Published August 1, 2009 | Version Accepted version
Journal article Open

Ultrasound validity in the measurement of knee cartilage thickness

  • 1. Hospital Severo Ochoa

Contributors

Contact person:

  • 1. Hospital Severo Ochoa

Description

Objective. To assess the multiexaminer reproducibility and the accuracy comparing with
cadaver anatomic specimens of ultrasound (US) measurement of femoral articular cartilage
(FAC) thickness.
Methods. In 8 flexed cadaver knees, FAC thickness was blindly, independently and
consecutively measured twice by 10 rheumatologists at the lateral condyle (LC), medial
condyle (MC) and intercondylar notch (IN) with US. After the US measurements, the knees
were dissected. Articular cartilage integrity was evaluated macroscopically in the femoral
condyles. FAC thickness was blindly measured in the specimens using a stereoscopic
magnifying loupe and a digitized image software. Interexaminer and intraexaminer reliability
of US FAC thickness measurement and agreement between US and anatomic measurements
were assessed by estimating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
Results. Interexaminer ICCs were higher than 0.90 for MC (p<0.001) and IN (p<0.001) and
higher than 0.75 for LC (p<0.01). Mean intraexaminer ICCs were 0.832 for MC (p<0.001),
0.696 for LC (p<0.001), and, 0.701 for IN (p<0.001). Agreement between US and anatomic
FAC thickness measurements was good for MC (ICC, 0.719; p=0.020) and poor for LC
(p=0.285) and IN (p=0.332). Bland-Altman analysis showed that the difference between US and
anatomic values was considerably high in the one knee with severely damaged FAC. After
eliminating this knee from the analysis, ICCs were 0.883 (p<0.001) for MC, 0.795 (p=0.016)
for LC and 0.732 for IN (p=0.071).
Conclusion. US demonstrated a good reproducibility in FAC thickness measurement by
multiple examiners. In addition, US FAC thickness measurement was accurate in normal to
moderately damaged cartilage.

Files

2009 ARD POSTPRINT.pdf

Files (324.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:d47f2ff6a6dfe1ef1cfa943bf23fabf7
324.1 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

Related works

Dates

Accepted
2009-08-01

References

  • Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Aug;68(8):1322-7