Published March 21, 2018 | Version v1
Journal article Open

ISSUES IN MALAYALAM TEXT SUMMARIZATION

Creators

  • 1. Department of Linguistics, University of Kerala, Kariyavattom, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala
  • 2. Department of Computer Science, University of Kerala, Kariyavattom, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala

Description

Text Summarization is the process of creates an abridged version of the original text and it covers overall idea about the document. The human summarization requires lot of time and effort. At the same time summarization system produce summary within a short span of time. It generates summaries or abstracts of large documents. Many techniques have been developed for summarization of text in various languages.  The techniques may be language dependent or independent.  Some techniques may be varies from its discourse structure. The summarization methods can be classified as extractive and abstractive. The abstractive method requires language processing tools. The extractive summarization depends on statistical and linguistic tools. This paper mainly concentrated some of the issues faced by the Malayalam text summarization. The Malayalam summarization faces some difficulties for creating a fruitful summary.

Files

184.pdf

Files (364.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:bf93f96c5976eb65ecac9ea57a57dde4
364.8 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • 1. Luhn, (1958). The automatic creation of literature abstracts. IBM Journal of Research Development, 2(2):159–165. 2. Baxendale, P. B. (1958). 'Machine-made index for technical literature: an experiment'. IBM Journal, 354–361. 3. Landauer, T. K. & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of the acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211-240. 4. E. Hovy and C-Y Lin. (1997). Automated Text Summarization in SUMMARIST. in Proceedings of the Workshop of Intelligent Scalable Text Summarization, July. 5. Barzilay, R., & Elhadad, M. (1997). Using lexical chains for text summarization. In Proceedings of the ACL'97/EACL'97 workshop on intelligent scalable text summarization (pp. 10–17), Madrid, Spain. 6. Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Laham, D. (1998). Introduction to Latent Semantic Analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 259-284. 7. Hovy, E.H. and Lin, C.Y. (1999). Automated Text Summarization in SUMMARIST. In I. Mani and M. Maybury (eds), Advances in Automated Text Summarization. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 81–94 8. Mani, I & Maybury, M. T. (Eds.). (1999). Advances in automated text summarization. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 9. Hahn.U, and Mani.I. (2000).The challenges of automatic summarization. Computer 33: 29-36. 10. Gong.Y., and Liu.X. (2001). Generic text summarization using relevance measure and latent semantic analysis. In Proceedings of ACM SIGIR. New Orleans, USA. 11. Steinberger, J. and Jezek, K. (2004). Using Latent Semantic Analysis in Text Summarization and Summary Evaluation. Proceedings of ISIM '04, pages 93-100. 12. Das.D., and Martins.A.F.T. (2007). A Survey on Automatic Text Summarization. Literature survey for Language and Statistics II, Carnegie Mellon University. 13. Gupta,V., and Lehal.G.S. (2010). A Survey of Text Summarization Extractive Techniques. Journal Of Emerging Technologies In Web Intelligence, VOL. 2, NO. 3. 14. En.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malayalam