Published May 1, 2024 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Chilikorchestia chiltoni Thacker & Myers & Trivedi & Mitra 2024, sp. nov.

  • 1. Animal Taxonomy and Ecology Laboratory, Department of Life sciences, Hemchandracharya North Gujarat University, Patan- 384265, Gujarat, India
  • 2. School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University College Cork, Cork Enterprise Centre, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork, Ireland
  • 3. Animal Taxonomy and Ecology Laboratory, Department of Life sciences, Hemchandracharya North Gujarat University, Patan- 384265, Gujarat, India & Zoological Survey of India, F. P. S. Building, 27 J. L. Nehru Road, Kolkata- 700016, West Bengal, India & Animal Taxonomy and Ecology Laboratory, Department of Life sciences, Hemchandracharya North Gujarat University, Patan- 384265, Gujarat, India & Animal Taxonomy and Ecology Laboratory, Department of Life sciences, Hemchandracharya North Gujarat University, Patan- 384265, Gujarat, India

Description

Chilikorchestia chiltoni sp. nov.

(Figs. 2b & 6–8).

Material examined. Holotype male, 10.5 mm (LFSC.ZRC-201), Honeymoon Island, Chilika Lake (19°33'17"N 85°08'39"E), Odisha, India, 2 September, 2018, coll. D. Thacker. Paratypes, 1 male, 11 mm, 1 female, 4.5 mm (LFSC.ZRC-202), same data as holotype.

Etymology. The new species is named in honor of Charles Chilton, who worked as a Professor of Zoology at Canterbury University College, New Zealand and made a significant contribution to crustacean taxonomy. Charles Chilton was also a first researcher to publish a paper on amphipod diversity of Chilika Lake.

Description. Based on holotype male (10.5 mm) and paratype female (4.5 mm).

Head. Eyes medium, round. Antenna 1 slightly extending the distal end of the antenna 2 article 4 (Fig. 6: A1). Antenna 2 less than half of the length of the whole body; peduncular articles moderately incrassate; peduncular article 5 1.6 x as long as article 4; article 5 with some small robust setae (Fig. 6: A2). Labrum distal margin rounded with a row of small setae (Fig. 6: Lb). Labium with distally setose rounded plates (Fig. 6: L). Mandible left lacina moblis 5 dentate (Fig. 6: Md). Maxilla 1 vestigial with only 1 article. outer plate with 8 dentate setae; inner plate with 2 plumose setae (Fig. 6: Mx1). Maxilla 2 inner plate with a plumose seta on anterodistal corner (Fig. 6: Mx2). Maxilliped palp article 2 distomedial lobe well-developed; article 4 reduced, button shaped (Fig. 6: Mxp).

Pereon. Gnathopod 1 subchelate; coxa triangular, narrowing distally; basis 1.2 x as long as carpus; ischium subquadrate; merus shorter than carpus; carpus and propodus lobate on the posterodistal corner, palm with 4 robust setae; dactylus simplidactylate, subequal to palm (Fig. 7: G1). Gnathopod 2 subchelate, gill lobate; coxa subquadrate, posterior margin with a central shelf, ventral margin with few small hairs on posterior half, ventral margin with irregularly placed small robust setae; basis twice as long as broad, posterior margin with 4 small robust setae; ischium small; carpus small subrectangular; propodus oval, palm transverse with several small robust setae and a long protuberance at the posterodistal corner; dactylus longer than palm, fits into the groove formed on the protuberance (Fig. 7: G2). Pereopod 3–7 bicuspidactylate (Figs. 7: P3–P7). Pereopod 3 coxa subquadrate; basis long with robust setae on both margins; merus 1.5 x as long as carpus; propodus subequal to carpus (Fig. 7: P3). Pereopod 4 smaller than pereopod 3; basis long with robust setae on both margins; merus 1.6 x as long as carpus; propodus 1.2 x as long as carpus (Fig. 7: P4). Pereopod 5 basis expanded; merus subequal to carpus; propodus 1.3 x as long as carpus (Fig. 7: P5). Pereopod 6–7 similar, except pereopod 6 basis oval were as pereopod 7 basis subquadrate (Figs. 7: P6 & P7).

Pleon. Uropod 1 peduncle longer than rami with 7 robust setae in two margins, distolateral robust setae present, small, with simple tip; exopodite subequal to endopodite, without marginal robust setae; endopodite with 3 robust setae on inner margin (Fig. 7: U1). Uropod 2 peduncle little longer than rami, with 5 robust marginal setae; endopodite subequal to exopodite, with 2 marginal setae on inner margin; exopodite with 4 robust setae in two margins (Fig. 8: U2). Uropod 3 uniramous; peduncle longer than ramus with 2 robust setae; ramus narrowing distally (Fig. 8: U3). Telson slightly longer than broad, apically notched, with 5–6 robust setae on each lobe (Fig. 8: T).

Female (sexually dimorphic characters). Gnathopod 1 parachelate; posterior margin of carpus and propodus without lobe; propodus subrectangular. Gnathopod 2 mitten-shaped.

Remarks. This is the first record of a member of the Plarorchestiinae occurring in India. Previous records of Platorchestia platensis (Krøyer, 1845) from India (Barnard, 1935, Dev Roy et al., 2009, Surya Rao, 1972, Thilagavathi et al., 2013) are erroneous.

Distribution. Currently known only from the type locality.

Notes

Published as part of Thacker, Dimple, Myers, Alan A., Trivedi, Jigneshkumar N. & Mitra, Santanu, 2024, On a small collection of amphipods (Crustacea, Amphipoda) from Chilika Lake with the description of three new species and a new genus, pp. 383-404 in Zootaxa 5446 (3) on pages 390-394, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5446.3.4, http://zenodo.org/record/11101909

Files

Files (4.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:f94210838ca8369869c0afd6a0d01dff
4.8 kB Download

System files (34.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:8c966a2807f4eb34d2f32d76711dd805
34.1 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Collection code
LFSC
Family
Talitridae
Genus
Chilikorchestia
Kingdom
Animalia
Order
Amphipoda
Phylum
Arthropoda
Scientific name authorship
Thacker & Myers & Trivedi & Mitra
Species
chiltoni
Taxonomic status
sp. nov.
Taxon rank
species
Type status
holotype , paratype
Taxonomic concept label
Chilikorchestia chiltoni Thacker, Myers, Trivedi & Mitra, 2024

References

  • Barnard, K. H. (1935) Report on some Amphipoda, Isopoda, and Tanaidacea in the collections of the Indian Museum. Records of the Zoological Survey of India, 37 (3), 279 - 319. https: // doi. org / 10.26515 / rzsi / v 37 / i 3 / 1935 / 162970
  • Dev Roy, M. K., Nandi, N. C. & Khan, R. A. (2009) Invertebrate diversity. In: Faunal Diversity of Vembanad Lake. A Ramsar site in Kerala, India. Wetland Ecosystem Series 10. Zoological Survey of India, Kolakata, pp. 69 - 128.
  • Surya Rao, K. V. (1972) Intertidal amphipods from the Indian coast. In Proceding of Indian National Science Academy, 38, 190 - 205.
  • Thilagavathi, B., Varadharajan, D., Babu, A., Manoharan, J., Vijayalakshmi, S. & Balasubramanian, T. (2013) Distribution and diversity of macrobenthos in different mangrove ecosystems of Tamil Nadu coast, India. Journal of Aquaculture Research and Development, 4 (6), 1 - 12.