There is a newer version of the record available.

Published April 30, 2024 | Version http://impactfactor.org/PDF/IJTPR/14/IJTPR,Vol14,Issue4,Article32.pdf
Journal article Open

A Retrospective Study Determining the Association between Echocardiographic LVFP Parameter, VMT Score and Clinical Outcomes of HFpEF

  • 1. Senior Resident (Academic), Department of Cardiology, IGIMS, PATNA, Bihar, India
  • 2. Additional Professor, Department of Cardiology, IGIMS, PATNA, Bihar, India

Description

Background: Choledocholitiasis develops in about 10–15% of patients with gallbladder stones. For patients with cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis open exploration of the bile duct was the principal treatment for almost 100 years. But with advancement in endoscopic instrumentation and expertise, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography has evolved as the primary choice of treatment for biliary stones and it is successful in more than 90% of patients. Currently, the most accepted protocol in these cases involves endoscopic clearance of CBD followed at a later date by laparoscopic cholecystectomy. But there is no consensus regarding the exact time gap between these two procedures. Faced with the frequent problem of a ‘difficult’ laparoscopic cholecystectomy in these cases, the current study was undertaken to attempt to define the ideal time gap between the two procedures for the best possible outcome. Methods: In this study, 30 patients underwent ERCP with or without sphincterotomy followed at various intervals by elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. According to these intervals, the patient’s data were assigned to one of the two groups : group A (<3 weeks) or group B (>3 weeks). A prospective comparative study was conducted to compare intra-operative parameters and post-operative outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy done at different intervals after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography to decide upon the optimal timing for the surgery. Results: Overall rate of partial or subtotal cholecystectomy including all patients was 16.7% with significantly higher in delayed group B. Need for a drain was significantly higher as the interval between ERCP and LC progressed (p value 0.014). The mean duration of surgery for group A was 91.75 min and for group B was 127.78 min and this difference was statistically significant at p value < 0.05. A lower incidence of post-operative jaundice, bleeding, bile leak and wound infection was observed in group A than in the group B. Overall, statistically significant higher complication rates were observed in late period group B than in the early period group A. Patients in group B had more prolonged post-operative hospital stay with a mean of 5.0 days (SD 3.08). Conclusion: We recommend early laparoscopic cholecystectomy after ERCP for common bile duct disease could well be an answer in reducing rate of subtotal or partial cholecystectomy, duration of surgery, post-operative complications and post-operative hospital stay.

Abstract (English)

Background: Choledocholitiasis develops in about 10–15% of patients with gallbladder stones. For patients with cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis open exploration of the bile duct was the principal treatment for almost 100 years. But with advancement in endoscopic instrumentation and expertise, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography has evolved as the primary choice of treatment for biliary stones and it is successful in more than 90% of patients. Currently, the most accepted protocol in these cases involves endoscopic clearance of CBD followed at a later date by laparoscopic cholecystectomy. But there is no consensus regarding the exact time gap between these two procedures. Faced with the frequent problem of a ‘difficult’ laparoscopic cholecystectomy in these cases, the current study was undertaken to attempt to define the ideal time gap between the two procedures for the best possible outcome. Methods: In this study, 30 patients underwent ERCP with or without sphincterotomy followed at various intervals by elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. According to these intervals, the patient’s data were assigned to one of the two groups : group A (<3 weeks) or group B (>3 weeks). A prospective comparative study was conducted to compare intra-operative parameters and post-operative outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy done at different intervals after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography to decide upon the optimal timing for the surgery. Results: Overall rate of partial or subtotal cholecystectomy including all patients was 16.7% with significantly higher in delayed group B. Need for a drain was significantly higher as the interval between ERCP and LC progressed (p value 0.014). The mean duration of surgery for group A was 91.75 min and for group B was 127.78 min and this difference was statistically significant at p value < 0.05. A lower incidence of post-operative jaundice, bleeding, bile leak and wound infection was observed in group A than in the group B. Overall, statistically significant higher complication rates were observed in late period group B than in the early period group A. Patients in group B had more prolonged post-operative hospital stay with a mean of 5.0 days (SD 3.08). Conclusion: We recommend early laparoscopic cholecystectomy after ERCP for common bile duct disease could well be an answer in reducing rate of subtotal or partial cholecystectomy, duration of surgery, post-operative complications and post-operative hospital stay.

