Published November 20, 2023 | Version 1
Journal article Open

Protocol for a web survey experiment studying the feasibility of asking respondents to capture and submit photos of the books they have at home and the resulting data quality

  • 1. Research and Expertise Centre for Survey Methodology, Department of Political and Social Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Catalonia, 08005, Spain
  • 2. Institut Barcelona d'Estudis Internacionals, Barcelona, Catalonia, 08005, Spain
  • 3. Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin, Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • 4. Institute for Educational Quality Improvement at the Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin, Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • 5. GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Mannheim, Germany

Description

This document presents the protocol of a study conducted as a part of the WEB DATA OPP project, which is funded by the H2020 program. The study aimed to investigate different aspects of the collection of images through web surveys. To do this, we implemented a mobile web survey in an opt-in online panel in Spain. The survey had various questions, some of which were about the books that the participants have at their main residence. The questions related to books were asked in three different ways: regular survey questions showing visual examples of how different numbers of books fit in a 74 centimetre wide shelf depending on their thickness, regular survey questions without the visual examples, and questions where participants were asked to send photos of the books at their home. This report explains how the study was designed and conducted. It covers important aspects such as the experimental design, the questionnaire used, the characteristics of the participants, ethical considerations, and plans for disseminating the results.

This document presents the protocol of our study asking respondents for information about the books they have at home. This information was solicited through conventional types of questions ( i.e., typing in answers or choosing one answer category), and/or through asking respondents to take and send photos of the books.

This study has methodological and substantive objectives. The former involves investigating respondents' preference, evaluation of the questions, participation levels, compliance, and data quality. The latter focuses on exploring the impact of the number of books on the academic achievement of children and examining other factors that might influence these relations.

We conducted a mobile web survey, assigning respondents to four groups:

   •   Choice: Respondents could choose their preferred answering method.

   •   Text-TextPlus: Respondents answered conventional questions first, and later received illustrations of how different numbers of books looked like to help respondents provide accurate answers.

   •   TextPlus-Images: Respondents answered conventional questions with the illustrations and then submitted photos of the books at home.

   •   Images-Text: Respondents shared photos of the books and then answered the conventional questions.

Respondents were asked to evaluate their respective answering methods. The questionnaire had up to 65 questions covering various dimensions, including respondents' sociodemographic characteristics, children's academic performance, literacy-related activities, and camera usage.

Data were collected using the Netquest opt-in online panel in Spain. The tool WebdataVisual was used to capture and share the photos. The target population included parents of children living with them and who attended the first, third, or fifth year of primary school. The sample size was 1,202 cases.

We expect this study to provide valuable insights regarding visual data collection through web surveys. Further, we expect to gain a better understanding of the data on the books respondents have at home when such data are collected through different methods.

Files

openreseurope-3-17821.pdf

Files (1.2 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:688a242815ad7656871d640f8225fa68
1.2 MB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Asadullah MN, Tham E (2023). Learning and happiness during Covid-19 school closure in urban Malaysia. Int J Educ Dev. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2023.102822
  • Bezek Güre Ö, Şevgin H, Kayri̇ M (2023). Reviewing the Factors Affecting PISA Reading Skills by Using Random Forest and MARS Methods. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research.
  • Bosch OJ, Revilla M, Paura E (2019a). Answering mobile surveys with images: An exploration using a computer vision API. Soc Sci Comput Rev. doi:10.1177/0894439318791515
  • Bosch OJ, Revilla M, Paura E (2019b). Do Millennials differ in terms of survey participation?. International Journal of Market Research. doi:10.1177/1470785318815567
  • Bosch OJ, Revilla M, Qureshi DD (2022). A new experiment on the use of images to answer web survey questions. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. doi:10.1111/rssa.12856
  • Bourdieu P (1986). The forms of capital.
  • Brunello G, Weber G, Weiss CT (2012). Books are forever: Early life conditions, education and lifetime earnings in Europe.
  • Edwards AL (1957). The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research.
  • Engzell P (2021). What Do Books in the Home Proxy For? A Cautionary Tale. Sociol Methods Res. doi:10.1177/0049124119826143
  • García Trejo Y, Meyers M, Martinez M (2022). Identifying Data Quality Challenges in Online Opt-In Panels Using Cognitive Interviews in English and Spanish. J Off Stat. doi:10.2478/jos-2022-0035
  • Gavali P, Banu JS (2019). Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Image Classification on CUDA Platform. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-816718-2.00013-0
  • Heppt B, Olczyk M, Volodina A (2022). Number of books at home as an indicator of socioeconomic status: Examining its extensions and their incremental validity for academic achievement. Soc Psychol Educ. doi:10.1007/s11218-022-09704-8
  • Iglesias PA, Ochoa Gómez C, Revilla M (2023). A Practical Guide to (Successfully) Collect and Process Images Through Web Surveys. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4522641
  • Iglesias PA, Revilla M (2023). Skills, availability, willingness, expected participation and burden of sharing visual data within the frame of web surveys. Qual Quant. doi:10.1007/s11135-023-01670-3
  • Ilic G, Lugtig P, Schouten B (2022). Pictures instead of survey questions: An experimental investigation of the feasibility of using pictures in a housing survey. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. doi:10.1111/rssa.12960
  • Jäckle A, Burton J, Couper MP (2019). Participation in a mobile app survey to collect expenditure data as part of a large-scale probability household panel: Coverage and participation rates and biases. Surv Res Methods. doi:10.18148/srm/2019.v1i1.7297
  • Kaur S, Pandey S, Goel S (2019). Plants disease identification and classification through leaf images: A survey. Arch Comput Methods Eng. doi:10.1007/s11831-018-9255-6
  • McNally S, Leech KA, Corriveau KH (2023). Indirect Effects of Early Shared Reading and Access to Books on Reading Vocabulary in Middle Childhood. Sci Stud Read. doi:10.1080/10888438.2023.2220846
  • Pataki BA, Garriga J, Eritja R (2021). Deep learning identification for citizen science surveillance of tiger mosquitoes. Sci Rep. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-83657-4
  • Read B (2019). Respondent burden in a mobile app: Evidence from a shopping receipt scanning study. Surv Res Methods. doi:10.18148/srm/2019.v1i1.7379
  • Revilla M, Iglesias PA, Ochoa C (2022). WebdataVisual: A tool to collect visual data within the frame of web surveys. doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/R7CAX
  • Revilla M, Saris WE (2013). The Split-Ballot Multitrait-Multimethod Approach: Implementation and Problems. Struct Equ Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. doi:10.1080/10705511.2013.742379
  • Sanders LM, Zacur G, Haecker T (2004). Number of Children's Books in the Home: An Indicator of Parent Health Literacy. Ambul Pediatr. doi:10.1367/A04-003R.1
  • Saris WE, Andrews FM (2004). Evaluation of Measurement Instruments Using a Structural Modeling Approach. doi:10.1002/9781118150382.ch28
  • Saris WE, Satorra A, Coenders G (2004). A new approach to evaluating the quality of measurement instruments: The split-ballot MTMM design. Sociol Methodol. doi:10.1111/j.0081-1750.2004.00155.x
  • Schouten B, Bulman J, Järvensivu M (2020). Report on the action @HBS.
  • Sieben S, Lechner CM (2019). Measuring cultural capital through the number of books in the household. Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences. doi:10.1186/s42409-018-0006-0