Biodiversity Literature Repository

Submit to community
Liberated Data
Published February 17, 2016 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Mammal inventories in Seasonal Neotropical Forests: traditional approaches still compensate drawbacks of modern technologies

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Laboratório de Diversidade de Morcegos, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro - UFRRJ, BR 465, Km & Associação Mata Ciliar, Av. Emílio Antonon, 1000, 13212-010, Jundiaí, SP, Brazil. (cristina.adania@mataciliar.org.br) & Campo Grande, & Universidade de Lisboa, Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (Ce & C), Faculdade de Ciências de Lisboa, Ed. C
  • 2. Universidade de Lisboa, Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (Ce & C), Faculdade de Ciências de Lisboa, Ed. C & CESAM & Departamento de Biologia, Universidade de Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal. (lmrosalino@ua.pt)
  • 3. Associação Mata Ciliar, Av. Emílio Antonon, 1000, 13212-010, Jundiaí, SP, Brazil. (cristina.adania@mataciliar.org.br) & Campo Grande,
  • 4. Laboratório de Diversidade de Morcegos, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro - UFRRJ, BR 465, Km

Description

Carvalho, William D., Rosalino, Luís M., Adania, Cristina H., Esbérard, Carlos E. L. (2016): Mammal inventories in Seasonal Neotropical Forests: traditional approaches still compensate drawbacks of modern technologies. Iheringia, Série Zoologia (e2016005) 106: 1-9, DOI: 10.1590/1678-4766e2016005, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2016005

Files

source.pdf

Files (1.2 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:96758bca81f767a5d51a66ce6ee7c5ea
1.2 MB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:9675FFCAFFF7FFA5D51AFFCEFFE7FFEA

Related works

Has part
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.10979308 (DOI)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/B69A662CFFF4FFA6D58DFF59FB17FF2E (URL)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.10979310 (DOI)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/B69A662CFFF2FFA0D58DFF59FC1AFF2E (URL)

