Prevalence and Associated Factors with Maternal Delays in Seeking Emergency Obstetrics Care in Jharkhand
Authors/Creators
- 1. M.B.B.S. MD, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, R.I.M.S., Ranchi, Specialist Medical Officer, Sadar Hospital, Dhanbaad, Jharkhand, India
- 2. M.B.B.S., MS, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, DNB, Consultant Gynaecologist, Prakash Chandra Seva Sadan Hospital, Daltonganj, Palamu, Jharkhand, India
Description
In Jharkhand, India, pregnant women postpone emergency obstetric care. This study examines the prevalence and factors involved. A descriptive cross-sectional survey was used to survey 300 rural, semi-urban, and urban women from the state. 40% of individuals experienced substantial care delays, with rural locations having 60%. These delays were caused by poor transportation, limited education, and conventional health practices. Logistic regression research confirmed these factors as delayed care-seeking predictors. The study emphasizes the need for focused actions to enhance transit infrastructure, education, and cultural practices that delay emergency obstetric services. These methods are essential for lowering delayed maternity care risks and enhancing Jharkhand’s maternal and neonatal health.
Abstract (English)
In Jharkhand, India, pregnant women postpone emergency obstetric care. This study examines the prevalence and factors involved. A descriptive cross-sectional survey was used to survey 300 rural, semi-urban, and urban women from the state. 40% of individuals experienced substantial care delays, with rural locations having 60%. These delays were caused by poor transportation, limited education, and conventional health practices. Logistic regression research confirmed these factors as delayed care-seeking predictors. The study emphasizes the need for focused actions to enhance transit infrastructure, education, and cultural practices that delay emergency obstetric services. These methods are essential for lowering delayed maternity care risks and enhancing Jharkhand’s maternal and neonatal health.
Files
IJPCR,Vol16,Issue4,Article225.pdf
Files
(303.6 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:5793f4cccc61fcea1ee16e2d666f5679
|
303.6 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Dates
- Accepted
-
2024-03-25
Software
- Repository URL
- https://impactfactor.org/PDF/IJPCR/16/IJPCR,Vol16,Issue4,Article225.pdf
- Development Status
- Active
References
- 1. Gupta S, et al. Barriers to emergency obstetric care in rural India: A comprehensive review. International Journal of Women's Health, 201 8;10:205-217. 2. Sharma S, et al. Delays in accessing obstetric care in rural Nepal: A health facility-based study. Journal of Rural Health, 2019;35(4):54 1-550. 3. Adeoye IA, et al. Influence of cultural practices on maternal mortality in Southwest Nigeria. Public Health Reviews, 2020;41:8. 4. WHO. Strategies towards ending preventable maternal mortality (EPMM). World Health Organization, 2015. 5. Thaddeus S, Maine D. Too far to walk: Maternal mortality in context. Social Science & Medicine, 1994;38(8):1091-1110. 6. Pathak PK, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in the use of maternal health care services in India: Trends between 1992 and 2006. Demography, 2010;47(4):781-805. 7. Raj A, et al. Changes in prevalence of girl child marriage in South Asia. JAMA, 2009; 30 1(22):2362-2364. 8. Bhatia JC, Cleland J. Healthcare seeking and expenditure by young Indian mothers in the public and private sectors. Health Policy and Planning, 2001;16(1):55-61. 9. Singh PK, Rai RK, Alagarajan M, Singh L. Determinants of maternity care services utilization among married adolescents in rural India. PLoS ONE, 2012;7(2): e31666. 10. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Macro International. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), 2015-16: India. Mumbai: IIPS, 2017. 11. Kumar S, et al. Utilization of postnatal care for newborns and its association with neonatal mortality in India: An analytical appraisal. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2012;12:33. 12. McCarthy J, Maine D. A framework for analyzing the determinants of maternal mortality. Studies in Family Planning, 1992;23(1):23-33. 13. Ronsmans C, Graham WJ; Lancet Maternal Survival Series steering group. Maternal mortality: who, when, where, and why. The Lancet, 2006; 368(9542):1189-1200. 14. Lozano R, et al. Progress towards Millennium Development Goals 4 and 5 on maternal and child mortality: an updated systematic analysis. The Lancet, 2011;378(9797):1139-1165. 15. Gabrysch S, Campbell OM. Still too far to walk A literature review of the determinants of delivery service use. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2009;9:34. 16. Choudhary R, et al. Factors influencing the use of maternal healthcare services and childhood immunization in Swaziland. International Journal of Equity Health, 2015;14:32. 17. Kesterton AJ, Cleland J. Neonatal care in rural Karnataka: Healthy and harmful practices, the potential for change. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2009;9:20. 18. Iyengar K, Iyengar SD, Suhalka V, Agarwal K. Pregnancy-related deaths in rural Rajasthan, India: exploring causes, context, and care-seeking through verbal autopsy. Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition, 2009;27(2): 293-302. 19. Stephenson R, Tsui AO. Contextual influences on reproductive health service use in Uttar Pradesh, India. Studies in Family Planning, 20 02;33(4):309-320. 20. 20. Speizer IS, Whittle L, Carter M. Gender relations and reproductive decision making in Honduras. International Family Planning Perspectives, 2005;31(3):131-139.