Published February 13, 2024 | Version 1
Journal article Open

Humanising research on migration decision-making: a situated framework

  • 1. Laboratory of Anthropology of Contemporary Worlds (LAMC), Institute of Sociology, Faculty of Philosophy and Social Sciences, Universite libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, B-1050, Belgium

Description

The question of why some people (re)migrate while others choose to stay remains one of the important preoccupations in migration studies. It underlines the need to further conceptualise transnational migration to identify the drivers behind individuals' aspiration or intention to (re)migrate or stay where they are. Drawing from several migration theories and perspectives in various disciplines, this paper proposes the situated framework of "humanising research on migration decision-making", that is, highlighting its human aspects. This scholarly enterprise is critically important as mainstream migration theories put more emphasis on individuals' rationality and some life dimensions, thereby overlooking other human aspects of migration and stasis. Viewing individuals as persons, this framework offers three ways to humanise the analysis: thick contextualisation, life dimensions-focused analysis, and time-situated inquiry. It also calls for the engendering of the analysis and decolonising the methodologies adopted in the study of (non-)migration decision-making.

This paper proposes an analytical framework to address the question of what drives people to migrate, remigrate, or stay where they are. To do so, it draws from existing migration theories in different disciplines and situates itself within the vast literature theorising migration. The resulting framework focuses on (non-)migration decision-making, specifically the drivers of migration aspiration and intention. It views individuals as persons with internal processes in cognitive, emotional, and relational terms; subjectivity; agency; social world; and lived experiences. This humanising framework not only calls for engendering research on (non-)migration decision-making but also suggests several decolonising data-gathering techniques. It offers three analytical ways: thick contextualisation, life dimensions-focused analysis, and time-situated inquiry. Its humanising approach to individual (non-)migration decision-making is a response to several calls to make scientific inquiries more humane, inclusive, and grounded.

