Published June 21, 2024 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Twenty years of ecosystem services research in Bulgaria: lessons learned and future directions from a geographical perspective

  • 1. National Institute of Geophysics, Geodesy and Geography - Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria

Description

The ecosystem services (ES) concept has established itself in recent years as the predominant paradigm for framing environmental research and policy-making. The EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 with its task for member countries to map and assess the state of ecosystems and their services has contributed vastly to the development of the ES studies in the European countries. Bulgaria was among the countries that made substantial progress in its implementation and the contribution of the geographers was of vital importance. This paper aims to provide an overview and analysis of the ES research in Bulgaria focusing on the contributions of the geographers and the spatial aspects of the studies. The information on the ES research was performed through a literature review by collecting all available published works that address the main objectives of the study. To systematize and characterize the content of the reviewed papers, a special database with a standard nomenclature was constructed. The findings from the review allowed us to identify both achievements and research gaps in the ES studies conducted by Bulgarian geographers. This enabled us to define the main research priorities of the coming years which can trace the future directions of ES research in the country. They include the development of the spatial aspects in the methodological frameworks for mapping and assessment of ES, better use of GIS-based tools for mapping ES alongside models' integration, and improvement of the publication's quality and increase of the papers published in highly rated indexed journals.

Files

BR_article_125194.pdf

Files (1.8 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:542f2e0a85203f69a6586446d64e8a3e
1.8 MB Preview Download

System files (151.2 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:36a7c980e27f69160df511cd0462e84d
151.2 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