References

  • ALVES, L. C. P. S. & ANDRIOLO, A. 2005. Camera traps used on the mastofaunal survey of Araras Biological Reserve, IEF-RJ. Revista Brasileira de Zoociencias 7(2):231-246.
  • AMORIM,T. O. S. & ANDRIOLO,A. 2011.VariAveis ambientais e ocorrencia de marsupiais didelfIdeos em um fragmento de Mata Atlantica, no municIpio de Juiz de Fora, MG: uma amostragem por armadilhas fotogrAficas. Revista Brasileira de Zoociencias 13(1- 3):87-101.
  • ANGELI, T.; OLIVEIRA, M. L. & DUARTE, J. M. B. 2014. Differentiation of deer species of the genus Mazama by track morphometry. Studies Neotropical Fauna Environment 49(3):199-203.
  • BAREA-AZCON, J. M.; VIRGOS, E.; BALLESTEROS-DUPERON, E.; MOLEON, M. & CHIROSA, M. 2007. Surveying carnivores at large spatial scales: a comparison of four broad-applied methods. Biodiversity and Conservation 16(4):1213-1230.
  • BECKER, M. & DALPONTE, J. C. 1991. Rastros de mamiferos silvestres brasileiros: um guia de campo. BrasIlia, Universidade de BrasIlia. 180p.
  • BUCKLAND, S. T.; ANDERSON, D. R.; BURNHAM, K. P. & LAAKE,J. L. 1993. Distance sampling: estimating abundance of biological populations. London, Chapman and Hall. 446p.
  • CARVALHO, W. D.; GODOY, M. S. M.; ADANIA, C. H. & ESBERARD C. E. L. 2013. AssemblEia de mamIferos nAo voadores da Reserva BiolOgica Serra do Japi, JundiaI, SAo Paulo, sudeste do Brasil.Bioscience Journal 29(5):1370-1387.
  • CARVALHO,W. D.; ROSALINO, L. M.; DALPONTE,J. C.; SANTOS, B.; ADANIA, C. H. & ESBERARD, C. E. L. 2015.Can footprints of small and medium sized felids be distinguished in the field? Evidences from Brazil's Atlantic Forest. Tropical Conservation Science 8(3):760-777.
  • CHAME, M. 2003. Terrestrial mammal feces: a morphometric summary and description.Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 98(Suppl. 1):71-94.
  • COLWELL,R.K.; CHAO,A.; GOTELLI,N.J.; LIN, S-Y.; MAO,C.X.; CHAZDON, R. L. & LONGINO, J. T.2012.Models and estimators linking individualbased and sample-based rarefaction, extrapolation, and comparison of assemblages. Journal of Plant Ecology 5(1):3-21.
  • DELCIELLOS, A. C.; NOVAES, R. L. M.; LOGUERCIO, M. F. C.; GEISE, L.; SANTORI, R. T.; SOUZA, R. F.; PAPI, B. S.; RAICES, D.; VIEIRA, N. R.; FELIX, S.; DETOGNE, N.; SILVA, C. C. S.; BERGALLO, H. G. & ROCHABARBOSA, O. 2012. Mammals of Serra da Bocaina National Park, state of Rio de Janeiro, southeastern Brazil. Check List 8(4):675-692.
  • DI BITETTI,M. S.; PAVIOLO,A. & DE ANGELO, C. 2006. Density, habitat use and activity patterns of ocelots (Leopardus pardalis) in the Atlantic Forest of Misiones, Argentina. Journal of Zoology 270(1):153-163.
  • EISENBERG, J. F. & THORINGTON JR., R. W. 1973.A preliminary analysis of a neotropical mammal fauna. Biotropica 5(3):150-161.
  • EMMONS, L. H.; SHERMAN, P.; BOLSTER, D.; GOLDIZEN,A. & TERBORGH, J. 1989.Ocelot behavior in moonlight. In: EISENBERG, J. F. ed. Advances in Neotropical Mammalogy. Gainesville, Sandhill Crane Press, p. 233-240.
  • ESPARTOSA,K.D.; PINOTTI,B. T.& PARDINI, R.2011.Performance of camera trapping and track counts for surveying large mammals in rainforest remnants. Biodiversity and Conservation 20(12):2815-2829.
  • GAIDET-DRAPIER, N.; FRITZ, H.; BOUGAREL, M.; RENAUD, P. C.; POILECOT, P.; CHARDONNET, P.; GOID, G.; POULET, D. & BEL, S. L. 2006. Cost and efficiency of large mammal census techniques: comparison of methods for a participatory approach in a communal area, Zimbabwe. Biodiversity and Conservation 15(2):735-754.
  • HAMMER, O.; HARPER, D. A. T. & RYAN, P. D. 2001. Past: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4(1):1-9.
  • KELLY,M. J. 2008. Design, evaluate, refine:camera trap studies for elusive species. Animal Conservation (Commentary) 11(3):182-184.
  • LEITAO-FILHO,H. F. 1992.A flora arbOrea da Serra do Japi.In: MORELLATO, L. P.C.ed. Historia natural da Serra do Japi: ecologia e preservacao de uma area florestal no sudeste do Brasil. Campinas, Editora da UNICAMP, p. 40-62.
  • LONG, R.A.; MACKAY, P.; ZIELINSKI,W. J. & RAY,J. C. 2008. Noninvasive survey methods for carnivores. Washington DC, Island Press. 400p.
  • LYRA-JORGE, M. C.; CIOCHETI, G. & PIVELLO, V. R. 2008a. Carnivore mammals in a fragmented landscape in northeast of SAo Paulo State, Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation 17(7):1573-1580.
  • LYRA-JORGE, M. C.; CIOCHETI, G.; PIVELLO, V. R. & MEIRELLES, S. T. 2008b. Comparing methods for sampling large- and medium-sized mammals:camera traps and track plots. European Journal of Wildlife Research 54(4):739-744.
  • MAFFEI, L.; NOSS, A. J.; CUELLAR, E. & RUMIZ, D. I. 2005. Ocelot (Felis pardalis) population densities, activity, and ranging behaviour in the dry forest of eastern Bolivia: data from camera trapping. Journal of Tropical Ecology 21(3):349-353.
  • MAFFEI, L.; NOSS, A. J.; SILVER, S. C. & KELLY, M. J. 2011. Abundance/ density case study: Jaguars in the Americas. In: O'CONNELL, A. F.; NICHOLS, J. D. & KARANTH K. U. eds. Camera Traps in Animal Ecology. New York, Springer, p. 119-144.
  • MELO,G. L.; SPONCHIADO, J. & CACERES,N. C. 2012. Use of camera-traps in natural trails and shelters for the mammalian survey in the Atlantic Forest. Iheringia, SErie Zoologia 102(1):88-94.