Files

openreseurope-3-18656.pdf

Files (2.1 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:124915e8e98a2f6432ee583cc974b4cb
2.1 MB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Achenbach R (2017). Return migration decisions: A study on highly skilled Chinese in Japan. doi:10.1007/978-3-658-16027-2
  • Agamben G (1998). Homo sacer, Sovereign power and bare life.
  • Asis MM, Ruiz-Marave C (2013). Leaving a legacy: parental migration and school outcomes among young children in the Philippines. Asian Pac Migr J. doi:10.1177/011719681302200303
  • Baldassar L, Merla L (2014). Transnational families, migration and the circulation of care. Understanding mobility and absence in family life.
  • Bartlett R, Milligan C (2021). Diary method. Research methods.
  • Bergold J, Thomas S (2012). Participatory research methods: A methodological approach in mo-tion. Hist Soc Re/Histo Soz. doi:10.2307/41756482
  • Bhatia S (2020). Decolonizing psychology: Power, citizenship and identity. Psycho Self Cont. doi:10.1080/24720038.2020.1772266
  • Bloor M, Frankland J, Thomas M (2001). Focus groups in social research. doi:10.4135/9781849209175
  • Boccagni P, Baldassar L (2015). Emotions on the move: Mapping the emergent field of emotion and migration. Emot Space Soc. doi:10.1016/j.emospa.2015.06.009
  • Bonizzoni P, Fresnoza-Flot A (2023). Membership intermediaries: a study of pluri-generational mixed-status families in Italy and France. Comp Migr Stud. doi:10.1186/s40878-023-00337-0
  • Bourdieu P (1986). The forms of capital.
  • Boyd M (1989). Family and personal networks in international migration: Recent developments and new agendas. Int Migr Rev. doi:10.1177/019791838902300313
  • Brettell CB (2000). Theorizing migration in anthropology: The social construction of networks, identities, communities, and globalscapes.
  • Brettell CB, Hollifield JF (2023). Migration theory. Talking across disciplines.
  • Bryceson DF, Vuorela U (2002). The transnational family. New European frontiers and global networks.
  • Butler J (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity.
  • Carling J (2002). Migration in the age of involuntary immobility: Theoretical reflections and Cape Verdean experiences. J Ethn Migr Stud. doi:10.1080/13691830120103912
  • Carling J, Collins F (2018). Aspiration, desire and drivers of migration. J Ethn Migr Stud. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2017.1384134
  • Castles S, Miller MJ (1993). The age of migration International population movements in the modern world. doi:10.1177/030913259401800310
  • Choldin HM (1999). Kinship networks in the migration process.
  • Choi BCK, Pak AWP (2006). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effective-ness. Clin Invest Med.
  • Crenshaw K (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum.
  • Dahinden J (2016). A plea for the 'de-migranticization' of research on migration and integration. Ethnic Racial Stud. doi:10.1080/01419870.2015.1124129
  • De Haas H (2021). A theory of migration: The aspirations-capabilities framework. Comp Migr Stud. doi:10.1186/s40878-020-00210-4
  • Durkheim É (1894). Les règles de la méthode sociologique.
  • Ewick P, Silbey SS (1998). The common place of law: Stories from everyday life.
  • Faist T (2004). Towards a political sociology of transnationalization: The state of the art in migration research. European Journal of Sociology. doi:10.1017/S0003975604001481
  • Faist T (2020). The crucial meso-level.
  • Foucault M (1991). Governmentality.
  • Fresnoza-Flot A (2022). Gender gaps in migration studies: Recent developments and prospects. doi:10.1163/9789004467682_007
  • Fresnoza-Flot A (2024). Pursuing social justice in gender and migration research. Int Migr. doi:10.1111/imig.13225
  • Fresnoza-Flot A, Liu-Farrer G (2022). Tangled mobilities. Places, affects, and personhood across social spheres in Asian migration. doi:10.3167/9781800735675
  • Froehlich DE, Rehm M, Rienties BC (2020). Mixed methods social network analysis. Theories and methodologies in learning and education.
  • Gärling T, Golledge RG (2000). Cognitive mapping and spatial decision-making.
  • Gaspar S, Ampudia de Haro F (2020). Buying citizenship? Chinese golden visa migrants in Portugal. International Migration. doi:10.1111/imig.12621
  • Geertz C (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Selected essays.
  • Ghosh S, Wang L (2003). Transnationalism and identity: A tale of two faces and multiple lives. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe canadien. doi:10.1111/1541-0064.00022
  • Glick Schiller N, Basch L, Blanc-Szanton C (1992). Transnationalism: A new analytic framework for understanding migration. Ann N Y Acad Sci. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1992.tb33484.x
  • Glick Schiller N, Salazar NB (2013). Regimes of mobility across the globe. J Ethn Migr Stud. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2013.723253
  • Graumann CF (1981). Psychology. Humanistic or human?.
  • Griffiths M, Rogers A, Anderson B (2013). Migration, time and temporalities: Review and prospect. COMPAS Research Resources Paper.
  • Hernández-Carretero M, Carling J (2012). Beyond "kamikaze migrants": Risk taking in West African boat migration to Europe. Human Organization. doi:10.17730/humo.71.4.n52709742v2637t1
  • Hochschild AR (2000). Global care chains and emotional surplus value.
  • Hondagneu-Sotelo P (2011). Gender and migration scholarship: An overview from a 21st century perspective. Migraciones Internacionales. doi:10.17428/rmi.v6i20.1066
  • Horevitz E (2009). Understanding the anthropology of immigration and migration. J Hum Behav Soc Environ. doi:10.1080/10911350902910914
  • Kerr P (2007). 'Humanising' - what's in a word?. Humanising Language Teaching.
  • King R, Thomson M, Fielding T (2006). Time, generations and gender in migration and settlement. doi:10.1515/9789048504176-009
  • Kley S (2011). Explaining the stages of migration within a life-course framework. European Sociological Review. doi:10.1093/esr/jcq020
  • Koikkalainen S, Kyle D (2016). Imagining mobility: The prospective cognition question in migration research. J Ethn Migr Stud. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2015.1111133
  • Korpela M (2023). International lives and Finnish rhythms: Mobile professionals' children, time and agency. Glob Stud Child. doi:10.1177/20436106231182152
  • Le Gall J (2005). Familles transnationales: Bilan des recherches et nouvelles perspectives. Diversité Urbaine.
  • Lincoln YS, Gonzalez y Gonzalez EM (2008). The search for emerging decolonizing methodologies in qualitative research: Further strategies for liberatory and democratic inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry. doi:10.1177/1077800408318304
