Published June 28, 2018 | Version v3
Dataset Open

Data for: A systematic review and meta-analysis of Drosophila short-term-memory genetics: robust reproducibility, but little independent replication

  • 1. 1. Institute for Molecular and Cell Biology, A*STAR, Singapore 2. Department of Physiology, National University of Singapore, Singapore
  • 2. 3. Program in Neuroscience and Behavioral Disorders, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
  • 3. 1. Institute for Molecular and Cell Biology, A*STAR, Singapore 2. Department of Physiology, National University of Singapore, Singapore 3. Program in Neuroscience and Behavioral Disorders, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore

Description

All the data, code, analyses, and figures used in the study entitled: "A systematic review and meta-analysis of Drosophila short-term-memory genetics: robust reproducibility, but little independent replication" (doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/247650)

Abstract

Geneticists have long used olfactory conditioning techniques in Drosophila to identify the neurons and genes that mediate learning. While this method has characterized an abundance of memory-related genes, little is known about how these genes induce short-term memory (STM) via signaling pathways; characterizing these networks will be essential to developing mechanistic models of memory formation. Here, we investigated why elucidating the STM pathways has been relatively slow. One possibility is that the STM evidence base is weak due to publication of poorly reproducible results, as has been observed in other fields. We examined this hypothesis by performing a systematic review and subsequent meta-analysis of the STM genetics field. Using several metrics to quantify the variation between discovery articles and follow-up studies, we found that seven genes were highly replicated, showed no publication bias, and had generally high reproducibility. However, the remaining ~80% memory genes have not been replicated since their initial discovery. Although we observed only a few studies that investigated gene interactions, the reviewed genes could together account for >1000% memory. This large summed effect size indicates either that some of the gene findings are not reproducible, that many memory genes participate in shared pathways, or that current protocols lack the specificity needed to identify core plasticity memory genes. Mechanistic theories of memory and cognition will require the convergence of evidence from system, circuit, cellular, molecular, and genetic experiments. As this study demonstrates, systematic data synthesis is an essential tool for this integrated brain science.

Files

DatabaseSearch_SystematicReview.zip

Files (31.5 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:d2130e74e9eb9d28dcbbe6e661165115
956.2 kB Preview Download
md5:d0d0650de609a33dd2cc903d731cc1fe
16.0 MB Preview Download
md5:040a05c2dfec80da792d225246c205b9
11.0 MB Preview Download
md5:6fbe1864d62f09d76dd56fa55cb59a98
125.7 kB Preview Download
md5:1347be139b4d2e01e29dadcdbf0dd2ca
3.3 MB Preview Download