola-Castillo, E. (2013). Geomorph: an R package for the collection and analysis of geometric morphometric shape data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4, 393-399.
  • Adams, D. C., Cardini, A., Monteiro, L. R., O'Higgins, P., & Rohlf, F. J. (2011). Morphometrics and phylogenetics: principal components of shape from cranial modules are neither appropriate nor effective cladistic characters. Journal of Human Evolution, 60, 240-243.
  • Adams, D. C., Rohlf, D. C., & Slice, D. E. (2013). A field comes of age: geometric morphometrics in the 21st century. Hystrix, the Italian Journal of Mammalogy, 24, 7-14.
  • Allen, M. E., Oftedal, O. T., & Baer, D. J. (1996). The feeding and nutrition of carnivores. In D. G. Kleiman, M. E. Allen, K. V. Thompson, & S. Lumpkin (Eds.), Wild mammals in captivity. Principles and Techniques (pp. 139-147). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Arnold, C., Matthews, L. J., & Nunn, C. L. (2010). The 10k trees Website: a new online resource for primate phylogeny. Evolutionary Anthropology, 19, 114-118.
  • Bennett, C. V., & Goswami, A. (2013). Statistical support for the hypothesis of developmental constraint in marsupial skull evolution. BMC Biology, 11(1), 52.
  • Biknevicius, A. R., & Van Valkenburgh, B. (1996). Design for killing: craniodental adaptations of mammalian predators. In J. L. Gittleman (Ed.), Carnivore behavior, ecology, and evolution, Vol. 2 (pp. 393- 428). Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
  • Blomberg, S. P., Garland, T., Jr., & Ives, A. R. (2003). Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution, 57, 717-745.
  • Bookstein, F.L. (1989). Size and shape: a comment on semantics. Systematic Zoology, 38, 173-180.
  • Carbone, C., Georgina, M. M., Roberts, S. C., & Macdonald, D. W. (1999). Energetic constraints on the diet of terrestrial carnivores. Nature, 402, 286-288.
  • Carbone, C., Teacher, A., & Rowcliffe, J. M. (2007). The cost of carnivory. PLoS Biology, 5, e22.
  • Clauss, M., Kleffner, H., & Kienzle, E. (2010). Carnivorous mammals: nutrient digestibility and energy evaluation. Zoo Biology, 29, 687- 704.
  • Creel, S., & Creel, N.M. (2002). The African wild dog: behavior, ecology, and conservation. Princeton University Press.
  • Davies, J. T., Meiri, S., Barraclough, T. G., & Gittleman, J. L. (2007). Species co- existence and character divergence across carnivores. Ecology Letters, 10, 146-152.
  • Echarri, S., & Prevosti, F. J. (2015). Differences in mandibular disparity between extant and extinct species of metatherian and placental carnivore clades. Lethaia, 48, 196-204.
  • Ewer, R. F. (1973). The carnivores. New York: Cornell University Press.
  • Figueirido, B., Serrano-Alarcon, F. J., Slater, G. J., & Palmqvist, P. (2010). Shape at the cross-roads: homoplasy and history in the evolution of the carnivoran skull towards herbivory. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 23, 2579-2594.
  • Figueirido, B., MacLeod, N., Krieger, J., De Renzi, M., Perez- Claros, J. A., & Palmqvist, P. (2011). Constraint and adaptation in the evolution of carnivoran skull shape. Paleobiology, 37, 490-518.
  • Figueirido, B., Tseng, Z. J., & Martin-Serra, A. (2013). Skull shape evolution in durophagous carnivorans. Evolution, 67, 1975-1993.
  • Friscia, A. R., Van Valkenburgh, B., & Biknevicius, A. R. (2007). An ecomorphological analysis of extant small carnivorans. Journal of Zoology (London), 272, 82-100.
  • Futuyma, D. J. (2010). Evolutionary constraint and ecological consequences. Evolution, 64, 1865-1884.
  • Goodall, C. (1991). Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 285-339.
  • Goswami, A. (2006). Morphological integration in the carnivoran skull. Evolution, 60, 122-136.
  • Goswami, A. (2010). Introduction to carnivoran evolution. In A. Goswami & A. Friscia (Eds.), Carnivoran evolution: new views on phylogeny, form, and function (pp. 1-24). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Harmon, L. J., Schulte, J. A., Losos, J. B., & Larson, A. (2003). Tempo and mode of evolutionary radiation in iguanian lizards.Science, 301, 961-964.
  • Holliday, J. A., & Steppan, S. J. (2004). Evolution of hypercarnivory: the effect of specialization on morphological and taxonomic diversity. Paleobiology, 30, 108-128.
  • Johnson, K. G., Schaller, G. B., & Jinchu, H. (1988). Comparative behavior of red and giant pandas in the Wolong Reserve, China. Journal of Mammalogy, 69, 552-564.