References

  • Assenov A (2009) Natural Capital of Satovcha Municipality. Fifth International Conference "Global Changes and Regional Development", Sofia (Bulgaria), 17–18 April 2008. St. Kliment Ohridski University Press, Sofia, 33–38.
  • Assenov A (2010) Ecosystem services assessment in Satovcha Municipality by the contingent valuation method. "Geography and Regional Development" Conference, Sozopol (Bulgaria). LOPS, Sofia, 108–131.
  • Assenov A (2012) Evaluation of the ecosystem services in Satovcha Municipality applying the contingent valuation method. Annual of Sofia University, GGF, Book 2 – Geography 103: 139–169. https://www.uni-sofia.bg/index.php/bul/universitet_t/fakulteti/geologo_geografski_fakultet/oficialni_izdaniya
  • Ayanu YZ, Conrad C, Nauss T, Wegmann M, Koellner T (2012) Quantifying and mapping ecosystem services supplies and demands: A review of remote sensing applications. Environmental Science & Technology 46(16): 8529–8541. https://doi.org/10.1021/es300157u
  • Borisova B, Glushkova M, Nedkov S, Zhiyanski M, Stoycheva V (2023) Habitat maintenance assessment and mapping as priority ecosystem service in mountain protected areas. Journal of the Bulgarian Geographical Society 49: 27–42. https://doi.org/10.3897/jbgs.e109172
  • Boyanova K, Nedkov S, Burkhard B (2014) Quantification and Mapping of Flood Regulating Ecosystem Services in Different Watersheds – Case Studies in Bulgaria and Arizona, USA. In: Bandrova T, Konecny M, Zlatanova S (Eds) Thematic Cartography for the Society. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08180-9_18
  • Bratanova-Doncheva S, Gocheva K (2020) Climate Change and Ecosystem Services in Bulgaria, or What We Lose When We Win. In: Nedkov S, Zhelezov G, Ilieva N, Nikolova M, Koulov B, Naydenov K, Dimitrov S (Eds) Smart Geography. Key Challenges in Geography. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 331–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28191-5_26
  • Bratanova-Doncheva S, Fikova R, Katrandziev K, Chipev N, Dimitrova V (2014) Resilience of Ecosystem Services – Applying Ecosystem Function and Integrity Concepts to Natural Sweet Chestnut Forests in Belasitza Mountain (SW Bulgaria). Acta Horticulturae (1043): 183–190. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2014.1043.24
  • Bratanova-Doncheva S, Chipev N, Gocheva K, Vergiev S, Fikova R (2017) Methodological framework for assessment and mapping of ecosystem condition and ecosystem services in Bulgaria. Conceptual basis and principles of application. Clorind, Sofia, 48 pp.
  • Burkhard B, Maes J [Eds] (2017) Mapping Ecosystem Services. Pensoft Publishers. https://doi.org/10.3897/ab.e12837
  • Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, Müller F (2012) Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators 21: 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019
  • Burkhard B, Crossman N, Nedkov S, Petz K, Alkemade R (2013) Mapping and modelling ecosystem services for science, policy and practice. Ecosystem Services 4: 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.04.005
  • Burkhard B, Maes J, Potschin-Young M, Santos-Martín F, Geneletti D, Stoev P, Kopperoinen L, Adamescu C, Adem Esmail B, Arany I, Arnell A, Balzan M, Barton DN, Van Beukering P, Bicking S, Borges P, Borisova B, Braat L, M Brander L, Bratanova-Doncheva S, Broekx S, Brown C, Cazacu C, Crossman N, Czúcz B, Daněk J, Groot R, Depellegrin D, Dimopoulos P, Elvinger N, Erhard M, Fagerholm N, Frélichová J, Grêt-Regamey A, Grudova M, Haines-Young R, Inghe O, Kallay T, Kirin T, Klug H, Kokkoris I, Konovska I, Kruse M, Kuzmova I, Lange M, Liekens I, Lotan A, Lowicki D, Luque S, Marta-Pedroso C, Mizgajski A, Mononen L, Mulder S, Müller F, Nedkov S, Nikolova M, Östergård H, Penev L, Pereira P, Pitkänen K, Plieninger T, Rabe S-E, Reichel S, Roche P, Rusch G, Ruskule A, Sapundzhieva A, Sepp K, Sieber I, Šmid Hribar M, Stašová S, Steinhoff-Knopp B, Stępniewska M, Teller A, Vackar D, van Weelden M, Veidemane K, Vejre H, Vihervaara P, Viinikka A, Villoslada M, Weibel B, Zulian G (2018a) Mapping and assessing ecosystem services in the EU - Lessons learned from the ESMERALDA approach of integration. One Ecosystem 3: e29153. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e29153
  • Burkhard B, Santos-Martin F, Nedkov S, Maes J (2018b) An operational framework for integrated Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services (MAES). One Ecosystem 3: e22831. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e22831
