Published April 21, 2024 | Version v1
Journal article Open

SYNERGIZING ORTHODONTIC AND PROSTHETIC TREATMENT WITH 3D PRINTING: ADVANCEMENTS AND APPLICATIONS

Creators

  • 1. Medical University – Plovdiv

Description

This article explores the synergistic integration of orthodontic and prosthetic treatment facilitated by 3D printing technology. Through a comprehensive review of literature, the advancements and applications of 3D printing 
in combined orthodontic and prosthetic treatment are analyzed, highlighting its role in improving treatment outcomes, enhancing efficiency, and providing customized solution

Files

Deutsche internationale Zeitschrift für zeitgenössische Wissenschaft №78 2024-46-48.pdf

Files (278.9 kB)

Additional details

References

  • 1. Fleming P. S., Marinho V., Johal A. Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research. 2011;14(1):1–16. 2. Eliasova H., Dostalova T., Jelinek M., et al. Surface morphology of three-dimensionally printed replicas of upper dental arches. Applied Sciences. 2020;10(16, article 5708) 3. Jang Y., Sim J. Y., Park J. K., Kim W. C., Kim H. Y., Kim J. H. Accuracy of 3-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated on 3D-printed casts. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2020;123(1):135–142. 4. Kasparova M. Possibility of reconstruction of dental plaster cast from 3D digital study models. Biomedical engineering online. 2013;12, article 49 5. Jeong Y. G., Lee W. S., Lee K. B. Accuracy evaluation of dental models manufactured by CAD/CAM milling method and 3D printing method. The journal of advanced prosthodontics. 2018;10(3):245–251. 6. Stevens D. R., Flores-Mir C., Nebbe B., Raboud D. W., Heo G., Major P. W. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2006;129(6):794–803. 7. WatanabeKanno G. A., Abrão J., Miasiro Junior H., Sánchez-Ayala A., Lagravère M. O. Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital models. Brazilian Oral Research. 2009;23(3):288–295. 8. Dimitrova, M. Comparative study of linear and volumetric changes of 3D printed and conventional resins in removable prosthodontics [in Bulgarian]. PhD Thesis, 2023, Plovdiv. 9. Hazeveld A., Huddleston Slater J. J. R., Ren Y. Accuracy and reproducibility of dental replica models reconstructed by different rapid prototyping techniques. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2014;145(1):108–115. 10. Hazeveld A., Huddleston Slater J. J. R., Ren Y. Accuracy and reproducibility of dental replica models reconstructed by different rapid prototyping techniques. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2014;145(1):108–115. 11. Waldecker M., Leckel M., Rammelsberg P., Bömicke W. Fully digital fabrication of an occlusal device using an intraoral scanner and 3D printing: a dental technique. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2019;121(4):576–580