Published August 31, 2023 | Version 1
Journal article Open

Machine vision situations: Tracing distributed agency

  • 1. Department of Linguistic, Literary and Aesthetic Studies, University of Bergen, Bergen, 5020, Norway
  • 2. Department of Art and Media Studies, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, 7491, Norway

Description

This article proposes a new method for tracing and examining agency in heterogeneous assemblages, focusing on the role of machine vision technologies in creative works. We introduce the concept of the "machine vision situation", defined as the moment in which machine vision technologies come into play and make a difference to the course of events. By taking situations as the unit of analysis, we identify moments at which machine vision technologies take part in actions without reducing them to either tools or protagonists, instead allowing for more complex agential entanglements between human and non-human actors. Grounded on an interdisciplinary theoretical framework, this article demonstrates how an analytical unit such as the machine vision situation is a valuable method for tracing distributed agency. We illustrate this through three examples by applying the method to creative works – narratives, digital games, and artworks – revealing key aspects of distributed agency and calling attention to the excess, complications, and messy entanglements that might otherwise be overlooked in analyses of agential assemblages. The machine vision situation is shown to be a method-agnostic unit of analysis that can be productively incorporated in both quantitative and qualitative studies and applied to other contexts in which human and non-human actors interact.

Files

openreseurope-3-17395.pdf

Files (593.3 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:d00df9898417e6731f532965fd125626
593.3 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Akrich M (2023). Actor Network Theory, Bruno Latour, and the CSI. Soc Stud Sci. doi:10.1177/03063127231158102
  • Bennett J (2010). Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things.
  • Benzine V (2022). A.I. Should Exclude Living Artists From Its Database, Says One Painter Whose Works Were Used to Fuel Image Generators. ArtNet News.
  • Dream Q (2018). Detroit: Become Human.
  • Drucker J (2017). Why Distant Reading Isn't. PMLA. doi:10.1632/pmla.2017.132.3.628
  • Feinberg M (2017). A Design Perspective on Data. doi:10.1145/3025453.3025837
  • Gunderson M (2021). Populærkulturelle Forestillinger Av Utvidet Virkelighet: Makt Og (u)Leselige Identiteter Når Verden Blir En Skjerm. Tidsskrift for Kjønnsforskning. doi:10.18261/issn.1891-1781-2021-02-03-03
  • Hayles NK (2017). Unthought: The Power of the Cognitive Nonconscious.
  • Heidari S, Babor TF, De Castro P (2016). Sex and Gender Equity in Research: Rationale for the SAGER Guidelines and Recommended Use. Res Integr Peer Rev. doi:10.1186/s41073-016-0007-6
  • Kronman L (2019). The Deception of an Infinite View - Exploring Machine Vision in Digital Art. doi:10.14236/ewic/POM19.11
  • Kronman L (2020). Intuition Machines: Cognizers in Complex Human-Technical Assemblages. A Peer-Reviewed Journal About.
  • Kronman L (null). Hacking Surveillance Cameras, Tricking AI and Disputing Biases: Artistic Critiques of Machine Vision.
  • Latour B (2004). Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern. Critical Inquiry. doi:10.1086/421123
  • Latour B (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Clarendon Lectures in Management Studies.
  • Massumi B (2021). Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation.
  • Newitz A (2014). Drones Don't Kill People. Lightspeed Magazine.
  • Pierazzo E (2015). Textual Scholarship and Text Encoding. doi:10.1002/9781118680605.ch21
  • Rettberg JW (2017). Machine Vision in Everyday Life: Playful Interactions with Visual Technologies in Digital, Art, Games, Narratives and Social Media.
  • Rettberg JW (2020). Situated Data Analysis: A New Method for Analysing Encoded Power Relationships in Social Media Platforms and Apps. Humanit Soc Sci Commun. doi:10.1057/s41599-020-0495-3
  • Rettberg JW (2022a). Algorithmic Failure as a Humanities Methodology: Machine Learning's Mispredictions Identify Rich Cases for Qualitative Analysis. Big Data & Society. doi:10.1177/20539517221131290
  • Rettberg JW (2022b). What do fictional characters do with machine vision in games, novels and movies?.
  • Rettberg JW (2022c). Controlling Drones in Contemporary Science Fiction. zenodo. doi:10.5281/ZENODO.8006731
  • Rettberg JW, Gunderson M, Kronman L (2019). Mapping Cultural Representations of Machine Vision: Developing Methods to Analyse Games, Art and Narratives. doi:10.1145/3342220.3343647
  • Rettberg JW, Kronman L, Solberg R (2022a).
  • Rettberg JW, Kronman L, Solberg R (2022b). Representations of Machine Vision Technologies in Artworks, Games and Narratives: A Dataset. Data in Brief.
  • Ridler A (2018).  .
  • Ridler A (2019a). Mosaic Virus.
  • Ridler A (2019b). Using AI to Produce 'Impossible' Tulips.
  • Ridler A (2019c). An Interview with Anna Ridler, the Artist behind Mosaic Virus and Myriad (Tulips).
  • Sinclair S, Rockwell G (2015). Text Analysis and Visualization: Making Meaning Count. doi:10.1002/9781118680605.ch19
  • Solberg R (2021). Hologrammer i grenseland: Ikke‑menneskelige aktørers tilstedeværelse og handlingsrom i spill. Norsk medietidsskrift. doi:10.18261/issn.0805-9535-2021-04-03
  • Solberg R (2022a). (Always) Playing the Camera: Cyborg Vision and Embodied Surveillance in Digital Games. Surveillance & Society. doi:10.24908/ss.v20i2.14517
  • Solberg R (2022b). "Too Easy" or "Too Much"? (Re)imagining Protagonistic Enhancement through Machine Vision in Video Games. Przegląd Kulturoznawczy. doi:10.4467/20843860PK.22.037.17091