  • Campagne CS, Roche P, Müller F, Burkhard B (2020) Ten years of ecosystem services matrix: Review of a (r)evolution. One Ecosystem 5: e51103. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.5.e51103
  • Costanza R, d'Arge R, De Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O'Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, Van Den Belt M (1997) The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387(6630): 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0
  • Crossman ND, Burkhard B, Nedkov S, Willemen L, Petz K, Palomo I, Drakou EG, Martín-Lopez B, McPhearson T, Boyanova K, Alkemade R, Egoh B, Dunbar MB, Maes J (2013) A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services 4: 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.001
  • Daily GC (1997) Nature's Services Societal Dependence On Natural Ecosystems. Island Press, Washington DC, 1–392.
  • Danova K (2023) International Seminar of Ecology – 2022. In: Chankova S, Danova K, Beltcheva M, Radeva G, Petrova V, Vassilev K (Eds) Actual problems of Ecology. BioRisk 20: 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3897/biorisk.20.104660
  • De Groot RS (1992) Functions of nature: Evaluation of nature in environmental planning, management and decision making. Wolters-Noordhoff, Amsterdam, 296 pp.
  • Egoh B, Drakou E, Dunbar M, Maes J, Willemen L (2012) Indicators for mapping ecosystem services: A review. EUR 25456 EN. Luxembourg (Luxembourg). Publications Office of the European Union. JRC73016. https://doi.org/10.2788/41823
  • Förster J, Schmidt S, Bartkowski B, Lienhoop N, Albert C, Wittmer H (2019) Incorporating environmental costs of ecosystem service loss in political decision making: A synthesis of monetary values for Germany. PLoS ONE 14: e0211419. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211419
  • Frélichová J, Vačkář D, Pártl A, Loučková B, Harmáčková ZV, Lorencová E (2014) Integrated assessment of ecosystem services in the Czech Republic. Ecosystem Services 8: 110–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.03.001
  • Geneletti D, Adem Esmail B, Cortinovis C, Arany I, Balzan M, Van Beukering P, Bicking S, Borges P, Borisova B, Broekx S, Burkhard B, Gil A, Inghe O, Kopperoinen L, Kruse M, Liekens I, Lowicki D, Mizgajski A, Mulder S, Nedkov S, Ostergard H, Picanço A, Ruskule A, Santos-Martín F, Sieber IM, Svensson J, Vačkářů D, Veidemane K (2020) Ecosystem services mapping and assessment for policy- and decision-making: Lessons learned from a comparative analysis of European case studies. One Ecosystem 5: e53111. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.5.e53111
  • Grigorov B, Velev N, Assenov A, Nazarov M, Genova B, Vassilev K (2022) Forests of Breznik municipality. In: Chankova S, Peneva V, Metcheva R, Beltcheva M, Vassilev K, Radeva G, Danova K (Eds) Current trends of ecology. BioRisk 17: 367–377. https://doi.org/10.3897/biorisk.17.77388
  • Haase D, Larondelle N, Andersson E, Artmann M, Borgström S, Breuste J, Gomez-Baggethun E, Gren Å, Hamstead Z, Hansen R, Kabisch N, Kremer P, Langemeyer J, Rall EL, McPhearson T, Pauleit S, Qureshi S, Schwarz N, Voigt A, Wurster D, Elmqvist T (2014) A Quantitative Review of Urban Ecosystem Service Assessments: Concepts, Models, and Implementation. Ambio 43(4): 413–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0504-0
  • Haines-Young R, Potschin MB (2018) Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V5.1 and Guidance on the Application of the Revised Structure. One Ecosystem 3: e27108. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e27108
  • Hristova D, Stoycheva V (2021) Mapping of ecosystems in Bulgaria for the needs of natural heritage assessment. Journal of the Bulgarian Geographical Society 45: 89–98. https://doi.org/10.3897/jbgs.e76457
  • Karamfilov V, Berov D, Pehlivanov L, Nedkov S, Vassilev V, Bratanova-Doncheva S, Chipev N, Gocheva K (2017) Methodology for assessment and mapping of marine ecosystems condition and their services in Bulgaria. Clorind, Sofia, 66 pp.
  • Kostov G, Rafailova E, Bratanova-Doncheva S, Gocheva K, Chipev N (2017) Methodology for assessment and mapping of woodland and forests ecosystems condition and their services in Bulgaria. Clorind, Sofia, 84 pp.
  • Luederitz C, Brink E, Gralla F, Hermelingmeier V, Meyer M, Niven L, Panzer L, Partelow S, Rau A-L, Sasaki R, Abson DJ, Lang DJ, Wamsler C, Von Wehrden H (2015) A review of urban ecosystem services: Six key challenges for future research. Ecosystem Services 14: 98–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.05.001
