A Hospital-Based Retrospective Assessment of the Indications and Outcome of Surgical Management of Local Complications of Acute Pancreatitis
- 1. Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, Government Medical College, Bettiah, Bihar, India
- 2. Assistant Professor and HOD, General Surgery, Government Medical College, Bettiah, Bihar, India
- 3. Senior Resident, Department of General Surgery, Government Medical College, Bettiah, Bihar, India
Description
Aim: This study aims to evaluate the indication and outcome of different surgical management modalities in local complications of acute pancreatitis. Methods: A hospital-based retrospective study was conducted in the department of surgery at Government Medical College, Bettiah, Bihar, India for 12 months. A purposive sampling method was utilized to recruit the patients. Results: 450 patients were admitted to the surgery department with the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis or with complications of acute pancreatitis. Among them, 60 patients had local complications due to acute pancreatitis. All patients were managed using the step-up approach, starting with conservative management and minimally invasive intervention when warranted. Twenty-five patients required surgical intervention due to failure of endoscopic or radiological intervention or positions of lesions being inaccessible to these techniques. Out of 25 patients, 56% were females. 52% had ethanol etiology and 36% had pseudocyst pancreatic fluid collection. According to the location, 68% were at body or tail. According to Clavien-Dindo classification, 32% were in grade 4 followed by grade 1 (24%) and grade 4 (20%). Conclusion: Although various endoscopic techniques are now available to manage the pancreatic fluid collection and pancreatic necrosis, surgery remains essential in managing the disease.
Abstract (English)
Aim: This study aims to evaluate the indication and outcome of different surgical management modalities in local complications of acute pancreatitis. Methods: A hospital-based retrospective study was conducted in the department of surgery at Government Medical College, Bettiah, Bihar, India for 12 months. A purposive sampling method was utilized to recruit the patients. Results: 450 patients were admitted to the surgery department with the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis or with complications of acute pancreatitis. Among them, 60 patients had local complications due to acute pancreatitis. All patients were managed using the step-up approach, starting with conservative management and minimally invasive intervention when warranted. Twenty-five patients required surgical intervention due to failure of endoscopic or radiological intervention or positions of lesions being inaccessible to these techniques. Out of 25 patients, 56% were females. 52% had ethanol etiology and 36% had pseudocyst pancreatic fluid collection. According to the location, 68% were at body or tail. According to Clavien-Dindo classification, 32% were in grade 4 followed by grade 1 (24%) and grade 4 (20%). Conclusion: Although various endoscopic techniques are now available to manage the pancreatic fluid collection and pancreatic necrosis, surgery remains essential in managing the disease.
Files
IJPCR,Vol15,Issue2,Article194.pdf
Files
(294.7 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:1fbea3e5eee5b81ad2a9e944ef1ef183
|
294.7 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Dates
- Accepted
-
2023-02-21
Software
- Repository URL
- https://impactfactor.org/PDF/IJPCR/15/IJPCR,Vol15,Issue2,Article194.pdf
- Development Status
- Active
References
