Volume difference between Internal Target Volume (ITV) and Deformable Image Registration (DIR_ITV): A comparative analysis
Creators
- 1. Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
- 2. Department of Physics, School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
Description
This study investigates the essential role of Radiation Therapy Quality
Assurance (RTQA) procedures in modern radiotherapy treatments, particularly
focusing on Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for centrally located
lung malignancies. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of three
commonly used metrics DSC (Dice Similarity Coefficient), GMI (Geometric
Miss Index), and DI (Discordance Index) in assessing patients with specify
condition/population. We focus on three key aspects: the Initial Tumor Volume
(ITV) as delineated at 0 of the prescribed dose (ITV_0% P_DIR), 50% of
the prescribed dose (ITV_50% P_DIR), and Maximum Intensity Projection
(ITV_MIP). The analysis reveals significant differences among the metrics
in evaluating tumor characteristics at different dose levels and imaging
perspectives. Notably, DSC provided distinct insights into tumor perfusion
dynamics, particularly evident in the delineation of ITV_0 P_DIR and ITV_50%
P_DIR. GMI exhibited strengths in capturing subtle variations in tumor
morphology, with ITV_0 P_DIR comparisons showing its utility. DI has turned
out to be a valuable tool in delineating spatial heterogeneity, with significant
findings observed between ITV_50% P_DIR and ITV_MIP. These findings
underscore the importance of selecting appropriate metrics tailored to the
specific diagnostic or prognostic objectives in patients with specify condition/
population.
Files
133901-Manuscript-2024-05-20-ds0z.pdf
Files
(989.5 kB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:da1ccfa6126cab7e2781ab4c748c9111
|
989.5 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Identifiers
- ISSN
- 1896-8961
Related works
- Is published in
- Publication: 10.5281/zenodo.11518048 (DOI)