  • Maes J, Teller A, Erhard M et al. (2013) Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services. An analytical framework for ecosystem assessments under action 5 of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. 1st MAES report. Publications office of the European Union, Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2779/12398
  • Malinga R, Gordon LJ, Jewitt G, Lindborg R (2015) Mapping ecosystem services across scales and continents – A review. Ecosystem Services 13: 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.01.006
  • Martin-Ortega J, Mesa-Jurado MA, Pineda-Vazquez M, Novo P (2019) Nature commodification: 'a necessary evil'? An analysis of the views of environmental professionals on ecosystem services-based approaches. Ecosystem Services 37: 100926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100926
  • Martínez-Harms MJ, Balvanera P (2012) Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: A review. The International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management 8(1–2): 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2012.663792
  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: A Framework for Assessment. Island Press, Washington, D.C., 212 pp.
  • Nedkov S (2008) Regulation function of ecosystem services in small watershed floods. "Geography and Regional Development" Conference, Sozopol (Bulgaria), 29 September 2008. LOPS, Sofia.
  • Nedkov S (2018) GIS tools and models for mapping and assessment of ecosystem services. Journal of the Bulgarian Geographical Society 39: 17–24. https://doi.org/10.3897/jbgs.2018.39.3
  • Nedkov S, Burkhard B (2012) Flood regulating ecosystem services—Mapping supply and demand, in the Etropole municipality, Bulgaria. Ecological Indicators 21: 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.022
  • Nedkov S, Zhiyanski M, Dimitrov S, Borisova B, Popov A, Ihtimanski I, Yaneva R, Nikolov P, Bratanova-Doncheva S (2017) Mapping and assessment of urban ecosystem condition and services using integrated index of spatial structure. One Ecosystem 2: e14499. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.2.e14499
  • Nedkov S, Zhiyanski M, Borisova B, Bratanova-Doncheva S (2018) Mapping and assessment of ecosystem condition and ecosystem services across different scales and domains in Europe. One Ecosystem 3: e29288. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e29288
  • Nedkov S, Zhelezov G, Ilieva N, Nikolova M, Koulov B, Naydenov K, Dimitrov S [Eds] (2020) Smart Geography: 100 Years of the Bulgarian Geographical Society. Springer International Publishing, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28191-5
  • Nedkov S, Borisova B, Nikolova M, Zhiyanski M, Dimitrov S, Mitova R, Koulov B, Hristova D, Prodanova H, Semerdzhieva L, Dodev Y, Ihtimanski I, Stoyanova V (2021) A methodological framework for mapping and assessment of ecosystem services provided by the natural heritage in Bulgaria. Journal of the Bulgarian Geographical Society 45: 7–18. https://doi.org/10.3897/jbgs.e78680
  • Nedkov S, Campagne S, Borisova B, Krpec P, Prodanova H, Kokkoris IP, Hristova D, Le Clec'h S, Santos-Martin F, Burkhard B, Bekri ES, Stoycheva V, Bruzón AG, Dimopoulos P (2022) Modeling water regulation ecosystem services: A review in the context of ecosystem accounting. Ecosystem Services 56: 101458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101458
  • Nikolov P, Hristova D, Stoycheva V (2022) Modeling of flood regulation for ecosystem accounting: A case study of Ogosta river basin. Journal of the Bulgarian Geographical Society 46: 3–10. https://doi.org/10.3897/jbgs.e86288
  • Nikolova M, Nedkov S, Borisova B, Zhiyanski M, Dimitrov S (2021a) Natural heritage as a source of ecosystem services for recreation and tourism in Bulgaria. Journal of the Bulgarian Geographical Society 45: 3–6. https://doi.org/10.3897/jbgs.e79485
  • Nikolova M, Nojarov P, Nedkov S (2021b) National natural heritage at risk: The Seven Rila Lakes. Journal of the Bulgarian Geographical Society 45: 67–80. https://doi.org/10.3897/jbgs.e78709
  • Nikolova M, Stoyanova V, Varadzhakova D, Ravnachka A (2021c) Cultural ecosystem services for development of nature-based tourism in Bulgaria. Journal of the Bulgarian Geographical Society 45: 81–87. https://doi.org/10.3897/jbgs.e78719
  • Peng Y, Welden N, Renaud FG (2023) A framework for integrating ecosystem services indicators into vulnerability and risk assessments of deltaic social-ecological systems. Journal of Environmental Management 326: 116682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116682
