Published May 8, 2024 | Version v.1
Journal article Restricted

Current practice in assessment and management of malnutrition in surgical oncology practice - An ESSO-EYSAC snapshot analysis

  • 1. Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany
  • 2. Mount Sinai Department of Urology, New York, United States
  • 3. Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
  • 4. Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  • 5. Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium
  • 6. Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Sweden
  • 7. Surgical Oncology Clinic, Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia
  • 8. Digestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospitals, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Description

 

Abstract

Introduction: Malnutrition is common in patients suffering from malignant diseases and has a major impact on patient outcomes. Prevention and early detection are crucial for effective treatment. This study aimed to investigate current international practice in the assessment and management of malnutrition in surgical oncology departments.

Material and methods: The survey was designed by European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO) and ESSO Young Surgeons and Alumni Club (EYSAC) Research Academy as an online questionnaire with 41 questions addressing three main areas: participant demographics, malnutrition assessment, and perioperative nutritional standards. The survey was distributed from October to November 2021 via emails, social media and the ESSO website to surgical networks focussing on surgical oncologists. Results were collected and analysed by an independent team.

Results: A total of 156 participants from 39 different countries answered the survey, reflecting a response rate of 1.4%. Surgeons reported treating a mean of 22.4 patients per month. 38% of all patients treated in surgical oncology departments were routinely screened for malnutrition. 52% of patients were perceived as being at risk for malnutrition. The most used screening tool was the "Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool" (MUST). 68% of participants agreed that the surgeon is responsible for assessing preoperative nutritional status. 49% of patients were routinely seen by dieticians. In cases of severe malnutrition, 56% considered postponing the operation.

Conclusions: The reported rate of malnutrition screening by surgical oncologists is lower than expected (38%). This indicates a need for improved awareness of malnutrition in surgical oncology, and nutritional screening.

Notes (English)

* Corresponding author. University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany.
E-mail address: Andreas.Brandl@med.uni.heidelberg.de (A. Brandl).

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted to users with access.

Additional details

Identifiers

ISSN
0748-7983
PMID
37429796

Dates

Available
2023-06-25
Issued
2024-05

Software

Repository URL
https://zenodo.org/uploads/12686078
Development Status
Active