Published 2024 | Version v2
Dataset Open

Last Chance Ecosystems

  • 1. ROR icon The Nature Conservancy
  • 1. ROR icon The Nature Conservancy
  • 2. ROR icon U.S. Geological Survey, Wetland and Aquatic Research Center

Description

The IUCN Convention on Biological Diversity Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework established a goal to protect at least 30% of earth's ecosystems by 2030. A key component of this target is the need to conserve representative examples of all ecosystem types. Identification of ecosystem type and locality is an essential first step. We stratified World Terrestrial Ecosystems by zoogeographic regions to identify a total of 2,394 distinct terrestrial ecosystems. We classified these ecosystems by level of protection and conversion. Those identified as vulnerable, endangered, and critically endangered were deemed “crisis ecosystems;” they comprise a quarter of  the 2,394 ecosystems. These crisis ecosystems may contain some relatively intact, functioning areas that could serve as the basis to maintain function and perhaps restore more extensive areas.  The portion of crisis ecosystems that show low Human Modification are in what we deem “Last Chance Ecosystem” status. Globally, 2.6% of the terrestrial world (2.888 million km2) is in this stage and protection may help meet global representation targets and prevent ecosystem collapse.

Files

Crisis_Ecosystems_1km_3classonly.zip

Files (135.2 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:99a86809e5bcd1f85fd4946f230e179a
19.8 MB Preview Download
md5:ce20e7f035ca6f66f5b93a321f1908b2
115.4 MB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Sayre, R., et al. (2020). An assessment of the representation of ecosystems in global protected areas using new maps of World Climate Regions and World Ecosystems. Global Ecology and Conservation, 21: e00860.
  • Ficetola, G. F., et al. (2017). Global determinants of zoogeographical boundaries. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 1(4): 1-7.
  • Kennedy, C. M., et al. (2019). Managing the middle: A shift in conservation priorities based on the global human modification gradient. Global change biology 25.3: 811-826.
  • Hengl, T., et al. (2018). Global mapping of potential natural vegetation: an assessment of machine learning algorithms for estimating land potential. PeerJ, 6: e5457.
  • Hoekstra, J. M., et al. (2005). Confronting a biome crisis: global disparities of habitat loss and protection. Ecology letters, 8(1): 23-29.