Ultrasound validity in the measurement of knee cartilage thickness
Description
Objective. To assess the multiexaminer reproducibility and the accuracy comparing with
cadaver anatomic specimens of ultrasound (US) measurement of femoral articular cartilage
(FAC) thickness.
Methods. In 8 flexed cadaver knees, FAC thickness was blindly, independently and
consecutively measured twice by 10 rheumatologists at the lateral condyle (LC), medial
condyle (MC) and intercondylar notch (IN) with US. After the US measurements, the knees
were dissected. Articular cartilage integrity was evaluated macroscopically in the femoral
condyles. FAC thickness was blindly measured in the specimens using a stereoscopic
magnifying loupe and a digitized image software. Interexaminer and intraexaminer reliability
of US FAC thickness measurement and agreement between US and anatomic measurements
were assessed by estimating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
Results. Interexaminer ICCs were higher than 0.90 for MC (p<0.001) and IN (p<0.001) and
higher than 0.75 for LC (p<0.01). Mean intraexaminer ICCs were 0.832 for MC (p<0.001),
0.696 for LC (p<0.001), and, 0.701 for IN (p<0.001). Agreement between US and anatomic
FAC thickness measurements was good for MC (ICC, 0.719; p=0.020) and poor for LC
(p=0.285) and IN (p=0.332). Bland-Altman analysis showed that the difference between US and
anatomic values was considerably high in the one knee with severely damaged FAC. After
eliminating this knee from the analysis, ICCs were 0.883 (p<0.001) for MC, 0.795 (p=0.016)
for LC and 0.732 for IN (p=0.071).
Conclusion. US demonstrated a good reproducibility in FAC thickness measurement by
multiple examiners. In addition, US FAC thickness measurement was accurate in normal to
moderately damaged cartilage.
Files
2009 ARD POSTPRINT.pdf
Files
(324.1 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:d47f2ff6a6dfe1ef1cfa943bf23fabf7
|
324.1 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Identifiers
- PMID
- 18684742
Related works
- Documents
- 10.1136/ard.2008.090738 (DOI)
Dates
- Accepted
-
2009-08-01
References
- Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Aug;68(8):1322-7