Published September 30, 2023 | Version https://impactfactor.org/PDF/IJPCR/15/IJPCR,Vol15,Issue9,Article137.pdf
Journal article Open

An Analysis of Treatment Outcome in Traumatic Intracranial Bleed with Midline Shift of More Than 5mm: A Tertiary Level Health Care Center Based Study

  • 1. Senior Resident, Department of General Surgery, Shri Ram Murti Smarak Institute of Medical Sciences, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • 2. Assistant Professor Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Shri Ram Murti Smarak Institute of Medical Sciences, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India

Description

Background: Traumatic intracranial bleed is an acute event with a pathophysiology that is dynamic. It has the potential of inducing progressive neurological deterioration either because of its continued expansion over initial few hours or subsequently by the combined effect of hematoma and edema. The hematoma and edema induced mass effect leads to midline shift (MLS) that may cause secondary damage to the delicately balanced architecture of brain between the two hemispheres, thus aggravating the neurological deficits or may even threaten the life. Influenced by a multitude of factors, the treatment and its outcome varies across centers. This signifies the need to identify factors that might possibly be modified to deliver a favorable outcome or prognosticate the patient in concern. Among the factors having bearing on the decision of medical or surgical treatment, midline shift and Glasgow Coma scale score (GCS) are the most important ones and inversely related among themselves. We conducted a prospective study to assess their impact in need of surgery and outcome of treatment on a short-term basis. Objectives: In patients of head injury having acute intracranial bleed and producing mass effect and midline shift of more than 5mm – to determine (1). The percentage of patients requiring surgery. (2). To determine the incidence of mortality. (3). To evaluate the functional recovery at 6 months post trauma  Methods: 61 patients with traumatic intracranial bleed and MLS of 5mm or more were enrolled over a period of 3 years. Medical or surgical treatment as justified by clinico radiological parameters and standard guidelines were given. Analysis was carried out with the objectives of identifying -the need of surgery in study subjects, mortality and functional outcome at 6 months post injury. Results: 60% patient were less than 40 years of age.  50.8% patients were admitted with severe head injury (GCS<8). 73.8% patients (45/61) had a MLS between 5-10mm.  41 out of 61(66.7%) patients were treated by surgery. Overall, mortality was 37.7% (23/61). Of those who survived, 56.5% were functionally independent for activities of daily living at 6 months follow-up. Conclusions: Traumatic intracranial bleed associated mass effect and midline shift is associated with high mortality. Treatment benefit rapidly declines with increasing mass effect. Only half of the survivors achieve functional independence for activities of daily living at 6 months post trauma

 

 

Abstract (English)

Background: Traumatic intracranial bleed is an acute event with a pathophysiology that is dynamic. It has the potential of inducing progressive neurological deterioration either because of its continued expansion over initial few hours or subsequently by the combined effect of hematoma and edema. The hematoma and edema induced mass effect leads to midline shift (MLS) that may cause secondary damage to the delicately balanced architecture of brain between the two hemispheres, thus aggravating the neurological deficits or may even threaten the life. Influenced by a multitude of factors, the treatment and its outcome varies across centers. This signifies the need to identify factors that might possibly be modified to deliver a favorable outcome or prognosticate the patient in concern. Among the factors having bearing on the decision of medical or surgical treatment, midline shift and Glasgow Coma scale score (GCS) are the most important ones and inversely related among themselves. We conducted a prospective study to assess their impact in need of surgery and outcome of treatment on a short-term basis. Objectives: In patients of head injury having acute intracranial bleed and producing mass effect and midline shift of more than 5mm – to determine (1). The percentage of patients requiring surgery. (2). To determine the incidence of mortality. (3). To evaluate the functional recovery at 6 months post trauma  Methods: 61 patients with traumatic intracranial bleed and MLS of 5mm or more were enrolled over a period of 3 years. Medical or surgical treatment as justified by clinico radiological parameters and standard guidelines were given. Analysis was carried out with the objectives of identifying -the need of surgery in study subjects, mortality and functional outcome at 6 months post injury. Results: 60% patient were less than 40 years of age.  50.8% patients were admitted with severe head injury (GCS<8). 73.8% patients (45/61) had a MLS between 5-10mm.  41 out of 61(66.7%) patients were treated by surgery. Overall, mortality was 37.7% (23/61). Of those who survived, 56.5% were functionally independent for activities of daily living at 6 months follow-up. Conclusions: Traumatic intracranial bleed associated mass effect and midline shift is associated with high mortality. Treatment benefit rapidly declines with increasing mass effect. Only half of the survivors achieve functional independence for activities of daily living at 6 months post trauma

 

 

Files

IJPCR,Vol15,Issue9,Article137.pdf

Files (307.4 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:e7b9aaa590571851a5980096ca671183
307.4 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Dates

Accepted
2023-08-29

References

  • 1. Georges A, M Das J. Traumatic Brain Injury. [Updated 2023 Jan 2]. In: Stat Pearls [Internet]. Treasure Island(FL): Stat Pearls Publishing; 2023 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459 300/ 2. Hsiang, John N K. High-risk mild head injury. Journal of long-term effects of medical implants. 2005;15(2): 153-9. 3. Clifton GL, Grossman RG, Makela ME, Miner ME, Handel S, Sadhu V. Neurological course and correlated computerized tomography findings after severe closed head injury. J Neurosurg 1980;52:611-24. 4. Keith B. Quattrocchi, Praveen Prasad, Neil H. Willits, Franklin C. Wagner Jr.Quantification of midline shift as a predictor of poor outcome following head injury: Surgical Neurology,1991; 35(3): 183-188. 5. Yang DB, Yu WH, Dong XQ, Du Q, Shen YF, Zhang ZY, Zhu Q, Che ZH, Liu QJ, Wang H, Jiang L. Plasma copeptin level predicts acute traumatic coagulopathy and progressive hemorrhagic injury after traumatic brain injury. Peptides. 2014 Aug 1;58:26-9. 6. Ropper AH. Lateral displacement of the brain and level of consciousness in patients with an acute hemispheral mass. New England Journal of Medicine. 1986 Apr 10;314(15):953-8.7. Nelson LD, Temkin NR, Barber J, et al. Functional Recovery, Symptoms, and Quality of Life 1 to 5 Years After Traumatic Brain Injury: Findings From the TRACK-TBI Study. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(3):e233660. 8. Bullock MR, Chesnut R, Ghajar J, Gordon D, Hartl R, Newell DW, Servadei F, Walters BC, Wilberger JE; Surgical Management of Traumatic Brain Injury Author Group. Surgical management of acute subdural hematomas. Neurosurgery. 2006 Mar;58(3 Suppl):S16-24; discussion Si-iv. 9. Deepak Agrawal, S Ahmed, S. Khan, D. Gupta, and G D Satyarthee. Outcome in 2068 patients of head injury: Experience at Level 1 trauma centre in India. Asian J Neurosurg. 2016 Apr-Jun; 11(2): 143-145. 10. Kagan RJ, Baker RJ. The impact of the volume of neurotrauma experience on mortality after head injury. Am Surg. 1994;60:394–400. 11. Lu J, Roe C, Sigurdardottir S, Andelic N, Forslund M. Trajectory of Functional Independent Measurements during First Five Years after Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. J Neurotrauma. 2018 Jul 15;35(14):1596-1603.