Published December 31, 2005 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Neodon Horsfield 1841

Description

Neodon Horsfield 1841

Neodon Horsfield 1841, A Catalogue of the Mammalia in the Museum of the Hon. East-India Company: 145-146 (as corrected by Kaneko and Smeenk, 1996; not Hodgson, 1849, as entrenched in the literature).

Type Species: Neodon sikimensis Horsfield 1841

Synonyms: Bicunedens Hodgson 1863.

Species and subspecies: 4 species:

Species Neodon forresti Hinton 1923

Species Neodon irene Thomas 1911

Species Neodon juldaschi Severtzov 1879

Species Neodon sikimensis Horsfield 1841

Discussion: Arvicolini. Included in Pitymyini by Repenning et al. (1990) and Repenning (1992). Maintained as a genus by some specialists (Ellerman, 1941; Hinton, 1923, 1926 a; Zagorodnyuk, 1990, 1992 c), as a subgenus of Pitymys by others (Corbet, 1978 c; Ellerman, 1941; Ellerman and Morrison-Scott, 1951), or a subgenus of Microtus (G. M. Allen, 1940; Gromov and Erjabeva, 1995; Gromov and Polyakov, 1977; Musser and Carleton, 1993; Pavlinov et al., 1995 a). Hinton (1923, 1926 a) enumerated cranial traits that characterize Neodon and considered it to be closely related to Pitymys, primarily based on the m1 occlusal pattern; species of Nearctic Pitymys and Palearctic Terricola (here treated as subgenera of Microtus) and Neodon sikimensis all possess this pitymyine m1 configuration (as defined by Repenning, 1992:65). Both N. sikimensis and pitymyine forms also have an elongate and complex M3, generally with four lingual salient angles in contrast to the simpler pattern seen in Phaiomys leucurus (see Hinton, 1923, 1926 a; Nadachowski and Zagorodnyuk, 1996; Repenning, 1992). Hinton (1923) included forresti, irene, oniscus (= irene), and carruthersi (= juldaschi) in Neodon. Occlusal patterns of their m1s vary, some similar to the pattern in N. sikimensis, others less complex and generally, but not in detail, resembling the Allophaiomys like configuration as seen in Blanfordimys and Phaiomys (specimens in AMNH, FMNH, and USNM; also see Nadachowski and Zagorodnyuk, 1996). All have a more elaborate M3 than that in Phaiomys leucurus, and none possesses the deep and stout cranium like that species or its short, constricted incisive foramina (see account of P. leucurus).

Species of Neodon (along with Blanfordimys and Phaiomys) are characterized as Pleistocene relicts because their molar occlusal patterns resemble the extinct Allophaiomys. Further, one species (N. juldaschi) has a primitive karyotype similar to that hypothesized as ancestral to Arvicolini (2n = 56, Chaline and Matthey, 1971; or 2n = 54, Zagorodnyuk, 1992 c). Thus, Nadachowski and Zagorodnyuk (1996:387) viewed these voles as " Allophaiomys like" species that represent "Pleistocene relicts or a return to an initial type," with ranges in C and S Asia at the austral periphery of the Palearctic arvicoline distribution. We provisionally retain Neodon as a lineage independent of Phaiomys and Microtus until phylogenetic relationships can be analyzed by a suite of information bases, including morphological traits other than molar patterns.

