Published August 31, 2016 | Version v1
Figure Open

Fig. 6 in Comparison of sampling methodologies and estimation of population parameters for a temporary fish ectoparasite

  • 1. Department of Biological Sciences and Environmental Sciences Program, Arkansas State University, State University, AR 72467, USA
  • 2. Department of Biological Sciences and Environmental Sciences Program, Arkansas State University, State University, AR 72467, USA & Water Research Group, Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa

Description

Fig. 6. Histograms of trap counts by sample day and juvenile stage. The upper histograms show counts from emergence traps and the lower histograms show counts from light traps. Mean count for each histogram is shown as a dashed horizontal line. See text for an explanation of the number of sampling days shown in each plot.

Notes

Published as part of Artim, J.M. & Sikkel, P.C., 2016, Comparison of sampling methodologies and estimation of population parameters for a temporary fish ectoparasite, pp. 145-157 in International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 5 (2) on page 153, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2016.05.003, http://zenodo.org/record/13007490

Files

figure.png

Files (37.7 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:2a5d954131ea99be95e5f15470967187
17.1 kB Preview Download
md5:37c9ca3a85f7ab2190e7b8ab80904cd2
20.6 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Related works

Is part of
Journal article: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2016.05.003 (DOI)
Journal article: urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:FF86FFB5FFA0FF8D34508556FF88BA40 (LSID)
Journal article: https://zenodo.org/record/13007490 (URL)