УВІДПОВІДНЕННЯ ТЕРМІНІВ ЛОГІКИ НОРМАМ СУЧАСНОЇ УКРАЇНСЬКОЇ МОВИ
Creators
Description
Considering the importance of rational, effective professional language (for
thinking and communication), the subject of the study, the results of which we
presented in this article, is the analysis of the consistency of logic terms with the
norms of Ukrainian terminological standards. This article is about the observance
of linguistic norms, in particular, giving preference to Ukrainian-speaking terms
against foreign-language ones (a very large percentage of foreign-language terms
in the field of logic is evident) as well as the delimitation of the names of action,
events and consequences by the form of the word. Having achieved these objectives
would, at the same time, lead to the adoption of terms of logic and unification of
formally-linguistic means during the creation of terms.
The research was to do the following: 1) the discovery of those terms of logic
that do not meet the requirements of the DSTU on terminology; 2) the analysis of
the possible ways to achieve the correspondence between terms and terminological
standards of Ukraine.
As a result of the research, we have constructed the series of interrelated
process logic terms: name of the action by the verb – name of the action by verbal
noun – name of the completed action (event) by the verb – name of the event by the
verbal noun – name of the consequence of action by the verbal noun. We constructed
such rows for terms that are the names of operations for obtaining new knowledge:
generalization, restriction, derivation, proof, refutation, making a conclusion,
deduction, making an assumption, making of a hypothesis, implication. We used
the following requirements during the construction of these series of terms:
1) all the terms of each series must be created on the same lexical basis;
2) As the terms we should use such words, in which the meaning of the word is
consistent with its form, that is, if the main purpose in accordance with a particular
form of the word is an action, an event, or a consequence of an event, then the
meaning of a word must be the action, the event or the consequence of the event,
respectively.
If, for example, the main purpose of the verbal noun with suffixes -annia,
-ennia is to denote an unfinished or completed action, then it is incorrect to use it to
denote the consequence of an event.
When creating a system of terms, we have established the following
relationships between them: proof – is a deduction in the case, when as a conclusion
we try to confirm the truthfulness of a given thesis; refutation – is a deduction in
the case, when as a conclusion we try to confirm the falseness of a predefined
thesis; derivation – is a deduction in the case, when the desired conclusion is not
predefined; making an assumption – is the creation of allegedly true affirmations;
making of a hypothesis – is the creation of probably true affirmations in the field
of science.
As a result of the study of the coherence of widely used logic terms with the
requirements of terminological standards, we have found out that in the Ukrainian
terminology system of logic there is a large number of terms that are not consistent
with the terminological standards and, therefore, we proposed new linguistically
correct terms (in a number of cases we proposed linguistically correct terms-duplicates in order to be able to choose the most appropriate one).
Files
Obrii 39_2018_вивід (1)-131-143.pdf
Files
(273.0 kB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:d69cda7a6dedb64ce522e59e080079de
|
273.0 kB | Preview Download |