  • MONTERROSO, P.; CASTRO, D.; SILVA, T. L.; FERRERAS, P.; GODINHO, R. & ALVES, P. C. 2012. Factors affecting the (in)accuracy of mammalian mesocarnivore scat identification in South-western Europe. Journal of Zoology 289(4):243-250.
  • MONROY-VILCHIS, O.; ZARCO-GONZALEZ, M. M.; RODRIGUEZ-SOTO, C.; SORIA-DIAZ, L. & URIOS, V. 2011. Fototrampeo de mamIferos em la Sierra Nanchititla, MExico:abundancia relativa y patrOn de actividad. Revista Biologia Tropical 59(1):373-383.
  • MUNARI, D. P.; KELLER, C. & VENTICINQUE, E. M. 2011. An evaluation of field techniques for monitoring terrestrial mammal populations in Amazonia. Mammalian Biology 76(4):401-408.
  • NEGRAO, M. F. F. & VALADARES-PADUA, C. 2006. Registros de mamIferos de maior porte na Reserva Florestal do Morro Grande, SAo Paulo. Biota Neotropical 6(2):1-13.
  • O'CONNELL,A. F.; NICHOLS, J. D. & KARANTH, K. U. 2011. Camera traps in animal ecology. Methods and analyses. New York, Springer.271p.
  • OLIFIERS, N.; LORETTO, D.; RADEMAKER, V. & CERQUEIRA, R. 2011. Comparing the effectiveness of tracking methods for medium to large-sized mammals of Pantanal. Zoologia 28(2):207-213.
  • OLIVEIRA, T. G. & CASSARO, K. 2005. Guia de campo dos felinos do Brasil. SAo Paulo, Instituto PrO CarnIvoros, Sociedade de ZoolOgicos do Brasil, FundacAo Parque ZoolOgico de SAo Paulo. 80p.
  • PERES,C.A.1999. General guidelines for standardizing line transect surveys of tropical forest primates. Neotropical Primates 7:11-16.
  • PINTO, H. S. 1992. Clima da Serra do Japi. In: MORELLATO, L. P. C. ed. Historia natural da Serra do Japi: ecologia e preservacao de uma area florestal no sudeste do Brasil. Campinas, Editora da UNICAMP, p. 30-38.
  • RIBEIRO, P. & MELO, F. R. 2013. MamIferos de mEdio e grande porte de uma Area agricultAvel em TerezOpolis (GO) com notas sobre mEtodos de amostragem. Neotropical Biological Conservation 8(2):68-78.
  • ROVERO,F.; ZIMMERMANN, F.; BERZI,D. & MEEK,P.2013."Which camera trap type and how many do I need?" A review of camera features and study designs for a range of wildlife research applications. Hystrix, the Italian Journal of Mammalogy 24:148-156.
  • RUDRAN, R.; KUNZ, T. H.; SOUTHWELL, C.; JARMAN, P. & SMITH, A. P. 1996. Observational techniques for nonvolant mammals. In: WILSON, D. E.; COLE, F. R.; NICHOLS, J. D.; RUDRAN, R. & FOSTER, M. S. eds. Measuring and monitoring biological diversity. Standard methods for mammals. Washington DC, Smithsonian Institution Press, p. 81-103.
  • SADLIER,L. M. J.; WEBBON, C. C.; BACKER, P.J. & HARRIS S. 2004. Methods of monitoring red foxes Vulpes vulpes and badgers Meles meles: are field signs the answer? Mammal Review 34(1-2):75-98.
  • SCOSS, L. M.; JUNIOR, P. M.; SILVA, E. & MARTINS S. V. 2004. Uso de parcelas de areia para o monitoramento de impacto de estradas sobre a riqueza de espEcies de mamIferos. Revista Arvore 28(1):121-127.
  • SI, X.; KAYS, R. & DING, P. 2014. How long is enough to detect terrestrial animals? Estimating the minimum trapping effort on camera traps. PeerJ. 2: e374.
  • SILVEIRA, L.; JACOMO,A. T. & DINIZ-FILHO, J. A. 2003. Camera trap, line transect census and track surveys: a comparative evaluation.Biological Conservation 114(3):351-355.
  • SRBEK-ARAUJO, A. C. & CHIARELLO, A. G. 2005. Is camera-trapping an efficient method to surveying mammals in neotropical forest? Journal Tropical Ecology 21(1):121-125.
  • _____. 2007. Armadilhas fotogrAficas na amostragem de mamIferos: consideracoes metodolOgicas e comparacAo de equipamentos.Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 24(3):647-656.
  • _____. 2013.Influence of camera-trap sampling design on mammal species capture rates and community structures in southeastern Brazil. Biota Neotropical 13(2):51-62.
  • STANDER,P. E. 1998. Spoor counts as indices of large carnivore populations: the relationship between spoor frequency, sampling effort and true density. Journal of Applied Ecology 35(3):378-385.
  • SUNARTO; SOLLMANN, R.; MOHAMED, A. & KELLY, M. J. 2013. Camera trapping for the study and conservation of tropical carnivores. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 28:21-42.
  • TOBLER, M. W.; CARRILO-PERCASTEGUI, S. E.; PITMAN, R. L.; MARES, R. & POWELL, G. 2008. An evaluation of camera traps for inventorying large-and-medium sized terrestrial rainforest mammals. Animal Conservation 11(3):169-178.
  • TOMAS,W. M. & MIRANDA, G. H. B. 2003.Uso de armadilhas fotogrAficas em levantamentos populacionais. In: CULLEN JR., L.; RUDRAN, R. & VALLADARES- PADUA, C. eds. Metodos de estudos em biologia da conservacao e manejo da vida Silvestre. Curitiba, Editora Universidade Federal do ParanA, p. 243-267.
  • VELOSO, H. P. & GOES-FILHO, L. 1982. 'Fitogeografia brasileira: uma classificacao fisionomica-ecologica da vegetacao neotropical'. Rio de Janeiro, Boletim TEcnico, Projeto Radam Brasil. 85p.
  • VIVO, M.; CARMIGNOTTO, A. P.; GREGORIN, R.; HINGST-ZAHER, E.; IACKXIMENES, G. E.; MIRETZKI, M.; PERCEQUILLO, A. P.; JUNIOR, M. M. R.; ROSSI, R. V. & TADDEI, V. A. 2011. Checklist dos mamIferos do Estado de SAo Paulo, Brasil. Biota Neotropical 11(Supl. 1):111-131.