Notes

Published as part of Wilson, Don E. & Reeder, DeeAnn, 2005, Order Rodentia - Family Cricetidae, pp. 955-1189 in Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 2, Baltimore :The Johns Hopkins University Press on page 1030, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7316535

Files

Files (3.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:ed398ee4a88aa0048a8c459d104617a4
3.8 kB Download

System files (25.2 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:e25fb91bd54f879142a4b98a028908a2
25.2 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Scientific name authorship
Horsfield
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
Chordata
Order
Rodentia
Family
Cricetidae
Genus
Neodon
Taxon rank
genus
Taxonomic concept label
Neodon Horsfield, 1841 sec. Wilson & Reeder, 2005

References

  • Kaneko, Y., and C. Smeenk. 1996. The author and date of publication of the Sikkim vole Microtus sikimensis. Mammal Study, 21 (2): 161 - 164.
  • Hinton, M. A. C. 1923. On the voles collected by Mr. G. Forrest in Yunnan; with remarks upon the genera Eothenomys and Neodon and upon their allies. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, ser. 9, 11: 145 - 162.
  • Repenning, C. A., O. Fejfar, and W. - D. Heinrich. 1990. Arvicolid rodent biochronology of the Northern Hemisphere. Pp. 385 - 417, in International symposium evolution, phylogeny and biostratigraphy of arvicolids (Rodentia, Mammalia) (O. Fejfar and W. - D. Heinrich, eds.). Geological Survey, Prague, 448 pp.
  • Repenning, C. A. 1992. Allophaiomys and the age of the Olyor Suite, Krestovka Sections, Yakutia. U. S. Geological Survey Bulletin 2037, 98 pp.
  • Ellerman, J. R. 1941. The families and genera of living rodents. Vol. II. Family Muridae. British Museum (Natural History), London, 690 pp.
  • Hinton, M. A. C. 1926 a. Monograph of the voles and lemmings (Microtinae) living and extinct. Volume 1. British Museum (Natural History), London, 488 pp.
  • Zagorodnyuk, I. V. 1990. Kariotipicheskaya izmenchivost' i sistematika serykh polevok (Rodentia, Arvicolini). Soobshchenie 1. Vidovoi sostav i khromosomnye chisla [Karyotypic variability and systematics of the gray voles (Rodentia, Arvicolini). Communication 1. Species composition and chromosomal numbers]. Vestnik Zoologii, 2: 26 - 37 (in Russian).
  • Zagorodnyuk, I. V. 1992 c. [Karyotypic variability and systematics of the Arvicolini (Rodentia). Communication 2. Correlation pattern of chromosomal numbers.] Vestnik Zoologi, 1992 (5): 36 - 45 (in Russian with English abstract).
  • Corbet, G. B. 1978 c. The mammals of the Palaearctic region: A taxonomic review. British Museum (Natural History), London, 314 pp.
  • Ellerman, J. R., and T. C. S. Morrison-Scott. 1951. Checklist of Palaearctic and Indian mammals 1758 to 1946. Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History), London, 810 pp.
  • Gromov, I. M., and I. Ya. Polyakov. 1977. Fauna SSSR, Mlekopitayushchie, tom 3, vyp. 8 [Fauna of the USSR, vol. 3, pt. 8, Mammals]. Polevki [Voles (Microtinae)]. Nauka, Moscow-Leningrad, 504 pp. (in Russian).
  • Musser, G. G., and M. D. Carleton. 1993. Family Muridae. Pp. 501 - 755, in: Mammal species of the world, a taxonomic and geographic reference, Second ed. (D. E. Wilson and D. M. Reeder, eds.). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D. C., xviii + 1206 pp.
  • Pavlinov, I. Ya, E. L. Yakhontov, and A. K. Agadzhanyan. 1995 a. [Mammals of Eurasia. I. Rodentia. Taxonomic and geographic guide.] Archives of the Zoological Museum, Moscow State University, 32: 289 pp. (in Russian).
  • Nadachowski, A., and I. Zagorodnyuk. 1996. Recent Allophaiomys-like species in the Palaearctic: Pleistocene relicts or a return to an initial type. Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia, 39 (1): 387 - 394.
  • Chaline, J., and R. Matthey. 1971. Hypotheses relatives a la formule chromosomique d'Allophaiomys pliocaenicus (Rodentia, Arvicolidae) et a la diversification de cette espece. Comptes Rendus de l'Academie des Sciences, Paris, ser. D, 272 (8): 1071 - 1074.