- 1. Cruz-Santamaría DM, Taxonera C, Giner M. Update on pathogenesis and clinical management of acute pancreatitis. World journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology. 2012 Jun 6;3(3):60. 2. Yadav D, Lowenfels AB. The epidemiology of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology. 2013 May 1;144(6):1252-61. 3. Gooszen HG, Besselink MG, van Santvoort HC, Bollen TL. Surgical treatment of acute pancreatitis. Langenbeck's archives of surgery. 2013 Aug; 398:799-806. 4. Shen HN, Lu CL, Li CY. Epidemiology of first-attack acute pancreatitis in Taiwan from 2000 through 2009: a nationwide population-based study. Pancreas. 2012 Jul 1;41(5):696-702. 5. Yadav D, O'connell M, Papachristou GI. Natural history following the first attack of acute pancreatitis. Official journal of the American College of Gastroenterology| ACG. 2012 Jul 1;107(7):1096-103. 6. Wu BU, Johannes RS, Sun X, Tabak Y, Conwell DL, Banks PA. The early prediction of mortality in acute pancreatitis: a large population-based study. Gut. 2008 Dec 1;57(12):1698- 703. 7. Beger HG, Rau BM. Severe acute pancreatitis: clinical course and management. World journal of gastroenterology: WJG. 2007 Oct 10; 13(38):5043. 8. IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2013;13 (2):48-53. 9. Lancaster A, Zwijacz M. Acute pancreatitis and fluid-filled collections: etiology and endoscopic management. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2019;42(5):417-9. 10. Baron TH, DiMaio CJ, Wang AY, Morgan KA. American gastroenterological association clinical practice update: Management ofPancreatic Necrosis. Gastroenterol. 2020;158(1):67-75. 11. Lancaster A, Zwijacz M. Acute pancreatitis and fluid-filled collections: etiology and endoscopic management. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2019;42(5):417-9. 12. Baron TH, DiMaio CJ, Wang AY, Morgan KA. American gastroenterological association clinical practice update: Management of Pancreatic Necrosis. Gastroenterol. 2020;158(1):67-75. 13. Hollemans RA, Bakker OJ, Boermeester MA, et al. Superiority of Step-up Approach vs Open Necrosectomy in Long-term Follow-up of Patients with Necrotizing Pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 2019; 156(4):1016-26. 14. Dalsania R, Willingham FF. Treatment of walled-off pancreatic necrosis. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2019;35(5):478- 82. 15. Baron TH, DiMaio CJ, Wang AY, Morgan KA. American gastroenterological association clinical practice update: Management of Pancreatic Necrosis. Gastroenterol. 2020;158(1):67-75. 16. Barthet M, Lamblin G, Gasmi M, Vitton V, Desjeux A, Grimaud JC. Clinical usefulness of a treatment algorithm for pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67(2):245- 52. 17. Nealon WH, Walser E. Surgical management of complications associated with percutaneous and/or endoscopic management of pseudocyst of the pancreas. Ann Surg. 2005; 241(6):948-57. 18. Catalano MF, Geenen JE, Schmalz MJ, Johnson GK, Dean RS, Hogan WJ. Treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts with ductal communication by transpapillary pancreatic duct endoprosthesis. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;42(3):214-8. 19. Lopes CV, Pesenti C, Bories E, Caillol F, Giovannini M. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided endoscopic transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts. Arq Gastroenterol. 2008; 45(1):17-21. 20. Antillon MR, Shah RJ, Stiegmann G, Chen YK. Single-step EUS-guided transmural drainage of simple and complicated pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63(6):797- 803. 21. Krüger M, Schneider AS, Manns MP, Meier PN. Endoscopic management of pancreatic pseudocysts or abscesses after an EUS-guided 1-step procedure for initial access. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63(3):409-16. 22. Matsuoka L, Alexopoulos SP. Surgical Management of Pancreatic Pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2018;28(2):131-41. 23. Andersson B, Andrén-Sandberg Å, Andersson R. Survey of the management of pancreatic pseudocysts in Sweden. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;44(10):1252-8. 24. Ghimire R et al. Int Surg J. 2021 Nov;8(11):3238-3242 international Surgery Journal. 2021;8(11):3242. 25. Yoon SB, Chang JH, Lee IS. Treatment of Pancreatic Fluid Collections. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2018; 72(3):97-103. 26. Obermeyer RJ, Fisher WE, Salameh JR, Jeyapalan M, Sweeney JF, Brunicardi FC. Laparoscopic pancreatic cystogastrostomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2003; 13(4):250-3. 27. Zaichick V., Diagnosis of Thyroid Malignancy using Chemical Elements of Nodular Tissue determined by Nuclear Analytical Methods. Journal of Medical Research and Health Sciences, 2022; 5(3): 1808–1824.