Published April 21, 2024
| Version v1
Journal article
Open
EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE: ENHANCING DENTAL TRAINING WITH 3D-PRINTED MODELS
Description
This article delves into the integration of 3D-printed models in dental education to bolster learning outcomes.
Leveraging 3D printing technology, dental training programs can furnish students with lifelike anatomical models
for immersive hands-on practice and simulation-based learning. The article scrutinizes the benefits and applications of 3D-printed models in dental education, underscoring their role in augmenting student proficiency, retention, and clinical readiness.
Files
Deutsche internationale Zeitschrift für zeitgenössische Wissenschaft №78 2024-36-37.pdf
Files
(272.2 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:a04e31c21265cf07c6d9202713f2a7bc
|
272.2 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- 1. Winkler J., Gkantidis N. Trueness and precision of intraoral scanners in the maxillary dental arch: An In Vivo analysis. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:1172. 2. Ligon S.C., Liska R., Stampfl J., Gurr M., Mülhaupt R. Polymers for 3D-printing and Customized Additive Manufacturing. Chem. Rev. 2017;117:10212–10290. 3. Mahrous A., Schneider G.B., Holloway J.A., Dawson D.V. Enhancing student learning in removable partial denture design by using virtual three-dimensional models versus traditional two-dimensional drawings: A comparative study. J. Prosthodont. 2019;28:927–933. 4. Jockusch J., Özcan M. Additive manufacturing of dental polymers: An overview on processes, materials and applications. Dent. Mater. J. 2020;39:345– 354. 5. Bandiaky O.N., Le Bars P., Gaudin A., Hardouin J.B., Cheraud-Carpentier M., Mbodj E.B., Soueidan A. Comparative assessment of complete-coverage, fixed tooth-supported prostheses fabricated from digital scans or conventional impressions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2020;127:71–79. 6. Richter M., Peter T., Rüttermann S., Sader R., Seifert L.B. 3D printed versus commercial models in undergraduate conservative dentistry training. Eur. J. Dent. Educ. 2022;26:643–651. 7. Dimitrova, M. Comparative study of linear and volumetric changes of 3D printed and conventional resins in removable prosthodontics [in Bulgarian]. PhD Thesis, 2023, Plovdiv. 8. Marty M., Broutin A., Vergnes J.-N., Vaysse F. Comparison of student's perceptions between 3Dprinted models versus series models in paediatric dentistry hands-on session. Eur. J. Dent. Educ. 2019;23:68–72. 9. Revilla-León M., Jiang P., Sadeghpour M., Piedra-Cascón W., Zandinejad A., Özcan M., Krishnamurthy V.R. Intraoral digital scans—Part 1: Influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of different intraoral scanners. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2020;124:372–378. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01748.x. 10. Güth J.F., Ponn A., Mast G., Gernet W., Edelhoff D. Description and evaluation of a new approach on pre-clinical implant dentistry education based on an innovative simulation model. Eur. J. Dent. Educ. 2010;14:221–226. 11. Javaid M., Haleem A. Current status and applications of additive manufacturing in dentistry: A literature-based review. J. Oral Biol. Craniofacial Res. 2019;9:179–185