Published October 30, 2023 | Version v1
Journal article Open

A Hospital Based Randomized Comparative Assessment of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy under Spinal Anaesthesia vs General Anaesthesia

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Senior Resident, Department of Anaesthesia, Shri Krishna Medical College, Muzaffarpur, Bihar

Description

Abstract
Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety and advantages of conducting LC under
SA in comparison to GA.
Methods: The study was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesia for 8 months . Informed consent was
obtained from all the patients who had agreed to participate in the study. A detailed explanation of the procedure
and risks involved was given. A total number of 70 patients were included in the study.
Results: Both the groups had similar demographic profile. In the SA group, 45 patients were females and 25
patients were males. The mean age was 46 ±12.68 years and 48.82 ±10.45 in SA and GA groups respectively.
The duration of surgery was 82.98±21.99 min and 98.2±36.04 min in the GA and SA groups which was not
statistically significant. For each procedure the surgeon was asked to give a score of 1-3, regarding the surgical
conditions and muscle relaxation; 1 was bad, 2 good and 3 being excellent. In the SA group, 8 patients
complained of shoulder pain, 3 patients required conversion to GA as the pain did not subside with Fentanyl and
they were excluded from further analysis. All the patients (100%) in the GA group had pain at operated site
immediately after completion of operation and their pain score ranged from 4-7, all patients received rescue
analgesic before shifting to the ward. In the first 24h tramadol required as rescue in the GA group was 84±26
mg which was significantly higher than the SA group requiring only 31±32.18 mg. Although, the GA group had
more patients experiencing postoperative nausea & vomiting it was not statistically significant.
Conclusion: We concluded that laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be safely performed under spinal anaesthesia
using bupivacaine and clonidine as an adjuvant. Spinal anaesthesia provides stable intra-operative
haemodynamic and respiratory parameters, requires less postoperative analgesics with extended duration of
analgesia, with no major complications and has better patient satisfaction

Abstract (English)

Abstract
Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety and advantages of conducting LC under
SA in comparison to GA.
Methods: The study was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesia for 8 months . Informed consent was
obtained from all the patients who had agreed to participate in the study. A detailed explanation of the procedure
and risks involved was given. A total number of 70 patients were included in the study.
Results: Both the groups had similar demographic profile. In the SA group, 45 patients were females and 25
patients were males. The mean age was 46 ±12.68 years and 48.82 ±10.45 in SA and GA groups respectively.
The duration of surgery was 82.98±21.99 min and 98.2±36.04 min in the GA and SA groups which was not
statistically significant. For each procedure the surgeon was asked to give a score of 1-3, regarding the surgical
conditions and muscle relaxation; 1 was bad, 2 good and 3 being excellent. In the SA group, 8 patients
complained of shoulder pain, 3 patients required conversion to GA as the pain did not subside with Fentanyl and
they were excluded from further analysis. All the patients (100%) in the GA group had pain at operated site
immediately after completion of operation and their pain score ranged from 4-7, all patients received rescue
analgesic before shifting to the ward. In the first 24h tramadol required as rescue in the GA group was 84±26
mg which was significantly higher than the SA group requiring only 31±32.18 mg. Although, the GA group had
more patients experiencing postoperative nausea & vomiting it was not statistically significant.
Conclusion: We concluded that laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be safely performed under spinal anaesthesia
using bupivacaine and clonidine as an adjuvant. Spinal anaesthesia provides stable intra-operative
haemodynamic and respiratory parameters, requires less postoperative analgesics with extended duration of
analgesia, with no major complications and has better patient satisfaction

Files

IJCPR,Vol15,Issue10,Article49.pdf

Files (331.3 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:b24a16d8f1990e79d8ce3a9c887652cc
331.3 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Dates

Accepted
2023-08-15