  • Kruuk, H. (1972). The spotted hyena (a study of predation and social behaviour). Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Lofroth, E. C., Krebs, J. A., Harrower, W. L., & Lewis, D. (2007). Food habits of wolverine Gulo gulo in montane ecosystems of British Columbia, Canada. Wildlife Biology, 13, 31-37.
  • Mech, D. (1980). The wolf. The ecology and behaviour of an endangered species. Minneapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Meiri, S., Guy, D., Dayan, T., & Simberloff, D. (2009). Global change and carnivore body size: data are stasis. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 18, 240-247.
  • Meloro, C. (2011a). Feeding habits of Plio-Pleistocene large carnivores as revealed by their mandibular geometry. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 31, 428-446.
  • Meloro, C. (2011b). Morphological disparity in Plio-Pleistocene large carnivore guilds from Italian peninsula. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 56, 33-44.
  • Meloro, C. (2012).Mandibular shape correlates of tooth fracture in extant Carnivora: implications to inferring feeding behaviour of Pleistocene predators. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 106, 70-80.
  • Meloro, C., & O' Higgins, P. (2011). Ecological adaptations of mandibular form in fissiped Carnivora. Journal of Mammalian Evolution, 18, 185-200.
  • Meloro, C., & Raia, P. (2010). Cats and dogs down the tree: the tempo and mode of evolution in the lower carnassial of fossil and living Carnivora. Evolutionary Biology, 37, 177- 186.
  • Meloro, C., Raia, P., Piras, P., Barbera, C., & O' Higgins, P. (2008). The shape of the mandibular corpus in large fissiped carnivores: allometry, function and phylogeny. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 154, 832-845.
  • Meloro, C., Raia, P., Carotenuto, F., & Cobb, S. (2011). Phylogenetic signal, function and integration in the subunits of the carnivoran mandible. Evolutionary Biology, 38, 465-475.
  • Meloro, C., Caceres, N.C., Carotenuto, F., Sponchiado, J., Melo, G.L., Passaro, F., & Raia P. (2015). Chewing on the trees: constraints and adaptation in the evolution of the 1 primate mandible. Evolution (in press).
  • O'Higgins, P., & Jones, N. (1998). Facial growth in Cercocebus torquatus: an application of three dimensional geometric morphometric techniques to the study of morphological variation. Journal of Anatomy, 193, 251-272.
  • Prevosti, F. J., Turazzini, G. F., Ercoli, M. D., & Hingst-Zaher, E. (2012). Mandible shape in marsupial and placental carnivorous mammals: a morphological comparative study using geometric morphometrics. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 164, 836-855.
  • Raia, P. (2004). Morphological correlates of tough food consumption in carnivores. Italian Journal of Zoology, 71, 45-50.
  • Raia, P., Carotenuto, F., Meloro, C., Piras, P., & Pushkina, D. (2010). The shape of contention: adaptation, history, and contingency in ungulate mandibles. Evolution, 64, 1489-1503.
  • Rohlf, F. J., & Slice, D. E. (1990). Extensions of the procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Systematic Zoology, 39, 40-59.
  • Schaller, G. B. (1972). The Serengeti lion (a study of predator-prey relations). Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Slater, G. J., Figueirido, B., Louis, L., Yang, P., & Van Valkenburgh, B. (2010). Biomechanical consequences of rapid evolution in the polar bear lineage. PloS One, 5(11), e13870.
  • Stayton, C. T. (2006). Testing hypotheses of convergence with multivariate data: morphological and functional convergence among herbivorous lizards. Evolution, 60, 824-841.
  • Van Valkenburgh, B. (1985). Locomotor diversity between past and present guilds of large predatory mammals. Paleobiology, 11, 406-428.
  • Van Valkenburgh, B. (1988). Trophic diversity in past and present guilds of large predatory mammals. Paleobiology, 14, 155-173.
  • Van Valkenburgh, B. (1989). Carnivore dental adaptations and diet: a study of trophic diversity within guilds. In J. L. Gittleman (Ed.), Carnivore behavior, ecology, and evolution, volume 1 (pp. 410- 436). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Van Valkenburgh, B. (1991). Iterative evolution of hypercarnivory in canids (Mammalia: Carnivora): evolutionary interactions among sympatric predators. Paleobiology, 17, 340-362.
  • Van Valkenburgh, B. (1996). Feeding behaviour in free-ranging, large African carnivores. Journal of Mammalogy, 77, 240-254.
  • Van Valkenburgh, B. (1999). Major patterns in the history of carnivorous mammals. Annual Review Earth Planetary Science, 27, 463-493.
  • Van Valkenburgh, B. (2007). Deja vu: the evolution of feeding morphologies in the Carnivora. Integrative Comparative Biology, 47, 147- 163.
  • Wei, F., Feng, Z., Wang, Z., Zhou, A., & Hu, J. (1999). Use of the nutrients in bamboo by the red panda (Ailurus fulgens). Journal of Zoology (London), 248, 535-541.
  • Werdelin, L. (1989). Constraint and adaptation in the bone-cracking canid Osteoborus (Mammalia: Canidae). Paleobiology, 15, 387-401.