  • Liu-Farrer G (2023). The logics of staying for highly skilled Asian migrants in Japan. Asian Pac Migr J. doi:10.1177/01171968231168137
  • Liu-Farrer G, Fresnoza-Flot A (2022). Conclusion: Empirical insights, policy implications, and COVID-19 influences. doi:10.2307/j.ctv2vr8tqj.16
  • Lorber J (1994). Paradoxes of gender.
  • Lucas-Thompson RG, Goldberg WA (2015). Gender ideology and work-family plans of the next generation. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-08891-4_1
  • Mahler SJ, Pessar PR (2001). Gendered geographies of power: Analyzing gender across transnational spaces. Identities. doi:10.1080/1070289X.2001.9962675
  • Mahler SJ, Pessar PR (2006). Gender matters: Ethnographers bring gender from the periphery toward the core of migration studies. Int Migr Rev. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7379.2006.00002.x
  • Massey DS (1988). Economic development and international migration in comparative perspective. Popul Dev Rev. doi:10.2307/1972195
  • Massey DS (1990). Social structure, household strategies, and the cumulative causation of migration. Popul Index. doi:10.2307/1972195
  • Massey D, Joaquín A, Hugo G (1998). Worlds in motion: International migration at the end of the millennium.
  • McAuliffe M, Triandafyllidou A (2021). World migration report 2022.
  • McCormack DP, Schwanen T (2011). Guest editorial: The space—times of decision making. Environ Plan A. doi:10.1068/a44351
  • Migali S, Scipioni M (2019). Who's about to leave? A global survey of aspirations and intentions to migrate. International Migration. doi:10.1111/imig.12617
  • Monrouxe LV (2009). Solicited audio diaries in longitudinal narrative research: A view from inside. Qualitative Research. doi:10.1177/1468794108098032
  • Morawska E (2015). Historical-structural models of international migration.
  • Ng I (2023). An unusual refuge: A case study of a South Asian and African multi-ethnic cluster in a Hong Kong rural walled village. J Rural Stud. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.01.019
  • Parreñas RS (2000). Migrant Filipina domestic workers and the international division of reproductive labor. Gender & Society.
  • Pessar PR, Mahler SJ (2003). Transnational migration: Bringing gender in. Int Migr Rev.
  • Portes A (2001). Introduction: The debates and significance of immigrant transnationalism. Glob Netw. doi:10.1111/1471-0374.00012
  • Pryor RJ (1979). South-East Asia: Migration and development.
  • Pryor RJ (1981). Integrating international and internal migration theories. Int Migr Rev. doi:10.1177/019791838101501s08
  • Rauch M, Ansari SS (2022). Diaries as a methodological innovation for studying grand challenges. doi:10.1108/S0733-558X20220000079019
  • Ravenstein EG (1885). The laws of migration. Journal of the Statistical Society of London. doi:10.2307/2979181
  • Richmond AH (1988). Sociological theories of international migration: The case of refugees. Curr Sociol. doi:10.1177/001139288036002004
  • Ryan L (2023). Social networks and migration: Relocations, relationships and resources. doi:10.51952/9781529213577
  • Salazar NB, Graburn NHH (2014). Tourism imaginaries: Anthropological approaches.
  • Sassen S (1988). The mobility of labor and capital: A study in international investment and labor flow. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511598296
  • Sassen S (2000). Women's burden: Counter-geographies of globalization and the feminization of survival. Journal of International Affairs.
  • Seal DW, Bogart LM, Ehrhardt AA (1998). Small group dynamics: The utility of focus group discussions as a research method. Group Dyn: Theory, Research, and Practice. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.2.4.253
  • Seligman MEP, Railton P, Baumeister RF (2013). Navigating into the future or driven by the past. Perspect Psychol Sci. doi:10.1177/1745691612474317
  • Smith LT (2021). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples.
  • Souralová A (2014). The Czech nanny as a "door to the majority" for children of Vietnamese immigrants in the Czech Republic. Studia Migracyjne-Przegląd Polonijny.
  • Stark O (1984). Discontinuity and the theory of international migration. KYKLOS. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6435.1984.tb00749.x
  • Sunanta S, Jaisuekun K (2022). Care as a right and care as commodity: Positioning international retirement migration in Thailand's old age care regime. doi:10.1007/978-981-16-6999-6_10
  • Swallow D, Petrie H, Power C (2015). Using photo diaries to elicit user requirements from older adults: A case study on mobility barriers. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22701-6_11
  • Tilley H (2010). Global histories, vernacular science, and African genealogies; or, is the history of science ready for the world?. Isis. doi:10.1086/652692
  • Timmerman C, Hemmerechts K, De Clerck HML (2014). The relevance of a "culture of migration" in understanding migration aspirations in contemporary Turkey. Turk Stud. doi:10.1080/14683849.2014.954748
  • Todaro MP (1989). Economic development in the third world (4th edition).
  • (2019). International migrant stock 2019.
  • Van der Velde M, van Naerssen T (2011). People, borders, trajectories: An approach to cross-border mobility and immobility in and to the European Union. Area. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00974.x
  • Van Hear N, Bakewell O, Long K (2018). Push-pull plus: Reconsidering the drivers of migration. J Ethn Migr Stud. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2017.1384135
  • Van Praag L, Ou-Salah L, Hut E (2021). Migration and environmental change in Morocco: In search for linkages between migration aspirations and (perceived) environmental changes. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-61390-7
  • Van Waes S, Van den Bossche P (2020). Around and around. The concentric circles method as a powerful tool to collect mixed method network data. Mixed Methods Social Network Analysis. Theories and Methodologies in Learning and Education.
  • Vertovec S (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic Racial Stud. doi:10.1080/01419870701599465
  • Wallerstein I (1974). The modern world-system I: capitalist agriculture and the origins of the world-economy in the sixteenth century, 1450–1600.
  • Wang B, Chen J (2021). Emotions and migration aspirations: Western scholars in China and the navigation of aspirational possibilities. J Ethn Migr Stud. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2020.1764841
  • Zundel M, MacIntosh R, Mackay D (2018). The utility of video diaries for organizational research. Organ Res Methods. doi:10.1177/1094428116665463