Files

IJTPR,Vol14,Issue4,Article32.pdf

Files (408.6 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:aaf2fd77f2d22f2646f85f3da7377fd0
408.6 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • 1. Braunwald E, Mann DL, Zipes DP, Libby P, Bonow RO. Braunwald's heart disease: a textbook of cardiovascular medicine. InBraunwald's heart disease: A textbook of cardiovascular medicine 2015 (pp. 1028-1028). 2. Redfield MM. Heart failure--an epidemic of uncertain proportions. N Engl J Med. 2002 Oct 31;347(18):1442-4. 3. Remme WJ, McMurray JJ, Rauch B, Zannad F, Keukelaar K, Cohen-Solal A, Lopez-Sendon J, Hobbs FD, Grobbee DE, Boccanelli A, Cline C, Macarie C, Dietz R, Ruzyllo W. Public awareness of heart failure in Europe: first results from SHAPE. Eur Heart J. 2005 Nov;26 (22):2413-21. 4. American Heart Association. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: 2005 Update. Dallas, Tex: American Heart Association; 2005. 5. Hunt SA, Abraham WT, Chin MH, Feldman AM, Francis GS, Ganiats TG, Jessup M, Konstam MA, Mancini DM, Michl K, Oates JA, Rahko PS, Silver MA, Stevenson LW, Yancy CW, Antman EM, Smith SC Jr, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Halperin JL, Hiratzka LF, Jacobs AK, Nishimura R, Ornato JP, Page RL, Riegel B; American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; American College of Chest Physicians; International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation; Heart Rhythm Society. ACC/AHA 2005 Guideline Update for the Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Heart Failure in the Adult: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure): developed in collaboration with the American College of Chest Physicians and the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2005 Sep 20;112(12):e154-235. 6. Goldberg LR, Jessup M. Stage B heart failure: management of asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Circulation. 2006 Jun 20; 113(24):2851-60. 7. Swedberg K, Cleland J, Dargie H, Drexler H, Follath F, Komajda M, Tavazzi L, Smiseth OA, Gavazzi A, Haverich A, Hoes A, Jaarsma T, Korewicki J, Lévy S, Linde C, LopezSendon JL, Nieminen MS, Piérard L, Remme WJ; Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure: executive summary (update 2005): The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2005 Jun;26(11): 1115-40. 8. Oh JK. Echocardiography in heart failure: beyond diagnosis. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2007 Jan; 8(1):4-14. 9. Picano E. Sustainability of medical imaging. BMJ. 2004 Mar 6;328(7439):578-80. 10. Picano E. Economic and biological costs of cardiac imaging. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2005 May 25; 3:13. 11. European Commission on Radiation protection 118: Referral guidelines for imaging. 12. International Commission on Radiation Protection . Radiation and your patient: a guide for medical practitioners. A web module produced by Committee 3 of the International Commis- sion on Radiological Protection. United Kingdom: Pergamon Press; 2001. 13. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Radiological protection in Biomedical Research. United Kingdom: Pergamon Press; 1991. 14. Harada T, Obokata M, Omote K, Iwano H, Ikoma T, Okada K, Yoshida K, Kato T, Kurosawa K, Nagai T, Negishi K. Independent and incremental prognostic value of semiquantitative measures of tricuspid regurgitation severity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. European Heart Journal-Cardiovascular Imaging. 2021 Dec 1;22(12):1443-51. 15. Nagueh SF, Smiseth OA, Appleton CP, Byrd BF, Dokainish H, Edvardsen T, Flachskampf FA, Gillebert TC, Klein AL, Lancellotti P, Marino P. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. European Journal of Echocardiography. 2016 Jul 15; 17 (12):1321-60. 16. Murayama M, Iwano H, Nishino H, Tsujinaga S, Nakabachi M, Yokoyama S, Aiba M, Okada K, Kaga S, Sarashina M, Chiba Y. Simple twodimensional echocardiographic scoring system for the estimation of left ventricular filling pressure. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2021 Jul 1;34(7):723-34. 17. Pellicori P, Shah P, Cuthbert J, Urbinati A, Zhang J, Kallvikbacka‐Bennett A, Clark AL, Cleland JG. Prevalence, pattern and clinical relevance of ultrasound indices of congestion in outpatients with heart failure. European journal of heart failure. 2019 Jul;21(7):904-16. 18. Owan TE, Hodge DO, Herges RM, Jacobsen SJ, Roger VL, Redfield MM. Trends in prevalence and outcome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. New England Journal of Medicine. 2006 Jul 20;355(3):251-9. 19. Bhatia RS, Tu JV, Lee DS, Austin PC, Fang J, Haouzi A, Gong Y, Liu PP. Outcome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in a population-based study. New England Journal of Medicine. 2006 Jul 20;355(3):260-9. 20. Borlaug BA. The pathophysiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Nature Reviews Cardiology. 2014 Sep;11(9):507-15. 21. Shah AM, Cikes M, Prasad N, Li G, Getchevski S, Claggett B, Rizkala A, Lukashevich I, O'Meara E, Ryan JJ, Shah SJ. Echocardiographic features of patients with heart failure and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2019 Dec 10;74(23):2858-73. 22. Borlaug BA, Nishimura RA, Sorajja P, Lam CS, Redfield MM. Exercise hemodynamics enhance diagnosis of early heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circulation: Heart Failure. 2010 Sep;3(5):588-95. 23. Dorfs S, Zeh W, Hochholzer W, Jander N, Kienzle RP, Pieske B, Neumann FJ. Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure during exercise and long-term mortality in patients with suspected heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. European heart journal. 2014 Nov 21;35(44):3103-12. 24. Rethy L, Borlaug BA, Redfield MM, Oh JK, Shah SJ, Patel RB. Application of guidelinebased echocardiographic assessment of left atrial pressure to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2021 May 1;34(5): 455-64. 25. Hasenfuß G, Hayward C, Burkhoff D, Silvestry FE, McKenzie S, Gustafsson F, Malek F, Van der Heyden J, Lang I, Petrie MC, Cleland JG. A transcatheter intracardiac shunt device for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (REDUCE LAP-HF): a multicentre, openlabel, single-arm, phase 1 trial. The Lancet. 2016 Mar 26;387(10025):1298-304. 26. Adamson PB, Abraham WT, Bourge RC, Costanzo MR, Hasan A, Yadav C, Henderson J, Cowart P, Stevenson LW. Wireless pulmonary artery pressure monitoring guides management to reduce decompensation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circulation: Heart Failure. 2014 Nov;7(6):935-44.