Neutronic evaluation of VVER fuel assembly with chemical spectral shift regulation
- 1. Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
- 2. National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, Russia
- 3. Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia
Description
The performance of the spectral shift control (SSC) method is evaluated and compared to the conventional poison method in the VVER-1000 fuel assembly design. The SSC method can be implemented by gradually adjusting the ratio of heavy water to light water moderator (D2O/H2O) during the fuel cycle. In this study, the efficiency of using the SSC design with or without a thermal absorber (gadolinium) is investigated. We apply the SSC with both 12 burnable absorber rods containing 4.0 wt.% Gd2O3 (Case 1) and without Gd2O3 (Case 2). The neutronic calculations indicate that the discharge burnup is enhanced by 60% and the conversion ratio (CR) is increased by 64.4% at the beginning of the cycle (BOC) compared to the benchmark data. The breeding of Pu239 and Pu241 is extended to 33.7% and 29.5%, respectively, for the SSC design case (2), and better utilization of U-235 and U-238 has been achieved compared to BM.
Files
NUCET_article_125815.pdf
Files
(2.0 MB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:0b91664e456c88bb04ed34e6efafe5d8
|
1.9 MB | Preview Download |
md5:7555845d444981d20e50bc2a5d642311
|
75.7 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- Alcala F (1984) Optimization of the fuel cell of a spectral shift controlled reactor. Nuclear Science and Engineering 87(4): 460–469. https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE84-A18512
- Betzler BR, Robertson S, Davidson née Sunny EE, Powers JJ, Worrall A, Dewan L, Massie M (2018) Fuel cycle and neutronic performance of a spectral shift molten salt reactor design. Annals of Nuclear Energy 119: 396–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2018.04.043
- Burns JR, Hernandez R, Terrani KA, Nelson AT, Brown NR (2020) Reactor and fuel cycle performance of light water reactor fuel with 235U enrichments above 5%. Annals of Nuclear Energy 142: 107423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2020.107423
- Chadwick MB, Obložinský P, Herman M, Greene NM, McKnight RD, Smith DL, Young PG, MacFarlane RE, Hale GM, Frankle SC et al. (2006) ENDF/B-VII. 0: next generation evaluated nuclear data library for nuclear science and technology. Nuclear Data Sheets 107(12): 2931–3060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2006.11.001
- Choi Y-J, Yoon S, Parisi C (2023) Assessment of Modeling and Simulation Technical Gaps in Safety Analysis of High Burnup Accident-Tolerant Fuels. Idaho National Laboratory (INL), Idaho Falls ID (United States). https://doi.org/10.2172/2004911
- Elzayat T, Chertkov YB, Ashraf O (2022) Chemical spectral shift control method for VVER-1000 LEU fuel assembly benchmark. Annals of Nuclear Energy 165: 108677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2021.108677
- Kalugin M, Gehin J (2002) A VVER-1000 LEU and MOX Assembly Computational Benchmark NEA/NSC/DOC10.
- Kotlyar D, Lindley BA, Mohamed H (2017) Improving fuel utilization in SmAHTR with spectral shift control design: Proof of concept. Annals of Nuclear Energy 104: 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2016.12.037
- Leppänen J, Pusa M, Viitanen T, Valtavirta V, Kaltiaisenaho T (2015) The Serpent Monte Carlo code: Status, development and applications in 2013. Annals of Nuclear Energy 82: 142–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.08.024
- Lindley BA, Parks GT (2016) The Spectral Shift Control Reactor as an option for much improved uranium utilisation in single-batch SMRs. Nuclear Engineering and Design 309: 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.08.041
- Lindsay IO, Fox M, Sweet RT, Capps N, Brown NR (2023) Fuel performance evaluation of two high burnup PWR core designs during normal operation, control rod withdrawal, and control rod ejection scenarios. Nuclear Engineering and Design 415: 112730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2023.112730
- Mars D, Gans D (1961) Spectral shift control reactor design and economic study (Vol. 1241). Office of Technical Services.
- Matzie RA, Sider FM (1979) Evaluation of spectral shift controlled reactors operating on the uranium fuel cycle. Final report. No. EPRI-NP-1156. Combustion Engineering Inc., Windsor CT (United States). https://doi.org/10.2172/5622590
- Nagy ME, Aly MN, Gaber FA, Dorrah ME (2014) Neutron absorption profile in a reactor moderated by different mixtures of light and heavy waters. Annals of Nuclear Energy 72: 487–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.06.005
- Okumura K, Ishiguro Y, Kaneko K (1988) Core Burnup Calculation Method for Spectral Shift Reactor Using Fertile Rod. In Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology 25(12): 948–951. https://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.1988.9735953
- Sider FM, Matzie RA (1980) Plutonium fuel cycles in the spectral shift controlled reactor. Nuclear Technology 47(3): 444–450. https://doi.org/10.13182/NT80-A32398
- Tochihara H, Komano Y, Ishida M, Narukawa K, Umeno M (1998) Nuclear design for mixed moderator PWR. Progress in Nuclear Energy 32(3–4): 533–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-1970(97)00040-1
- Tsvetkov PV, Ames DE, Alajo AB, Lewis TG (2008) Spectrum shifting as a mechanism to improve performance of VHTRs with advanced actinide fuels. Nuclear Engineering and Design 238(8): 1958–1964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2007.11.013
- Yokornizo O, Kashiwai S, Nishida K, Orii A, Mochida T (1993) Spectral shift rod for the Boiling Water Reactor. In Nuclear Engineering and Design 144(2): 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(93)90139-Z
- Zhao C, Lou L, Peng X, Zhang B, Wang L (2021) Application of the Spectral-Shift Effect in the Small Lead-Based Reactor SLBR-50. Frontiers in Energy Research 9: 756106. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.756106