Published May 17, 2024
| Version v1
Journal article
Open
A new case of pedipalp regeneration in Scorpio kruglovi Birula, 1910 (Scorpiones: Scorpionidae)
Authors/Creators
Description
Euscorpius, No. (2024): A new case of pedipalp regeneration in Scorpio kruglovi Birula, 1910 (Scorpiones: Scorpionidae). Euscorpius 390: 1-3, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11449947
Files
source.pdf
Files
(1.2 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:edff816bef7b4bfb0e5f50e19438872e
|
1.2 MB | Preview Download |
Linked records
Additional details
Related works
- Has part
- Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.11449951 (DOI)
References
- BRECKO, J., A. MATHYS, W. DEKONINCK, M. LEPONCE, D. VANDEN SPIEGEL & P. SEMAL. 2014. Focus stacking: Comparing commercial top-end set-ups with a semi-automatic low budget approach. A possible solution for mass digitization of type specimens. ZooKeys, 464: 1-23.
- JAHANIFARD, E., S. NAVIDPOUR & B. MASIHIPOUR. 2008. Pedipalps and venom vesicle anomalies in two families of scorpions (Scorpiones: Hemiscorpiidae, Buthidae) from Iran. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 11: 309-311.
- KURT, R., E. A. YAGMUR & G. CELIK. 2023. First report of regeneration in the genus Mesobuthus (Scorpiones: Buthidae). Euscorpius, 372: 1-s4.
- ROEWER, C. F. 1943. Uber eine neuerworbene Sammlung von Skorpionen des Natur-Museums Senckenberg. Senckenbergiana, 26(4): 205-244.
- ROSIN, R. 1964. On regeneration in scorpions. Israel Journal of Zoology, 13(4): 177-183.
- ROSIN, R. & A. SHULOV. 1963. Studies on the scorpion Nebo hierochonticus. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 140: 547-575.
- SHERWOOD, D. & ARMAS, L. F., de. 2023. On some teratological scorpions in the Natural History Museum, London and checklist of the scorpiological literature on morphological anomalies (Arachnida: Scorpiones). Euscorpius, 381: 1-20.
- STEMME, T. 2023. No evidence for regeneration of pectines in the scorpion Euscorpius italicus (Herbst, 1800). Acta Zoologica, 00: 1-13.
- TALAL, S., I. TESLER, J. SIVAN, R. BEN-SHLOMO, H. TAHIR, L. PRENDINI, S. SNIR & E. GEFEN. 2015. Scorpion speciation in the Holy Land: Multilocus phylogeography corroborates diagnostic differences in morphology and burrowing behavior among Scorpio subspecies and justifies recognition as phylogenetic, ecological and biological species. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 91: 226-237.
- TERUEL, R. 2003. Nuevos casos de anomalias morfologicas en escorpiones (Scorpiones: Bothriuridae, Euscorpiidae, Hemiscorpiidae, Ischnuridae, Iuridae, Buthidae, Chactidae, Chaerilidae, Diplocentridae, Scorpionidae). Revista Iberica de Aracnologia, 7: 235-238.
- VACHON, M. 1953. Sur un cas de schistomelie ternaire d'une patte ambulatoire chez le scorpion fouisseur Scorpio maurus L. Biology Bulletin, 87: 218-225.
- VACHON, M. 1957. La regeneration appendiculaire chez les scorpions (Arachnides). Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des seances de l'Academie des sciences, Paris, 244: 2556-2559.
- WATZ, M. & J. A. DUNLOP. 2022. Observations on regeneration of the pedipalp and legs of scorpions. Euscorpius, 345: 1-5.
- YAGMUR, E. A., M. S. KILIC & O. YILMAZ. 2021. An anomaly of chelicera in Scorpio kruglovi Birula, 1910 (Scorpiones: Scorpionidae). Euscorpius, 335: 1-4.
- ZOUATINE, O., S. BISSATI & S. E. SADINE. 2024. Two cases of malformation in the scorpion genus Androctonus Ehrenberg, 1828 from Central Algeria (Scorpiones: Buthidae). Serket, 20(2): 125-130.