Open Research Europe

Part of EU Open Research Repository
Published July 10, 2024 | Version 2
Journal article Open

Scoping review and evidence mapping of interventions aimed at improving reproducible and replicable science: Protocol

Authors/Creators

  • 1. University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • 2. Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Methodology of Educational Sciences Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
  • 3. Know-Center GmbH, Graz, Austria
  • 4. Institute of Interactive Systems and Data Science, Technische Universitat Graz, Graz, Styria, Austria
  • 5. Amsterdam Public Health, Medical Library, Amsterdam UMC, Univ of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • 6. Bennett Institute for Applied Data Science, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK
  • 7. Faculty of Health, Medicine & Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
  • 8. Research Coordination Office & RDM Competence Centre, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
  • 9. Institut Universitaire de France, Paris, France
  • 10. Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy
  • 11. Institute of Animal Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kaposvar, Hungary
  • 12. Department of Soil Science, Institute of Environmental Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gödöllő, Hungary
  • 13. Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Files

openreseurope-3-19062.pdf

Files (887.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:dd398655e88b6f7f4c110e0992f39215
887.9 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Cites
10.1371/journal.pone.0024357 (DOI)
10.1080/1364557032000119616 (DOI)
10.1101/2022.12.08.519666 (DOI)
10.1177/2515245920958687 (DOI)
10.2777/186782 (DOI)
10.2777/341654 (DOI)
10.1098/rsos.201494 (DOI)
10.1016/j.jml.2022.104332 (DOI)
10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 (DOI)
10.1038/s41562-016-0021 (DOI)
10.11124/JBIES-21-00483 (DOI)
10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-114157 (DOI)
10.1177/2515245920918872 (DOI)
10.11124/JBIES-21-00242 (DOI)
10.1126/science.aah6168 (DOI)
10.1073/pnas.1708290115 (DOI)
Is new version of
10.12688/openreseurope.16567.1 (DOI)

References

  • Alsheikh-Ali AA, Qureshi W, Al-Mallah MH (2011). Public availability of published research data in high-impact journals. PLoS One. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024357
  • Arksey H, O'Malley L (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616
  • Davidson AR, Barbour G, Nakagawa S (2022). Taxonomy of interventions at academic institutions to improve research quality. BioRxiv. doi:10.1101/2022.12.08.519666
  • Ebersole CR, Mathur MB, Baranski E (2020). Many labs 5: testing pre-data-collection peer review as an intervention to increase replicability. Adv Methods Pract Psychol Sci. doi:10.1177/2515245920958687
  • (2022). Assessing the reproducibility of research results in EU Framework Programmes for Research: final report. doi:10.2777/186782
  • Baker L (2020). Reproducibility of scientific results in the EU: scoping report. doi:10.2777/341654
  • Hardwicke TE, Bohn M, MacDonald K (2021). Analytic reproducibility in articles receiving open data badges at the journal : an observational study. R Soc Open Sci. doi:10.1098/rsos.201494
  • Laurinavichyute A, Yadav H, Vasishth S (2022). Share the code, not just the data: A case study of the reproducibility of articles published in the Journal of Memory and Language under the open data policy. J Mem Lang. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2022.104332
  • Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M (2015). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
  • Munafò MR, Nosek BA, Bishop DV (2017). A manifesto for reproducible science. Nat Hum Behav. doi:10.1038/s41562-016-0021
  • Munn Z, Pollock D, Khalil H (2022). What are scoping reviews? Providing a formal definition of scoping reviews as a type of evidence synthesis. JBI Evid Synth. doi:10.11124/JBIES-21-00483
  • Nosek BA, Hardwicke TE, Moshontz H (2022). Replicability, robustness, and reproducibility in psychological science. Annu Rev Psychol. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-114157
  • Obels P, Lakens D, Coles NA (2020). Analysis of open data and computational reproducibility in registered reports in psychology. Adv Methods Pract Psychol Sci. doi:10.1177/2515245920918872
  • Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P (2022). Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols. JBI Evid Synth. doi:10.11124/JBIES-21-00242
  • Stodden V, McNutt M, Bailey DH (2016). Enhancing reproducibility for computational methods. Science. doi:10.1126/science.aah6168
  • Stodden V, Seiler J, Ma Z (2018). An empirical analysis of journal policy effectiveness for computational reproducibility. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. doi:10.1073/pnas.1708290115