  • Petkova G, Prodanova H, Stoycheva V (2022) Analysis of the national ecosystem database of Bulgaria: (Mis)matches with the MAES framework. Journal of the Bulgarian Geographical Society 47: 73–82. https://doi.org/10.3897/jbgs.e99268
  • Prodanova H (2021) Experimental mapping and assessment of ecosystem services based on multi-level landscape classification. Journal of the Bulgarian Geographical Society 45: 31–39. https://doi.org/10.3897/jbgs.e78692
  • Prodanova H, Varadzhakova D (2022) How individual scores affect the final expert-based assessments of ecosystem services: Range and mean scores analysis of natural heritage supply maps. European Journal of Geography 13(4): 74–97. https://doi.org/10.48088/ejg.h.pro.13.4.074.097
  • Schägner JP, Brander L, Maes J, Hartje V (2013) Mapping ecosystem services' values: Current practice and future prospects. Ecosystem Services 4: 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.003
  • Semerdzhieva L, Borisova B (2021) Urban ecosystems assessment: An integrated approach to maintenance of habitats and their biodiversity. Journal of the Bulgarian Geographical Society 45: 99–106. https://doi.org/10.3897/jbgs.e78975
  • Seppelt R, Dormann CF, Eppink FV, Lautenbach S, Schmidt S (2011) A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead: Priorities for ecosystem service studies. Journal of Applied Ecology 48(3): 630–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01952.x
  • Silvestriev M, Borisova B, Mitova R (2021) Natural heritage: Provision of cultural ecosystem services from the Malyovitsa Range of the Rila National Park. Journal of the Bulgarian Geographical Society 45: 41–59. https://doi.org/10.3897/jbgs.e72500
  • Sing L, Metzger MJ, Paterson JS, Ray D (2018) A review of the effects of forest management intensity on ecosystem services for northern European temperate forests with a focus on the UK. Forestry. Forestry 91(2): 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpx042
  • Stoycheva V, Geneletti D (2023) A review of regulating ecosystem services in the context of urban planning. Journal of the Bulgarian Geographical Society 48: 27–42. https://doi.org/10.3897/jbgs.e93499
  • Uzunov Y, Pehlivanov L, Karamfilov V, Berov D, Clein S, Keremedchiev S, Velkova D, Kirilova Y, Vasilev V, Tsvetkova N, Stoeva L (2017) Freshwater and marine ecosystems: Status, Services, Perspectives. Club Ekonomica Publ., Sofia, 45 pp. https://www.resac-bg.org/images/docs/news/2017_07_Scientific_Study_FEMA-MARINE.pdf
  • Vári Á, Tanács E, Tormáné Kovács E, Kalóczkai Á, Arany I, Czúcz B, Bereczki K, Belényesi M, Csákvári E, Kiss M, Fabók V, Kisné Fodor L, Koncz P, Lehoczki R, Pásztor L, Pataki R, Rezneki R, Szerényi Z, Török K, Zölei A, Zsembery Z, Kovács-Hostyánszki A (2022) National Ecosystem Services Assessment in Hungary: Framework, Process and Conceptual Questions. Sustainability 14(19): 12847. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912847
  • Vári Á, Adamescu CM, Balzan M, Gocheva K, Götzl M, Grunewald K, Inácio M, Linder M, Obiang-Ndong G, Pereira P, Santos-Martin F, Sieber I, Stępniewska M, Tanács E, Termansen M, Tromeur E, Vačkářová D, Czúcz B (2024) National mapping and assessment of ecosystem services projects in Europe – Participants' experiences, state of the art and lessons learned. Ecosystem Services 65: 101592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2023.101592
  • Vihervaara P, Viinikka A, Brander L, Santos-Martín F, Poikolainen L, Nedkov S (2019) Methodological interlinkages for mapping ecosystem services – from data to analysis and decision-support. One Ecosystem 4: e26368. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.4.e26368
  • Wolff S, Schulp CJE, Verburg PH (2015) Mapping ecosystem services demand: A review of current research and future perspectives. Ecological Indicators 55: 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.016
  • Zevurdakis M, Rashev B, Germer C (2007) Review of the ecosystem services and the values they provide. Rhodope project, UNDP.
  • Zhang Y, Rafailova E, Hussain A (2013) Ecosystem services payment and non-market valuation: Implications for Bulgarian private forest management. Forestry Ideas 19(1): 49–57. https://forestry-ideas.info/
  • Zhiyanski M, Glushkova M, Dodev Y, Bozhilova M, Yaneva R, Hristova D, Semerdzhieva L (2021) Role of the cultural ecosystem services provided by natural heritage in forest territories for sustainable regional development. Journal of the Bulgarian Geographical Society 45: 61–66. https://doi.org/10.3897/jbgs.e72766