Published December 31, 2015 | Version v1
Figure Open

Fig. 2. A and B in Surface Coat Differences between and Non-Invasive Entamoeba dispar Invasive Entamoeba histolytica

Description

Fig. 2. A and B. Cell coat of E. histolytica and E. dispar as observed in thin sections after treatment with Con A. The cell coat of E. histolytica (A) was observed as a thick layer of relatively homogenous electron- dense precipitate all along the cell surface. In contrast, in E. dispar, (B) the cell coat was strongly positive. Bar: 0.1 µm. C to D. Confocal and phase contrast microscopy images of amoebae after incubation with fluoresce- in-tagged Concanavalin A. As observed by confocal microscopy (C) and phase contrast (D) in E. histolytica trophozoites the displacement of surface lectin receptors formed a defined cap at the posterior pole of the cell, but such structure is not formed by E. dispar and only irregular patches were seen (E) confocal and (F) phase contrast. Bar: 20 µm.

Notes

Published as part of González-Robles, Arturo, Chávez-Munguía, Bibiana, Salazar-Villatoro, Lizbeth, Lagunes-Guillén, Anel, Hernández-Ramírez, Verónica Ivonne, Talamás-Rohana, Patricia & Martínez-Palomo, Adolfo, 2015, Surface Coat Differences between and Non-Invasive Entamoeba dispar Invasive Entamoeba histolytica, pp. 209-218 in Acta Protozoologica 54 (3) on page 213, DOI: 10.4467/16890027AP.15.017.3214, http://zenodo.org/record/12638166

Files

figure.png

Files (810.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:ee2e73db3d70f26d5e06b479c87edd97
810.1 kB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Related works

Is part of
Journal article: 10.4467/16890027AP.15.017.3214 (DOI)
Journal article: urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:944C131BFFA8AC27C75AFFE1FF9AFFCE (LSID)
Journal article: https://zenodo.org/record/12638166 (URL)